Fujimura Naoki, Obara Hideaki, Suda Koichi, Takeuchi Hiroya, Matsuda Sachiko, Kurosawa Tomoko, Katono Yasuhiro, Murata Mitsuru, Kishi Kazuo, Kitagawa Yuko
Departments of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Departments of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
J Infect Chemother. 2015 Apr;21(4):312-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
The development of an effective rat model of incisional surgical site infection (SSI) has so far proven difficult. In this study, we created a novel incisional SSI model and validated it in terms of both macroscopic and microscopic aspects including its response to treatment using antimicrobial wound-dressing, Aquacel Ag(®). Wounds were created on the dorsum of rats. 3-0 Vicryl(®) threads inoculated with Escherichia coli were inserted in the wound beds in the infection group (n = 6). The wounds were closed for two days to induce infection and then opened and covered with polypropylene sheets during the study. Aquacel Ag was placed under the polypropylene sheet in the infected wounds of the Aquacel Ag group rats (n = 6). The wounds in the control group (n = 6) contained sterile Vicryl thread that had not been inoculated with E. coli. The macroscopic appearance, wound area, bacterial counts, and histology of each group were evaluated. The infection group demonstrated significantly lower wound healing (p < 0.001), greater bacterial counts (median [interquartile range] ratings, 2.15 × 10(7) [0.51 × 10(7)-53.40 × 10(7)] vs 2.07 × 10(4) [0.60 × 10(4)-4.45 × 10(4)] CFU/g, respectively; p < 0.01), and severer histological inflammation (p < 0.001) than the control group. The Aquacel Ag group was only able to show significantly better wound healing than the infection group (p < 0.001). The new incisional SSI model exhibited all clinical manifestations of incisional SSI. It could be utilized to assess the effectiveness of newly developed treatments for incisional SSI.
迄今为止,建立有效的切口手术部位感染(SSI)大鼠模型颇具难度。在本研究中,我们创建了一种新型切口SSI模型,并从宏观和微观方面对其进行了验证,包括其对抗菌伤口敷料Aquacel Ag(®)治疗的反应。在大鼠背部制造伤口。感染组(n = 6)的伤口床中插入接种了大肠杆菌的3-0薇乔(®)缝线。伤口闭合两天以诱导感染,然后在研究期间打开并用聚丙烯片覆盖。Aquacel Ag组大鼠(n = 6)的感染伤口在聚丙烯片下放置Aquacel Ag。对照组(n = 6)的伤口含有未接种大肠杆菌的无菌薇乔缝线。评估每组的宏观外观、伤口面积、细菌计数和组织学情况。与对照组相比,感染组的伤口愈合明显更差(p < 0.001),细菌计数更高(中位数[四分位间距]评分分别为2.15×10(7)[0.51×10(7)-53.40×10(7)]与2.07×10(4)[0.60×10(4)-4.45×10(4)]CFU/g;p < 0.01),组织学炎症更严重(p < 0.001)。Aquacel Ag组仅显示出伤口愈合明显优于感染组(p < 0.001)。新的切口SSI模型展现了切口SSI的所有临床表现。它可用于评估新开发的切口SSI治疗方法的有效性。