Suppr超能文献

脾外伤的管理:一家机构的8年经验

Management of splenic trauma: a single institution's 8-year experience.

作者信息

Rosati Carl, Ata Ashar, Siskin Gary P, Megna Domenic, Bonville Daniel J, Stain Steven C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Albany Medical Center, 50 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, NY 12208, USA.

Department of Surgery, Albany Medical Center, 50 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, NY 12208, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2015 Feb;209(2):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.06.034. Epub 2014 Oct 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Management of splenic trauma has evolved, with current practice favoring selective angiographic embolization and non-operative treatment over immediate splenectomy. Defining the optimal selection criteria for the appropriate management strategy remains an important question.

METHODS

This retrospective registry review was conducted at a Level I trauma center. The patient population consisted of 20,561 patients in the State Trauma Registry from April 2004 to May 2012. Splenectomy, angiography, splenic embolization, nonoperative, and noninterventional (NI) observation were the management strategies under study. Morbidity and mortality were the outcome measures. Morbidity and mortality by management strategy.

RESULTS

During the 8-year study period, 926 (4.5%) patients sustained splenic injury. Observational management increased over time despite the similar distribution of splenic injury grade over the study period: grade I/II (50%), grade III (24.2%), and grade IV/V (25.8%). Mortality rates associated with each management strategy were the following: immediate splenectomy (IS; 25%), splenic embolization (SE; 3.9%), and angiography only or observation, that is, NI (6.5%) management. Injury severity score (ISS) was highest in IS (36.1 ± 1.3) compared with SE (29.1 ± 1.0, P = .001) and NI (21.6, P < .001). Splenectomy was required in 5 of the 129 (3.9%) patients managed with SE and 9 of the 677 (1.3%) patients managed by NI. Mortality was significantly lower among those managed by SE (odds ratio .12, 95% confidence interval: .05 to .32) or NI (odds ratio .21, 95% confidence interval: .12 to .35). This survival benefit was explained by the association of IS with systolic blood pressure <90, high ISS, low GCS at presentation, ISS, development of shock, need for transfusion, and multiorgan failure.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large 8-year single institution study, we observed an increase in nonoperative management by an increased application of angiography and embolization. An aggressive utilization of SE in patients with appropriate indications will result in low failure rates and improved mortality.

摘要

背景

脾外伤的处理方式已经有所发展,目前的做法倾向于选择性血管造影栓塞术和非手术治疗,而非立即进行脾切除术。确定合适的治疗策略的最佳选择标准仍然是一个重要问题。

方法

这项回顾性登记研究在一家一级创伤中心进行。患者群体包括2004年4月至2012年5月期间国家创伤登记处的20561名患者。脾切除术、血管造影、脾栓塞、非手术和非介入(NI)观察是所研究的治疗策略。发病率和死亡率是观察指标。按治疗策略划分的发病率和死亡率。

结果

在8年的研究期间,926名(4.5%)患者发生脾损伤。尽管在研究期间脾损伤分级分布相似,但观察性治疗随着时间的推移有所增加:I/II级(50%)、III级(24.2%)和IV/V级(25.8%)。与每种治疗策略相关的死亡率如下:立即脾切除术(IS;25%)、脾栓塞术(SE;3.9%)以及仅血管造影或观察,即NI(6.5%)治疗。与SE(29.1±1.0,P = 0.001)和NI(21.6,P < 0.001)相比,IS患者的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)最高(36.1±1.3)。在接受SE治疗的129名患者中有5名(3.9%)和接受NI治疗的677名患者中有9名(1.3%)需要进行脾切除术。SE治疗组(优势比0.12,95%置信区间:0.05至0.32)或NI治疗组(优势比0.21,95%置信区间:0.12至0.35)的死亡率显著较低。这种生存获益可通过IS与收缩压<90、高ISS、入院时低格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)、ISS、休克的发生、输血需求和多器官功能衰竭之间的关联来解释。

结论

在这项为期8年的大型单机构研究中,我们观察到通过增加血管造影和栓塞术的应用,非手术治疗有所增加。对有适当指征的患者积极应用SE将导致低失败率并改善死亡率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验