Génot Elisabeth, Gligorijevic Bojana
Université de Bordeaux, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; INSERM U1045, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; European Institute of Chemistry and Biology, 2 rue Robert Escarpit, 33 600 Pessac, France.
Department of Systems & Computational Biology and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Price Center, 1301 Morris Park Avenue, 10461 Bronx, NY, USA.
Eur J Cell Biol. 2014 Oct;93(10-12):367-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
Podosomes and invadopodia (collectively known as invadosomes) are small, F-actin-rich protrusions that are located at points of cell-ECM contacts and endow cells with invasive capabilities. So far, they have been identified in human or murine immune (myelomonocytic), vascular and cancer cells. The overarching reason for studying invadosomes is their connection to human disease. For example, macrophages and osteoclasts lacking Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASp) are not able to form podosomes, and this leads to altered macrophage chemotaxis and defective bone resorption by osteoclasts. In contrast, the ability of cancer cells to form invadopodia is associated with high invasive and metastatic potentials. While invadosome composition, dynamics and signaling cascades leading to their assembly can be followed easily in in vitro assays, studying their contribution to pathophysiological processes in situ remains challenging. A number of recent papers have started to address this issue and describe invadosomes in situ in mouse models of cancer, cardiovascular disease and angiogenesis. In addition, in vivo invadosome homologs have been reported in developmental model systems such as C. elegans, zebrafish and sea squirt. Comparative analyses among different invasion mechanisms as they happen in their natural habitats, i.e., in situ, may provide an outline of the invadosome evolutionary history, and guide our understanding of the roles of the invasion process in pathophysiology versus development.
足体和侵袭性伪足(统称为侵袭体)是富含丝状肌动蛋白的小突起,位于细胞与细胞外基质接触点,赋予细胞侵袭能力。到目前为止,它们已在人类或小鼠的免疫(骨髓单核细胞)、血管和癌细胞中被鉴定出来。研究侵袭体的首要原因是它们与人类疾病的关联。例如,缺乏威斯科特-奥尔德里奇综合征蛋白(WASp)的巨噬细胞和破骨细胞无法形成足体,这会导致巨噬细胞趋化性改变以及破骨细胞骨吸收缺陷。相反,癌细胞形成侵袭性伪足的能力与高侵袭和转移潜能相关。虽然在体外实验中可以轻松追踪侵袭体的组成、动态变化以及导致其组装的信号级联反应,但研究它们在病理生理过程中的原位作用仍然具有挑战性。最近的一些论文已开始探讨这个问题,并在癌症、心血管疾病和血管生成的小鼠模型中描述了原位侵袭体。此外,在秀丽隐杆线虫、斑马鱼和海鞘等发育模型系统中也报道了体内侵袭体同源物。对不同侵袭机制在其自然生境(即原位)中的比较分析,可能会勾勒出侵袭体的进化历史,并指导我们理解侵袭过程在病理生理学与发育中的作用。