Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX; Center for Translational Injury Research, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX.
Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Dec;219(6):1157-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.07.943. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
Clot lysis values (LY30) determined by rapid thrombelastography (rTEG) predict postinjury transfusion needs and mortality risk. However, the first derivative velocity curve values generated by rTEG measuring lysis—maximum rate of lysis (MRL) and total lysis (TL)—have not been evaluated. Although recent data support use of antifibrinolytics in trauma, the population that would benefit remains poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to determine if velocity curves more accurately predict large volume transfusions and early mortality than conventional rTEG values.
Conventional and velocity curve admission rTEG values of adult trauma patients were retrospectively evaluated for their ability to predict early transfusion of RBC and plasma, substantial bleeding, massive transfusion, and mortality. Patient outcomes were compared according to hyperfibrinolysis diagnosed by velocity curve values and the conventional LY30 cutoff.
There were 1,625 patients included. Clot lysis values predicted early transfusion of RBC (p = 0.003), but not plasma (p = 0.298), within 3 hours of arrival. With respect to velocity curves, MRL and TL predicted both early RBC and plasma transfusion (p < 0.05). All 3 parameters predicted massive transfusion, but only MRL and TL predicted substantial bleeding (odds ratio [OR] 3.1 and 2.9, respectively). In addition, MRL was a stronger predictor of 24-hour and 30-day mortality (p < 0.001) and was also available earlier after arrival than LY30 (p < 0.001).
Velocity curve measures of fibrinolysis are stronger predictors of early transfusion of blood components, bleeding, and mortality after trauma compared with conventional rTEG values. In addition, the MRL is more rapidly available after arrival, which may facilitate earlier diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant hyperfibrinolysis.
快速血栓弹力图(rTEG)测定的凝块溶解值(LY30)可预测受伤后的输血需求和死亡率风险。然而,rTEG 测量的溶解的一阶导数速度曲线值——最大溶解速率(MRL)和总溶解(TL)——尚未得到评估。尽管最近的数据支持在创伤中使用抗纤维蛋白溶解药物,但受益人群仍未得到明确界定。本研究旨在确定速度曲线是否比常规 rTEG 值更能准确预测大量输血和早期死亡率。
回顾性评估成人创伤患者入院时常规和速度曲线 rTEG 值,以评估其预测早期输血 RBC 和血浆、大量出血、大量输血和死亡率的能力。根据速度曲线值和常规 LY30 截断值诊断的高纤溶状态,比较患者的结局。
共纳入 1625 例患者。LY30 预测了入院后 3 小时内的 RBC(p=0.003)但不能预测血浆(p=0.298)的早期输血。关于速度曲线,MRL 和 TL 预测了早期 RBC 和血浆的输血(p<0.05)。所有 3 个参数均预测了大量输血,但只有 MRL 和 TL 预测了大量出血(比值比[OR]分别为 3.1 和 2.9)。此外,MRL 是 24 小时和 30 天死亡率的更强预测指标(p<0.001),并且在入院后比 LY30 更早获得(p<0.001)。
与常规 rTEG 值相比,纤溶速度曲线测量值可更好地预测创伤后早期输血、出血和死亡率。此外,MRL 在入院后更快获得,这可能有助于更早诊断和治疗临床上显著的高纤溶状态。