Detante O, Jaillard A, Moisan A, Barbieux M, Favre I M, Garambois K, Hommel M, Remy C
University Hospital of Grenoble, Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, CS 10217, boulevard de la Chantourne, 38700 La Tronche, France; Inserm, U 836, BP 170, 38042 Grenoble cedex 9, France; Grenoble University, Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (Team 5), BP 170, 38042 Grenoble cedex 9, France; Kyoto University, Institute for Frontier Medical Sciences, Department of Reparative Materials, 606-8507 Kyoto, Japan.
3T-MRI Research Unit, Department of Neuroradiology, CHU de Grenoble, boulevard de la Chantourne, 38700 La Tronche, France.
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2014 Dec;170(12):779-98. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide and the most common cause of severe disability. Neuroprotection and repair mechanisms supporting endogenous brain plasticity are often insufficient to allow complete recovery. While numerous neuroprotective drugs trials have failed to demonstrate benefits for patients, they have provided interesting translational research lessons related to neurorestorative therapy mechanisms in stroke. Stroke damage is not limited to neurons but involve all brain cell type including the extracellular matrix in a "glio-neurovascular niche". Targeting a range of host brain cells, biotherapies such as growth factors and therapeutic cells, currently hold great promise as a regenerative medical strategy for stroke. These techniques can promote both neuroprotection and delayed neural repair through neuro-synaptogenesis, angiogenesis, oligodendrogliogenesis, axonal sprouting and immunomodulatory effects. Their complex mechanisms of action are interdependent and vary according to the particular growth factor or grafted cell type. For example, while "peripheral" stem or stromal cells can provide paracrine trophic support, neural stem/progenitor cells (NSC) or mature neurons can act as more direct neural replacements. With a wide therapeutic time window after stroke, biotherapies could be used to treat many patients. However, guidelines for selecting the optimal time window, and the best delivery routes and doses are still debated and the answers may depend on the chosen product and its expected mechanism including early neuroprotection, delayed neural repair, trophic systemic transient effects or graft survival and integration. Currently, the great variety of growth factors, cell sources and cell therapy products form a therapeutic arsenal that is available for stroke treatment. Their effective clinical use will require prior careful considerations regarding safety (e.g. tumorgenicity, immunogenicity), potential efficacy, cell characterization, delivery route and in vivo biodistribution. Bone marrow-derived cell populations such as mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSC) or mononuclear cells (MNC), umbilical cord stem cells and NSC are most investigated notably in clinical trials. Finally, we discuss perspectives concerning potential novel biotherapies such as combinatorial approaches (growth factor combined with cell therapy, in vitro optimization of cell products, or co-transplantation) and the development of biomaterials, which could be used as injectable hydrogel scaffold matrices that could protect a cell graft or selectively deliver drugs and growth factors into the post-stroke cavity at chronic stages. Considering the remaining questions about the best procedure and the safety cautions, we can hope that future translational research about biotherapies will bring more efficient treatments that will decrease post-stroke disability for many patients.
中风是全球第二大死因,也是严重残疾的最常见原因。支持内源性脑可塑性的神经保护和修复机制往往不足以实现完全康复。尽管众多神经保护药物试验未能证明对患者有益,但它们为中风神经修复治疗机制提供了有趣的转化研究经验教训。中风损伤不仅限于神经元,还涉及包括“神经胶质-神经血管微环境”中的细胞外基质在内的所有脑细胞类型。针对一系列宿主脑细胞,生长因子和治疗性细胞等生物疗法目前作为中风的再生医学策略具有很大前景。这些技术可以通过神经突触发生、血管生成、少突胶质细胞生成、轴突萌发和免疫调节作用促进神经保护和延迟神经修复。它们复杂的作用机制相互依存,并因特定的生长因子或移植细胞类型而异。例如,虽然“外周”干细胞或基质细胞可以提供旁分泌营养支持,但神经干细胞/祖细胞(NSC)或成熟神经元可以作为更直接的神经替代物。由于中风后有较宽的治疗时间窗,生物疗法可用于治疗许多患者。然而,选择最佳时间窗以及最佳给药途径和剂量的指南仍存在争议,答案可能取决于所选产品及其预期机制,包括早期神经保护、延迟神经修复、营养全身短暂效应或移植物存活和整合。目前,种类繁多的生长因子、细胞来源和细胞治疗产品构成了可用于中风治疗的治疗武器库。它们的有效临床应用需要事先仔细考虑安全性(如致瘤性、免疫原性)、潜在疗效、细胞表征、给药途径和体内生物分布。骨髓来源的细胞群体,如间充质基质/干细胞(MSC)或单核细胞(MNC)、脐带干细胞和NSC,在临床试验中研究得最为显著。最后,我们讨论了潜在的新型生物疗法的前景,如联合方法(生长因子与细胞疗法联合、细胞产品的体外优化或共移植)以及生物材料的开发,这些生物材料可用作可注射水凝胶支架基质,可在慢性阶段保护细胞移植物或选择性地将药物和生长因子输送到中风后腔隙。考虑到关于最佳程序和安全注意事项仍存在的问题,我们希望未来关于生物疗法的转化研究将带来更有效的治疗方法,从而减少许多中风患者的后遗症。