Goetz Amy R, Lee Han-Joo
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;46:151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.10.003.
Recent research suggests that safety behaviors (SB) may not preclude treatment gains in exposure-based therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder. However, it is relatively unknown what specific types of SBs may be detrimental to the therapeutic process, with some arguing that SBs be classified based on their function. The current study sought to examine the extent to which different SBs enhanced or weakened symptoms of contamination fear during a single session of exposure.
Sixty-seven non-clinical students were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (1) exposure with no SBs (NSB), (2) exposure with preventive SBs (PSB), or (3) exposure with restorative SBs (RSB).
Among the primary outcome measures, greater reductions in fear and behavioral avoidance were found for RSB in comparison to PSB, and the gains made by RSB were generalizable to other sources of potential contamination. Furthermore, RSB resulted in more rapid reductions in fear and disgust across repeated exposure trials.
Limitations include the use of a nonclinical student sample.
Overall, the current study suggests that RSB may be beneficial as an adjunct to therapy whereas PSB are potentially detrimental. Results of the study are discussed in terms of exposure theories and the treatment of anxiety disorders.
近期研究表明,在强迫症的暴露疗法中,安全行为(SB)可能并不会妨碍治疗效果。然而,具体哪些类型的安全行为可能对治疗过程有害,目前尚不清楚,有人认为安全行为应根据其功能进行分类。本研究旨在探讨在单次暴露过程中,不同类型的安全行为在多大程度上增强或减轻了污染恐惧症状。
67名非临床学生被随机分配到以下三种情况之一:(1)无安全行为的暴露组(NSB),(2)预防性安全行为暴露组(PSB),或(3)恢复性安全行为暴露组(RSB)。
在主要结局指标方面,与预防性安全行为组相比,恢复性安全行为组的恐惧和行为回避减少得更多,而且恢复性安全行为组的改善可推广到其他潜在污染源。此外,在重复暴露试验中,恢复性安全行为组的恐惧和厌恶情绪减少得更快。
局限性包括使用了非临床学生样本。
总体而言,本研究表明恢复性安全行为作为治疗辅助手段可能有益,而预防性安全行为可能有害。本研究结果将根据暴露理论和焦虑症治疗进行讨论。