运用延迟折扣来理解社交焦虑个体的冲动选择:未能重复验证。
Using delay discounting to understand impulsive choice in socially anxious individuals: failure to replicate.
作者信息
Jenks Charles W, Lawyer Steven R
出版信息
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;46:198-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.10.010.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Impulsive choice that follows transient anxiety responses is a potentially important outcome that may underlie maladaptive behavioral patterns that co-occur with high levels of social anxiety. However, little research has examined impulsive choice in relation to social anxiety. Rounds, Beck and Grant (2007; Behavior Research and Therapy, 45, 729–735) found that high social anxiety was associated with impulsive choice using a delay discounting procedure, but only in a non-threatening (control) condition, but several procedural confounds in that study may also explain the findings. The purpose of this study was to replicate Rounds et al. while controlling for potential procedural confounds.
METHODS
High- and low-social anxiety adult college-students with no substance abuse history were assigned randomly to a public speaking condition or a control (silent reading) condition. In the middle of the task, participants completed a measure of delay discounting, which measures impulsive choice.
RESULTS
Impulsive choice was not influenced by either social anxiety status or experimental condition.
LIMITATIONS
Other aspects of impulsive choice may be more sensitive to transient anxiety and fear. Higher state levels of social anxiety and transient anxiety may be necessary to detect a significant relationship with impulsive choice. Relatively high levels of impulsive responding may only occur in socially anxious individuals with current/historical substance abuse.
CONCLUSIONS
Neither anxiogenic laboratory procedures nor social anxiety status appear to influence impulsive choice as measured by the delay discounting task. Future research might consider examining whether transient anxiety influences other aspects of impulsive choice.
背景与目的
伴随短暂焦虑反应出现的冲动选择是一个潜在的重要结果,可能是与高水平社交焦虑同时出现的适应不良行为模式的基础。然而,很少有研究探讨与社交焦虑相关的冲动选择。朗兹、贝克和格兰特(2007年;《行为研究与治疗》,第45卷,第729 - 735页)发现,使用延迟折扣程序时,高社交焦虑与冲动选择有关,但仅在非威胁性(对照)条件下如此,不过该研究中的几个程序混淆因素也可能解释了这些结果。本研究的目的是在控制潜在程序混淆因素的同时重复朗兹等人的研究。
方法
将无药物滥用史的高社交焦虑和低社交焦虑成年大学生随机分配到公开演讲条件或对照(默读)条件。在任务进行过程中,参与者完成一项延迟折扣测量,该测量用于衡量冲动选择。
结果
冲动选择不受社交焦虑状态或实验条件的影响。
局限性
冲动选择的其他方面可能对短暂焦虑和恐惧更敏感。可能需要更高水平的社交焦虑状态和短暂焦虑才能检测到与冲动选择的显著关系。相对较高水平的冲动反应可能仅发生在有当前/既往药物滥用史的社交焦虑个体中。
结论
无论是致焦虑的实验室程序还是社交焦虑状态,似乎都不会影响通过延迟折扣任务测量的冲动选择。未来的研究可能会考虑探讨短暂焦虑是否会影响冲动选择的其他方面。