Lin Ru-Wei, Yang Chia-Ning, Ku ShengYu, Ho Cheng-Jung, Huang Shih-Bo, Yang Min-Chi, Chang Hsin-Wen, Lin Chun-Mao, Hwang Jaulang, Chen Yeh-Long, Tzeng Cherg-Chyi, Wang Chihuei
Bone and Joint Research Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan; Medical Device R & D Core Laboratory, National Cheng Kung University Medical College and Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.
Department of Life Sciences, National University of Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 2;9(12):e113832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113832. eCollection 2014.
CFS-1686 (chemical name (E)-N-(2-(diethylamino)ethyl)-4-(2-(2-(5-nitrofuran-2-yl)vinyl)quinolin-4-ylamino)benzamide) inhibits cell proliferation and triggers late apoptosis in prostate cancer cell lines. Comparing the effect of CFS-1686 on cell cycle progression with the topoisomerase 1 inhibitor camptothecin revealed that CFS-1686 and camptothecin reduced DNA synthesis in S-phase, resulting in cell cycle arrest at the intra-S phase and G1-S boundary, respectively. The DNA damage in CFS-1686 and camptothecin treated cells was evaluated by the level of ATM phosphorylation, γH2AX, and γH2AX foci, showing that camptothecin was more effective than CFS-1686. However, despite its lower DNA damage capacity, CFS-1686 demonstrated 4-fold higher inhibition of topoisomerase 1 than camptothecin in a DNA relaxation assay. Unlike camptothecin, CFS-1686 demonstrated no activity on topoisomerase 1 in a DNA cleavage assay, but nevertheless it reduced the camptothecin-induced DNA cleavage of topoisomerase 1 in a dose-dependent manner. Our results indicate that CFS-1686 might bind to topoisomerase 1 to inhibit this enzyme from interacting with DNA relaxation activity, unlike campothecin's induction of a topoisomerase 1-DNA cleavage complex. Finally, we used a computer docking strategy to localize the potential binding site of CFS-1686 to topoisomerase 1, further indicating that CFS-1686 might inhibit the binding of Top1 to DNA.
CFS-1686(化学名称为(E)-N-(2-(二乙氨基)乙基)-4-(2-(2-(5-硝基呋喃-2-基)乙烯基)喹啉-4-基氨基)苯甲酰胺)可抑制前列腺癌细胞系的细胞增殖并引发晚期凋亡。将CFS-1686对细胞周期进程的影响与拓扑异构酶1抑制剂喜树碱进行比较,结果显示CFS-1686和喜树碱均降低了S期的DNA合成,分别导致细胞周期停滞在S期内和G1-S边界。通过ATM磷酸化水平、γH2AX和γH2AX焦点评估CFS-1686和喜树碱处理细胞中的DNA损伤,结果表明喜树碱比CFS-1686更有效。然而,尽管CFS-1686的DNA损伤能力较低,但在DNA松弛试验中,其对拓扑异构酶1的抑制作用比喜树碱高4倍。与喜树碱不同,CFS-1686在DNA切割试验中对拓扑异构酶1无活性,但它仍以剂量依赖性方式降低了喜树碱诱导的拓扑异构酶1的DNA切割。我们的结果表明,与喜树碱诱导拓扑异构酶1-DNA切割复合物不同,CFS-1686可能与拓扑异构酶1结合,抑制该酶与DNA松弛活性的相互作用。最后,我们使用计算机对接策略来定位CFS-1686与拓扑异构酶1的潜在结合位点,进一步表明CFS-1686可能抑制Top1与DNA的结合。