Yang Jyh-Chin, Lin Chun-Jung, Wang Hong-Long, Chen Jin-De, Kao John Y, Shun Chia-Tung, Lu Chien-Wei, Lin Bor-Ru, Shieh Ming-Jium, Chang Ming-Chu, Chang Yu-Ting, Wei Shu-Chen, Lin Lin-Chih, Yeh Wen-Chun, Kuo Jen-Shin, Tung Chien-Chih, Leong Yew-Loong, Wang Teh-Hong, Wong Jau-Min
Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
School of Pharmacy, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 May;13(5):895-905.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.10.036. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The efficacy of treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection has decreased steadily because of increasing resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin. Resistance to amoxicillin is generally low, and high intragastric pH increases the efficacy of amoxicillin, so we investigated whether a combination of a high-dose proton pump inhibitor and amoxicillin (dual therapy) was more effective than standard first-line or rescue therapies in eradicating H pylori.
We performed a large-scale multihospital trial to compare the efficacy of a high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) with that of standard therapies in treatment-naive (n = 450) or treatment-experienced (n = 168) patients with H pylori infection. Treatment-naive patients were randomly assigned to groups given HDDT (rabeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 750 mg, 4 times/day for 14 days, group A1), sequential therapy for 10 days (group B1), or clarithromycin-containing triple therapy for 7 days (group C1). Treatment-experienced patients were randomly assigned to groups given HDDT for 14 days (group A2), sequential therapy for 10 days (B2), or levofloxacin-containing triple therapy for 7 days (C2). H pylori infection was detected by using the (13)C-urea breath test. We evaluated factors associated with treatment outcomes.
In the intention-to-treat analysis, H pylori was eradicated in 95.3% of patients in group A1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.9%-98.8%), 85.3% in B1 (95% CI, 79.6%-91.1%), and 80.7% in group C1 (95% CI, 74.3%-87.1%). Infection was eradicated in 89.3% of patients in group A2 (95% CI, 80.9%-97.6%), 51.8% in group B2 (95% CI, 38.3%-65.3%), and 78.6% (95% CI, 67.5%-89.7%) in group C2. The efficacy of HDDT was significantly higher than that of currently recommended regimens, irrespective of CYP2C19 genotype. Bacterial resistance to drugs was associated with treatment failure. There were no significant differences between groups in adverse events or patient adherence.
HDDT is superior to standard regimens as empirical first-line or rescue therapy for H pylori infection, with similar safety profiles and tolerability. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01163435.
由于对克拉霉素、甲硝唑和左氧氟沙星的耐药性不断增加,幽门螺杆菌感染的治疗效果一直在稳步下降。对阿莫西林的耐药性通常较低,且胃内高pH值可提高阿莫西林的疗效,因此我们研究了高剂量质子泵抑制剂与阿莫西林联合使用(双联疗法)在根除幽门螺杆菌方面是否比标准一线疗法或补救疗法更有效。
我们进行了一项大规模多中心试验,比较高剂量双联疗法(HDDT)与标准疗法对初治(n = 450)或复治(n = 168)幽门螺杆菌感染患者的疗效。初治患者被随机分为接受HDDT组(雷贝拉唑20 mg和阿莫西林750 mg,每日4次,共14天,A1组)、序贯疗法10天(B1组)或含克拉霉素三联疗法7天(C1组)。复治患者被随机分为接受HDDT 14天组(A2组)、序贯疗法10天(B2组)或含左氧氟沙星三联疗法7天(C2组)。采用(13)C-尿素呼气试验检测幽门螺杆菌感染。我们评估了与治疗结果相关的因素。
在意向性分析中,A1组95.3%的患者幽门螺杆菌被根除(95%置信区间[CI],91.9%-98.8%),B1组为85.3%(95% CI,79.6%-91.1%),C1组为80.7%(95% CI,74.3%-87.1%)。A2组89.3%的患者感染被根除(95% CI,80.9%-97.6%),B2组为51.8%(95% CI,38.3%-65.3%),C2组为78.6%(95% CI,67.5%-89.7%)。无论CYP2C19基因型如何,HDDT的疗效均显著高于目前推荐的方案。细菌对药物的耐药性与治疗失败相关。各组不良事件或患者依从性之间无显著差异。
HDDT作为幽门螺杆菌感染的经验性一线或补救治疗优于标准方案,安全性和耐受性相似。ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT01163435。