Lavdas Eleftherios, Mavroidis Panayiotis, Kostopoulos Spiros, Ninos Constantin, Strikou Aspasia-Dimitra, Glotsos Dimitrios, Vlachopoulou Anna, Oikonomou Georgia, Economopoulos Nikolaos, Roka Violeta, Sakkas Georgios K, Tsagkalis Antonios, Stathakis Sotirios, Papanikolaou Nikos, Batsikas Georgios
Department of Medical Radiological Technologists, Technological Education Institute of Athens, Greece.
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA; Department of Medical Physics, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Feb;33(2):194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.10.014. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
To assess the efficacy of the BLADE technique (MR imaging with 'rotating blade-like k-space covering') to significantly reduce motion, truncation, flow and other artifacts in cervical spine compared to the conventional technique.
In eighty consecutive subjects, who had been routinely scanned for cervical spine examination, the following pairs of sequences were compared: a) T2 TSE SAG vs. T2 TSE SAG BLADE and b) T2 TIRM SAG vs. T2 TIRM SAG BLADE. A quantitative analysis was performed using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measures. A qualitative analysis was also performed by two radiologists, who graded seven image characteristics on a 5-point scale (0: non-visualization; 1: poor; 2: average; 3: good; 4: excellent). The observers also evaluated the presence of image artifacts (motion, truncation, flow, indentation).
In quantitative analysis, the CNR values of the CSF/SC between TIRM SAG and TIRM SAG BLADE were found to present statistically significant differences (p < 0.001). Regarding motion and truncation artifacts, the T2 TSE BLADE SAG was superior compared to the T2 TSE SAG, and the T2 TIRM BLADE SAG was superior compared to the T2 TIRM SAG. Regarding flow artifacts, T2 TIRM BLADE SAG eliminated more artifacts than T2 TIRM SAG.
In cervical spine MRI, BLADE sequences appear to significantly reduce motion, truncation and flow artifacts and improve image quality. BLADE sequences are proposed to be used for uncooperative subjects. Nevertheless, more research needs to be done by testing additional specific pathologies.
评估BLADE技术(采用“旋转刀片样k空间覆盖”的磁共振成像)与传统技术相比,在显著减少颈椎运动、截断、血流及其他伪影方面的有效性。
在连续80例接受颈椎常规扫描检查的受试者中,比较以下序列对:a)T2 TSE矢状位与T2 TSE矢状位BLADE序列,以及b)T2 TIRM矢状位与T2 TIRM矢状位BLADE序列。采用信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)测量进行定量分析。两名放射科医生也进行了定性分析,他们对七个图像特征按5分制评分(0分:未显示;1分:差;2分:一般;3分:好;4分:优)。观察者还评估了图像伪影(运动、截断、血流、压迹)的存在情况。
在定量分析中,发现TIRM矢状位与TIRM矢状位BLADE序列之间脑脊液/脊髓的CNR值存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.001)。关于运动和截断伪影,T2 TSE BLADE矢状位序列优于T2 TSE矢状位序列,T2 TIRM BLADE矢状位序列优于T2 TIRM矢状位序列。关于血流伪影,T2 TIRM BLADE矢状位序列比T2 TIRM矢状位序列消除的伪影更多。
在颈椎磁共振成像中,BLADE序列似乎能显著减少运动、截断和血流伪影并提高图像质量。建议将BLADE序列用于不配合的受试者。然而,需要通过测试更多特定病理情况进行更多研究。