El-Jardali Fadi, Bou-Karroum Lama, Ataya Nour, El-Ghali Hana Addam, Hammoud Rawan
Department of Health Management and Policy, American University of Beirut, PO Box 11-0236, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon; Knowledge to Policy (K2P) Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, PO Box 11-0236, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon; Center for Systematic Reviews of Health Policy and Systems Research (SPARK), American University of Beirut, PO Box 11-0236, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon; Research, Advocacy and Public Policy-making Program, Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy and International Affairs, American University of Beirut, PO Box 11-0236, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, CRL-209, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada.
Department of Health Management and Policy, American University of Beirut, PO Box 11-0236, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Dec;123:45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.044. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
Public policymaking is complex and suffers from limited uptake of research evidence, particularly in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR). In-depth case studies examining health policymaking in the EMR are lacking. This retrospective policy analysis aims at generating insights about how policies are being made, identifying factors influencing policymaking and assessing to what extent evidence is used in this process by using the Lebanese Voluntary Health Insurance policy as a case study. The study examined the policymaking process through a policy tracing technique that covered a period of 12 years. The study employed a qualitative research design using a case study approach and was conducted in two phases over the course of two years. Data was collected using multiple sources including: 1) a comprehensive and chronological media review; 2) twenty-two key informant interviews with policymakers, stakeholders, and journalists; and 3) a document review of legislations, minutes of meetings, actuarial studies, and official documents. Data was analyzed and validated using thematic analysis. Findings showed that the voluntary health insurance policy was a political decision taken by the government to tackle an urgent political problem. Evidence was not used to guide policy development and implementation and policy implementers and other stakeholders were not involved in policy development. Factors influencing policymaking were political interests, sectarianism, urgency, and values of policymakers. Barriers to the use of evidence were lack of policy-relevant research evidence, political context, personal interests, and resource constraints. Findings suggest that policymakers should be made more aware of the important role of evidence in informing public policymaking and the need for building capacity to develop, implement and evaluate policies. Study findings are likely to matter in light of the changes that are unfolding in some Arab countries and the looming opportunities for policy reforms.
公共政策制定过程复杂,且存在研究证据采纳有限的问题,在东地中海区域(EMR)尤为如此。目前缺乏对东地中海区域卫生政策制定的深入案例研究。本回顾性政策分析旨在通过以黎巴嫩自愿医疗保险政策为例,深入了解政策制定过程,识别影响政策制定的因素,并评估在此过程中证据的使用程度。该研究通过一项涵盖12年的政策追踪技术来审视政策制定过程。研究采用定性研究设计,运用案例研究方法,分两个阶段在两年内完成。数据收集采用多种来源,包括:1)全面且按时间顺序的媒体回顾;2)对政策制定者、利益相关者和记者进行的22次关键信息访谈;3)对立法、会议记录、精算研究和官方文件的文献回顾。数据通过主题分析进行分析和验证。研究结果表明,自愿医疗保险政策是政府为解决紧迫政治问题而做出的一项政治决策。证据未被用于指导政策制定和实施,政策实施者及其他利益相关者未参与政策制定。影响政策制定的因素包括政治利益、宗派主义、紧迫性以及政策制定者的价值观。证据使用的障碍包括缺乏与政策相关的研究证据、政治背景、个人利益和资源限制。研究结果表明,应让政策制定者更加意识到证据在为公共政策提供信息方面的重要作用,以及建设制定、实施和评估政策能力的必要性。鉴于一些阿拉伯国家正在发生的变化以及迫在眉睫的政策改革机遇,研究结果可能具有重要意义。