Liver Failure Group, Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Data Management Center, EASL-CLIF Consortium, Barcelona, Spain.
J Hepatol. 2015 Apr;62(4):831-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cirrhotic patients with acute decompensation frequently develop acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), which is associated with high mortality rates. Recently, a specific score for these patients has been developed using the CANONIC study database. The aims of this study were to develop and validate the CLIF-C AD score, a specific prognostic score for hospitalised cirrhotic patients with acute decompensation (AD), but without ACLF, and to compare this with the Child-Pugh, MELD, and MELD-Na scores.
The derivation set included 1016 CANONIC study patients without ACLF. Proportional hazards models considering liver transplantation as a competing risk were used to identify score parameters. Estimated coefficients were used as relative weights to compute the CLIF-C ADs. External validation was performed in 225 cirrhotic AD patients. CLIF-C ADs was also tested for sequential use.
Age, serum sodium, white-cell count, creatinine and INR were selected as the best predictors of mortality. The C-index for prediction of mortality was better for CLIF-C ADs compared with Child-Pugh, MELD, and MELD-Nas at predicting 3- and 12-month mortality in the derivation, internal validation and the external dataset. CLIF-C ADs improved in its ability to predict 3-month mortality using data from days 2, 3-7, and 8-15 (C-index: 0.72, 0.75, and 0.77 respectively).
The new CLIF-C ADs is more accurate than other liver scores in predicting prognosis in hospitalised cirrhotic patients without ACLF. CLIF-C ADs therefore may be used to identify a high-risk cohort for intensive management and a low-risk group that may be discharged early.
伴有急性失代偿的肝硬化患者常发生慢加急性肝衰竭(ACLF),其死亡率较高。最近,CANONIC 研究数据库中开发了一种特定的评分系统来评估此类患者。本研究旨在开发和验证 CLIF-C AD 评分,这是一种针对住院肝硬化急性失代偿(AD)但无 ACLF 患者的特定预后评分,并与 Child-Pugh、MELD 和 MELD-Na 评分进行比较。
在不伴有 ACLF 的情况下,从 CANONIC 研究中纳入了 1016 例肝硬化 AD 患者作为推导集。使用考虑肝移植作为竞争风险的比例风险模型来识别评分参数。估计系数被用作计算 CLIF-C AD 的相对权重。在 225 例肝硬化 AD 患者中进行了外部验证。还测试了 CLIF-C AD 的连续使用。
年龄、血清钠、白细胞计数、肌酐和 INR 被选为死亡率的最佳预测因子。与 Child-Pugh、MELD 和 MELD-Na 相比,CLIF-C AD 在预测推导、内部验证和外部数据集的 3 个月和 12 个月死亡率方面具有更好的预测死亡率的 C 指数。CLIF-C AD 可通过使用第 2、3-7 和 8-15 天的数据来提高预测 3 个月死亡率的能力(C 指数:0.72、0.75 和 0.77)。
新的 CLIF-C AD 评分在预测无 ACLF 的住院肝硬化患者的预后方面比其他肝脏评分更准确。因此,CLIF-C AD 可用于识别高危患者以进行强化管理,并识别可能提前出院的低危患者。