Suppr超能文献

[象限撑开器下开窗单侧减压与开放减压融合内固定治疗腰椎管狭窄症疗效的病例对照研究]

[Case-control study on therapeutic effects between unilateral decompression via fenestration under Quadrant retractor and open decompression technique with fusion and internal fixation for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis].

作者信息

Wen Tian-lin, Liu Xiu-mei, Du Pei, Zhang Tian-yang, Wang Fei, Li Fang

出版信息

Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2014 Aug;27(8):658-62.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare therapeutic effects between unilateral decompression technique only and open decompression technique with fusion and internal fixation for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

METHODS

From March 2008 to February 2011, 82 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis were treated with operations, and divided into two groups. There were 13 males and 19 females in group A, with a mean age of (56.31±4.31) years old. The patients in group A were treated with unilateral decompression via fenestration technique only, including 23 patients obtaining single level decompression and 9 patients obtaining two levels decompression. In group B, there were 18 males and 32 females, with a mean age of (57.53±4.28) years old. The patients in group B were treated with open decompressive technique with fusion and internal fixation, including 38 patients obtaining single level decompression and 12 patients obtaining two levels decompression. The VAS of back pain and leg pain, ODI were recorded before and after surgery to evaluate low back pain,leg pain and walking tolerance.

RESULTS

All the patients were followed up, and the duration ranged from 10.9 to 43.4 months,with a mean of 32.8 months. There were no differences in age, stenosis level, VAS of back and leg pain and ODI before surgery between two groups. Compared with the corresponding ones in group B, the operation time, blood loss, hospitalization time,recovery time of routine daily life and finacial expenditure of patients were all shorter or less in group A. There was no statistically difference in complications between two groups.

CONCLUSION

"Unilateral decompression via fenestration technique" is a less invasive and more effective decompressive technique for degenerative spinal stenosis without posterior elements damage. It has advantages in operation time, blood loss, hospitalization time, recovery to daily life and financial expenditure. When controlling the operative indications strictly, the technique could be an important procedure for surgical treatment of degenerative spinal stenosis, especially in the elderly population.

摘要

目的

比较单纯单侧减压技术与开放减压融合内固定技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效。

方法

2008年3月至2011年2月,82例腰椎管狭窄症患者接受手术治疗,分为两组。A组男13例,女19例,平均年龄(56.31±4.31)岁。A组患者仅采用开窗技术行单侧减压,其中23例患者接受单节段减压,9例患者接受双节段减压。B组男18例,女32例,平均年龄(57.53±4.28)岁。B组患者采用开放减压融合内固定技术治疗,其中38例患者接受单节段减压,12例患者接受双节段减压。记录手术前后背痛和腿痛的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、腰椎功能障碍指数(ODI),以评估腰痛、腿痛及行走耐受情况。

结果

所有患者均获随访,随访时间10.9~43.4个月,平均32.8个月。两组患者术前年龄、狭窄节段、背痛和腿痛VAS及ODI比较,差异无统计学意义。与B组相比,A组患者手术时间、出血量、住院时间、日常生活恢复时间及费用均较短或较少。两组并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义。

结论

“开窗单侧减压技术”是一种治疗退变性椎管狭窄且不损伤后方结构的微创、有效的减压技术。在手术时间、出血量、住院时间、日常生活恢复及费用方面具有优势。严格掌握手术适应证时,该技术可成为退变性椎管狭窄症手术治疗的重要术式,尤其适用于老年患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验