Lin Bin, Lin Qiu-Yan, He Ming-Chang, Liu Hui, Guo Zhi-Min, Lin Kun-Shan
Department of Orthopaedics, the 175th Hospital of PLA, Zhangzhou 363000, Fujian, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2012 Jun;25(6):468-73.
To compare the clinical effects of unilateral pedicle screw fixation (uni-PS) assisted by Quadrant system and bilateral pedicle screw fixation (bi-PS) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.
From October 2008 to October 2010,102 patients with lower back pain, unilateral lower limb radiating pain or paraesthesia were treated with pedicle screw fixation and lumbar interbody fusion. There were 67 males and 35 females with an average age of 51.5 years ranging from 34 to 69 years. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (group A and group B) according to the internal fixation type. The patients of group A (n=50) underwent with minimally transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and unilateral pedicle screw fixation with one single cage placement assisted by Quadrant system;and the patients of group B (n = 52) underwent with posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and bilateral pedicle screw fixation with one single cage placement. There were no significant differences between two groups in general information (P > 0.05). VAS score and ODI score system were used to evaluate the preoperative and postoperative pain and function recovery. Operative time, volume of blood loss, fusion rate and complication rate were compared and analyzed by statistical test.
All the patients were followed up from 12 to 21 months with an average of 18.2 months. In the group A,operative time and volume of blood loss were (87.6 +/- 25.5) min and (105.7 +/- 27.2) ml, respectively; VAS score of low back pain and leg pain, ODI score decreased respectively from preoperative 7.2 +/- 1.4, 7.9 +/- 1.1, 42.2 +/- 11.8 to 3.2 +/- 0.6, 3.0 +/- 0.7,15.6 +/- 2.3 at one month after operation; the fusion rate was 96.0% (48/50) and the complication rate was 4.00% (2/50). In the group B,operative time and volume of blood loss were (160.3 +/- 20.5) min and (220.6 +/- 25.5) ml, respectively; VAS score of low back pain and leg pain, ODI score decreased respectively from preoperative 7.3 +/- 1.1, 8.1 +/- 0.9, 43.1 +/- 12.0 to 3.3 +/- 0.4, 3.2 +/- 0.3, 14.9 +/- 2.6; the fusion rate was 96.2% (50/52) and the compli- cation rate was 5.77% (3/52). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in fusion rate, complication rate, VAS pain and ODI score. Whereas the operative time and blood loss in group A were significantly lower than that of group B.
Minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screw fixation is a safe and feasible method for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. It is as effective as the bilateral fixation in lumbar spinal fusion. In addition, it has the advantages of short operative time, less volume of blood loss, high fusion rate, etc.
比较Quadrant系统辅助下单侧椎弓根螺钉固定(uni-PS)与双侧椎弓根螺钉固定(bi-PS)治疗腰椎退变性疾病的临床效果。
2008年10月至2010年10月,对102例伴有下腰痛、单侧下肢放射性疼痛或麻木的患者行椎弓根螺钉固定及腰椎椎间融合术。其中男性67例,女性35例,平均年龄51.5岁,年龄范围34~69岁。根据内固定类型将患者随机分为两组(A组和B组)。A组(n = 50)行微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)及Quadrant系统辅助下单侧椎弓根螺钉固定并植入1枚椎间融合器;B组(n = 52)行后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)及双侧椎弓根螺钉固定并植入1枚椎间融合器。两组患者一般资料比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)和腰椎功能障碍指数(ODI)评分系统评估术前及术后疼痛情况及功能恢复情况。对手术时间、失血量、融合率及并发症发生率进行统计分析比较。
所有患者均获随访,随访时间12~21个月,平均18.2个月。A组手术时间及失血量分别为(87.6 ± 25.5)min和(105.7 ± 27.2)ml;术后1个月时,下腰痛VAS评分、腿痛VAS评分及ODI评分分别由术前的7.2 ± 1.4、7.9 ± 1.1、42.2 ± 11.8降至3.2 ± 0.6、3.0 ± 0.7、15.6 ± 2.3;融合率为96.0%(48/50),并发症发生率为4.00%(2/50)。B组手术时间及失血量分别为(160.3 ± 20.5)min和(220.6 ± 25.5)ml;术后1个月时,下腰痛VAS评分、腿痛VAS评分及ODI评分分别由术前的7.3 ± 1.1、8.1 ± 0.9、43.1 ± 12.0降至3.3 ± 0.4、3.2 ± 0.3、14.9 ± 2.6;融合率为96.2%(50/52),并发症发生率为5.77%(3/52)。两组融合率、并发症发生率、VAS疼痛评分及ODI评分比较差异无统计学意义。而A组手术时间及失血量明显低于B组。
微创单侧椎弓根螺钉固定治疗腰椎退变性疾病安全可行。在腰椎融合方面与双侧固定效果相当。此外,还具有手术时间短、失血量少、融合率高等优点。