Hjortø L, Ettema J F, Kargo M, Sørensen A C
Knowledge Centre for Agriculture, Agro Food Park 15, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
SimHerd A/S, Agro Business Park, Niels Pedersens Alle 2, 8830 Tjele, Denmark; Department of Animal Science, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, PO Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Jan;98(1):646-58. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8401. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
Until now, genomic information has mainly been used to improve the accuracy of genomic breeding values for breeding animals at a population level. However, we hypothesize that the use of information from genotyped females also opens up the possibility of reducing genetic lag in a dairy herd, especially if genomic tests are used in combination with sexed semen or a high management level for reproductive performance, because both factors provide the opportunity for generating a reproductive surplus in the herd. In this study, sexed semen is used in combination with beef semen to produce high-value crossbred beef calves. Thus, on average there is no surplus of and selection among replacement heifers whether to go into the herd or to be sold. In this situation, the selection opportunities arise when deciding which cows to inseminate with sexed semen, conventional semen, or beef semen. We tested the hypothesis by combining the results of 2 stochastic simulation programs, SimHerd and ADAM. SimHerd estimates the economic effect of different strategies for use of sexed semen and beef semen at 3 levels of reproductive performance in a dairy herd. Besides simulating the operational return, SimHerd also simulates the parity distribution of the dams of heifer calves. The ADAM program estimates genetic merit per year in a herd under different strategies for use of sexed semen and genomic tests. The annual net return per slot was calculated as the sum of operational return and value of genetic lag minus costs of genomic tests divided by the total number of slots. Our results showed that the use of genomic tests for decision making decreases genetic lag by as much as 0.14 genetic standard deviation units of the breeding goal and that genetic lag decreases even more (up to 0.30 genetic standard deviation units) when genomic tests are used in combination with strategies for increasing and using a reproductive surplus. Thus, our hypothesis was supported. We also observed that genomic tests are used most efficiently to decrease genetic lag when the genomic information is used more than once in the lifetime of an animal and when as many selection decisions as possible are based on genomic information. However, all breakeven prices were lower than or equal to €50, which is the current price of low-density chip genotyping in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden, so in the vast majority of cases, it is not profitable to genotype routinely for management purposes under the present price assumptions.
到目前为止,基因组信息主要用于在群体水平上提高种畜基因组育种值的准确性。然而,我们推测,利用经基因分型的母牛的信息也为减少奶牛群的遗传滞后提供了可能性,特别是当基因组检测与性别分选精液或高水平的繁殖性能管理相结合时,因为这两个因素都为在牛群中产生繁殖盈余提供了机会。在本研究中,性别分选精液与肉牛精液结合使用,以生产高价值的杂交肉牛犊。因此,平均而言,在后备小母牛进入牛群或出售的选择上没有盈余。在这种情况下,选择机会出现在决定用性别分选精液、常规精液还是肉牛精液对哪些母牛进行授精时。我们通过结合两个随机模拟程序SimHerd和ADAM的结果来验证这一假设。SimHerd估计了奶牛群中在三种繁殖性能水平下使用性别分选精液和肉牛精液的不同策略的经济效果。除了模拟运营回报外,SimHerd还模拟了小母牛犊母亲的胎次分布。ADAM程序估计了在使用性别分选精液和基因组检测的不同策略下牛群每年的遗传价值。每个畜栏的年净回报计算为运营回报与遗传滞后价值之和减去基因组检测成本,再除以畜栏总数。我们的结果表明,使用基因组检测进行决策可将遗传滞后降低多达育种目标的0.14个遗传标准差单位,当基因组检测与增加和利用繁殖盈余的策略结合使用时,遗传滞后降低得更多(高达0.30个遗传标准差单位)。因此,我们的假设得到了支持。我们还观察到,当基因组信息在动物一生中多次使用且尽可能多的选择决策基于基因组信息时,基因组检测用于减少遗传滞后的效率最高。然而,所有盈亏平衡价格都低于或等于50欧元,这是丹麦、芬兰和瑞典目前低密度芯片基因分型的价格,因此在目前的价格假设下,绝大多数情况下出于管理目的进行常规基因分型是无利可图的。