Czerwonka Anna I, Herridge Margaret S, Chan Linda, Chu Leslie Michele, Matte Andrea, Cameron Jill I
Department of Occupational Sciences and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1 V7, Canada.
University Health Network, NCSB 11C-1180, Toronto, ON, M5G 2 N2, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.
J Crit Care. 2015 Apr;30(2):242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
Survivors of complex critical illness and their family caregivers require support during their recovery, rehabilitation, and return to community living; however, the nature of these supports and how they may change over time remain unclear. Using the Timing It Right framework as a conceptual guide, this qualitative pilot study explored survivors' and caregivers' needs during the episode of critical illness through their return to independent living.
Five survivors and seven family caregivers were recruited and consented from the main Towards RECOVER pilot study, designed to characterize the long term outcomes of survivors of the ICU who have been mechanically ventilated for more than one week. Using the Timing It Right framework, we prospectively conducted qualitative interviews to explore participants' experiences and needs for information, emotional support, and training at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge. We completed 26 interviews, which were audio recorded, professionally transcribed, checked for accuracy, and analyzed using framework methodology.
In this small pilot sample, caregiver and patient perspectives were related and, therefore, are presented together. We identified 1 overriding theme: survivors do not experience continuity of medical care during recovery after critical illness. Three subthemes highlighted the following: (1) informational needs change across the care continuum, (2) fear and worry exist when families do not know what to expect, and (3) survivors transition from dependence to independence.
Interventions designed to improve family outcomes after critical illness should address both survivors' and caregivers' support needs as they change across the illness and recovery trajectory. Providing early intervention and support and clarifying expectations for transitions in care and recovery may decrease fears of the unknown for both caregivers and survivors. Ongoing family-centered follow-up programs may also help survivors regain independence and help caregivers manage their perceived responsibility for the patients' health. Using these insights for intervention development could ultimately improve long-term outcomes for both survivors and caregivers.
复杂危重症幸存者及其家庭照顾者在康复、恢复和回归社区生活期间需要支持;然而,这些支持的性质以及它们如何随时间变化仍不明确。本定性试点研究以“适时介入”框架为概念指南,探讨了危重症发作期间至恢复独立生活阶段幸存者和照顾者的需求。
从主要的“迈向康复”试点研究中招募了5名幸存者和7名家庭照顾者并获得其同意,该研究旨在描述接受机械通气超过一周的重症监护病房(ICU)幸存者的长期结局。我们以“适时介入”框架为指导,前瞻性地进行定性访谈,以探讨参与者在重症监护病房(ICU)出院后3个月、6个月、12个月和24个月时对信息、情感支持和培训的经历与需求。我们共完成了26次访谈,访谈进行了录音、专业转录、准确性核对,并采用框架分析法进行分析。
在这个小样本试点中,照顾者和患者的观点相互关联,因此一并呈现。我们确定了一个首要主题:幸存者在危重症康复期间未经历医疗护理的连续性。三个子主题突出了以下内容:(1)信息需求在整个护理连续过程中发生变化,(2)当家人不知道会发生什么时会存在恐惧和担忧,(3)幸存者从依赖过渡到独立。
旨在改善危重症后家庭结局的干预措施应满足幸存者和照顾者在疾病和康复过程中不断变化的支持需求。提供早期干预和支持,并明确护理和康复过渡的期望,可能会减少照顾者和幸存者对未知的恐惧。持续的以家庭为中心的随访计划也可能有助于幸存者恢复独立,并帮助照顾者管理他们对患者健康的感知责任。利用这些见解来制定干预措施最终可能会改善幸存者和照顾者的长期结局。