• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同面部类型中短面型、中面型和长面型个体对颊间隙的认知。

Perceptions of brachyfacial, mesofacial and dolichofacial individuals with regard to the buccal corridor in different facial types.

作者信息

Pithon Matheus Melo, Mata Kayure Rocha da, Rocha Karina Silva, Costa Brenda do Nascimento, Neves Fernando, Barbosa George Caique Gouveia, Coqueiro Raildo da Silva

机构信息

Departament of Health I, Southwest Bahia State University, Jequié, Bahia, Brazil.

出版信息

J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Sep-Oct;22(5):382-9. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720140003.

DOI:10.1590/1678-775720140003
PMID:25466472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4245749/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the esthetic perception and attractiveness of the smile with regard to the buccal corridor in different facial types by brachyfacial, mesofacial and dolichofacial individuals.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The image of a smiling individual with a mesofacial type of face was changed to create three different facial types with five different buccal corridors (2%, 10%, 15%, 22% and 28%). To achieve this effect, a photo editing software was used (Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Systems Inc, San Francisco, CA, EUA). The images were submitted to evaluators with brachyfacial, mesofacial and dolichofacial types of faces, who evaluated the degree of esthetic perception and attractiveness by means of a visual analog scale measuring 70 mm. The differences between evaluators were verified by the Mann-Whitney test. All statistics were performed with a confidence level of 95%.

RESULTS

Brachyfacial individuals perceived mesofacial and dolichofacial types of faces with buccal corridor of 2% as more attractive. Mesofacial individuals perceived mesofacial and dolichofacial types of faces with buccal corridor of 2%, 10% and 15% as more attractive. Dolichofacial individuals perceived the mesofacial type of face with buccal corridor of 2% as more attractive. Evaluators of the female sex generally attributed higher scores than the male evaluators.

CONCLUSION

To achieve an enhanced esthetic smile it is necessary to observe the patient's facial type. The preference for narrow buccal corridors is an esthetic characteristic preferred by men and women, and wide buccal corridors are less attractive.

摘要

目的

通过短面型、中面型和长面型个体,评估微笑在不同面部类型中关于颊间隙的美学感知和吸引力。

材料与方法

将一名中面型面部的微笑个体图像进行修改,以创建具有五种不同颊间隙(2%、10%、15%、22%和28%)的三种不同面部类型。为实现此效果,使用了一款照片编辑软件(Adobe Photoshop,Adobe Systems Inc,旧金山,加利福尼亚州,美国)。将图像提交给短面型、中面型和长面型面部的评估者,他们通过一个70毫米的视觉模拟量表评估美学感知程度和吸引力。评估者之间的差异通过曼 - 惠特尼检验进行验证。所有统计分析的置信水平为95%。

结果

短面型个体认为颊间隙为2%的中面型和长面型面部更具吸引力。中面型个体认为颊间隙为2%、10%和15%的中面型和长面型面部更具吸引力。长面型个体认为颊间隙为2%的中面型面部更具吸引力。女性评估者通常比男性评估者给出更高的分数。

结论

为获得更美观的笑容,有必要观察患者的面部类型。对窄颊间隙的偏好是男性和女性都偏爱的美学特征,而宽颊间隙则吸引力较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13a/4245749/77d678748397/jaos-22-05-0382-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13a/4245749/8855236748e7/jaos-22-05-0382-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13a/4245749/c51674a6b6c9/jaos-22-05-0382-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13a/4245749/264c220b090c/jaos-22-05-0382-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13a/4245749/77d678748397/jaos-22-05-0382-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13a/4245749/8855236748e7/jaos-22-05-0382-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13a/4245749/c51674a6b6c9/jaos-22-05-0382-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13a/4245749/264c220b090c/jaos-22-05-0382-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13a/4245749/77d678748397/jaos-22-05-0382-g04.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptions of brachyfacial, mesofacial and dolichofacial individuals with regard to the buccal corridor in different facial types.不同面部类型中短面型、中面型和长面型个体对颊间隙的认知。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Sep-Oct;22(5):382-9. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720140003.
2
Smile attractiveness related to buccal corridor space in 3 different facial types: A perception of 3 ethnic groups of Malaysians.不同面型的颊廊空间与微笑美观的相关性:对 3 个马来西亚族群的感知。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Aug;120(2):252-256. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.021. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
3
Perceptions of orthodontists, laypersons, and patients regarding buccal corridors and facial types.正畸医生、非专业人士和患者对颊廊和面型的看法。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Jan;161(1):92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.06.051. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
4
The Influence of the Smile on the Perceived Facial Type Esthetics.微笑对面部类型审美的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jul 9;2018:3562916. doi: 10.1155/2018/3562916. eCollection 2018.
5
Buccal corridors and smile esthetics.颊侧间隙与微笑美学
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Feb;127(2):208-13; quiz 261. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.11.027.
6
Smile attractiveness perception regarding buccal corridor size among different facial types.不同脸型中颊廊大小对微笑吸引力的感知
Dent Med Probl. 2018 Jul-Sep;55(3):305-312. doi: 10.17219/dmp/92634.
7
Evaluation of the effect of buccal corridor size on smile attractiveness.颊廊大小对笑容吸引力影响的评估。
Eur J Esthet Dent. 2010 Winter;5(4):370-80.
8
Median mandibular flexure at different mouth opening and its relation to different facial types: A prospective clinical study.不同开口度下的下颌正中弯曲及其与不同面型的关系:一项前瞻性临床研究。
J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2013 Jul;4(2):426-30. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.117028.
9
Perceptions of laypersons and orthodontists regarding the buccal corridor in long- and short-face individuals.非专业人士和正畸医生对长面型和短面型患者颊廊的认知。
Angle Orthod. 2011 Jan;81(1):86-90. doi: 10.2319/031210-145.1.
10
Evaluation of Mandibular First Molars' Axial Inclination and Alveolar Morphology in Different Facial Patterns: A CBCT Study.不同面型下颌第一磨牙轴向倾斜度及牙槽形态的评估:一项CBCT研究
Eur J Dent. 2020 Mar;14(2):250-259. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709932. Epub 2020 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Midline Deviation and Crown Width Disproportion on Perception of Smile Esthetics.中线偏移和冠宽度比例失调对微笑美学感知的影响。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Sep;37(9):2116-2124. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13492. Epub 2025 May 23.
2
The impact of dentofacial characteristics and malocclusions on dissatisfaction with dentofacial appearance.牙颌面特征和错颌畸形对面部外观不满意的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Nov 28;28(12):661. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06060-z.
3
Effects of different tooth movement patterns and aligner thicknesses on maxillary arch expansion with clear aligners: a three-dimensional finite element study.

本文引用的文献

1
Perception of laypersons and dental professionals and students as regards the aesthetic impact of gingival plastic surgery.非专业人士和口腔专业人士及学生对牙龈整形手术美观影响的看法。
Eur J Orthod. 2014 Apr;36(2):173-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt020. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
2
Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of profile esthetics between white and black evaluators.白人及黑人评价者使用照片与剪影评估侧面美观度的比较
Angle Orthod. 2014 Mar;84(2):231-8. doi: 10.2319/051513-373.1. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
3
Evaluation of the susceptibility to pigmentation of orthodontic esthetic elastomeric ligatures.
不同牙齿移动模式和矫治器厚度对使用透明矫治器进行上颌牙弓扩展的影响:一项三维有限元研究
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Jun 25;12:1424319. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1424319. eCollection 2024.
4
Perception of Dental Students and Laypersons to Altered Dentofacial Aesthetics.牙科学生和外行人对牙颌面美学改变的认知。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019 Nov 11;10(1):85-95. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_340_19. eCollection 2020 Jan-Feb.
5
The Influence of the Smile on the Perceived Facial Type Esthetics.微笑对面部类型审美的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jul 9;2018:3562916. doi: 10.1155/2018/3562916. eCollection 2018.
正畸美学弹性结扎丝色素沉着易感性评估
Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 Mar 15;18(2):20.e1-8. doi: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000200008.
4
Esthetic perception of black spaces between maxillary central incisors by different age groups.不同年龄组对上颌中切牙之间黑三角的美学感知。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Mar;143(3):371-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.10.020.
5
Perception of the esthetic impact of gingival smile on laypersons, dental professionals, and dental students.非专业人士、牙科专业人士和牙科学生对牙龈微笑的美学影响的感知。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Apr;115(4):448-54. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.04.027. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
6
Perception of the esthetic impact of mandibular incisor extraction treatment on laypersons, dental professionals, and dental students.非专业人士、牙科专业人士和牙科学生对下颌切牙拔牙治疗的审美影响的看法。
Angle Orthod. 2012 Jul;82(4):732-8. doi: 10.2319/081611-521.1. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
7
Perceptions of Jordanian laypersons and dental professionals to altered smile aesthetics.约旦非专业人士和牙科专业人士对改变微笑美学的看法。
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Aug;33(4):450-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq100. Epub 2010 Nov 1.
8
Influence of orthodontic treatment, midline position, buccal corridor and smile arc on smile attractiveness.正畸治疗、中线位置、颊廊和微笑弧对微笑吸引力的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2011 Jan;81(1):153-61. doi: 10.2319/040710-195.1.
9
Perceptions of laypersons and orthodontists regarding the buccal corridor in long- and short-face individuals.非专业人士和正畸医生对长面型和短面型患者颊廊的认知。
Angle Orthod. 2011 Jan;81(1):86-90. doi: 10.2319/031210-145.1.
10
Effects of buccal corridors on smile esthetics in Japanese.颊间隙对日本人微笑美学的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2009 Jul;79(4):628-33. doi: 10.2319/080708-410.1.