Suppr超能文献

不同面部类型中短面型、中面型和长面型个体对颊间隙的认知。

Perceptions of brachyfacial, mesofacial and dolichofacial individuals with regard to the buccal corridor in different facial types.

作者信息

Pithon Matheus Melo, Mata Kayure Rocha da, Rocha Karina Silva, Costa Brenda do Nascimento, Neves Fernando, Barbosa George Caique Gouveia, Coqueiro Raildo da Silva

机构信息

Departament of Health I, Southwest Bahia State University, Jequié, Bahia, Brazil.

出版信息

J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Sep-Oct;22(5):382-9. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720140003.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the esthetic perception and attractiveness of the smile with regard to the buccal corridor in different facial types by brachyfacial, mesofacial and dolichofacial individuals.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The image of a smiling individual with a mesofacial type of face was changed to create three different facial types with five different buccal corridors (2%, 10%, 15%, 22% and 28%). To achieve this effect, a photo editing software was used (Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Systems Inc, San Francisco, CA, EUA). The images were submitted to evaluators with brachyfacial, mesofacial and dolichofacial types of faces, who evaluated the degree of esthetic perception and attractiveness by means of a visual analog scale measuring 70 mm. The differences between evaluators were verified by the Mann-Whitney test. All statistics were performed with a confidence level of 95%.

RESULTS

Brachyfacial individuals perceived mesofacial and dolichofacial types of faces with buccal corridor of 2% as more attractive. Mesofacial individuals perceived mesofacial and dolichofacial types of faces with buccal corridor of 2%, 10% and 15% as more attractive. Dolichofacial individuals perceived the mesofacial type of face with buccal corridor of 2% as more attractive. Evaluators of the female sex generally attributed higher scores than the male evaluators.

CONCLUSION

To achieve an enhanced esthetic smile it is necessary to observe the patient's facial type. The preference for narrow buccal corridors is an esthetic characteristic preferred by men and women, and wide buccal corridors are less attractive.

摘要

目的

通过短面型、中面型和长面型个体,评估微笑在不同面部类型中关于颊间隙的美学感知和吸引力。

材料与方法

将一名中面型面部的微笑个体图像进行修改,以创建具有五种不同颊间隙(2%、10%、15%、22%和28%)的三种不同面部类型。为实现此效果,使用了一款照片编辑软件(Adobe Photoshop,Adobe Systems Inc,旧金山,加利福尼亚州,美国)。将图像提交给短面型、中面型和长面型面部的评估者,他们通过一个70毫米的视觉模拟量表评估美学感知程度和吸引力。评估者之间的差异通过曼 - 惠特尼检验进行验证。所有统计分析的置信水平为95%。

结果

短面型个体认为颊间隙为2%的中面型和长面型面部更具吸引力。中面型个体认为颊间隙为2%、10%和15%的中面型和长面型面部更具吸引力。长面型个体认为颊间隙为2%的中面型面部更具吸引力。女性评估者通常比男性评估者给出更高的分数。

结论

为获得更美观的笑容,有必要观察患者的面部类型。对窄颊间隙的偏好是男性和女性都偏爱的美学特征,而宽颊间隙则吸引力较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13a/4245749/8855236748e7/jaos-22-05-0382-g01.jpg

相似文献

2
Smile attractiveness related to buccal corridor space in 3 different facial types: A perception of 3 ethnic groups of Malaysians.
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Aug;120(2):252-256. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.021. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
3
Perceptions of orthodontists, laypersons, and patients regarding buccal corridors and facial types.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Jan;161(1):92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.06.051. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
4
The Influence of the Smile on the Perceived Facial Type Esthetics.
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jul 9;2018:3562916. doi: 10.1155/2018/3562916. eCollection 2018.
5
Buccal corridors and smile esthetics.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Feb;127(2):208-13; quiz 261. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.11.027.
6
Smile attractiveness perception regarding buccal corridor size among different facial types.
Dent Med Probl. 2018 Jul-Sep;55(3):305-312. doi: 10.17219/dmp/92634.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Midline Deviation and Crown Width Disproportion on Perception of Smile Esthetics.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Sep;37(9):2116-2124. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13492. Epub 2025 May 23.
2
The impact of dentofacial characteristics and malocclusions on dissatisfaction with dentofacial appearance.
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Nov 28;28(12):661. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06060-z.
4
Perception of Dental Students and Laypersons to Altered Dentofacial Aesthetics.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019 Nov 11;10(1):85-95. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_340_19. eCollection 2020 Jan-Feb.
5
The Influence of the Smile on the Perceived Facial Type Esthetics.
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jul 9;2018:3562916. doi: 10.1155/2018/3562916. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

2
Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of profile esthetics between white and black evaluators.
Angle Orthod. 2014 Mar;84(2):231-8. doi: 10.2319/051513-373.1. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
3
Evaluation of the susceptibility to pigmentation of orthodontic esthetic elastomeric ligatures.
Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 Mar 15;18(2):20.e1-8. doi: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000200008.
4
Esthetic perception of black spaces between maxillary central incisors by different age groups.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Mar;143(3):371-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.10.020.
5
Perception of the esthetic impact of gingival smile on laypersons, dental professionals, and dental students.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Apr;115(4):448-54. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.04.027. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
7
Perceptions of Jordanian laypersons and dental professionals to altered smile aesthetics.
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Aug;33(4):450-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq100. Epub 2010 Nov 1.
10
Effects of buccal corridors on smile esthetics in Japanese.
Angle Orthod. 2009 Jul;79(4):628-33. doi: 10.2319/080708-410.1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验