Suppr超能文献

柬埔寨的外科部位感染出院后监测主动前瞻性监测研究。

Active prospective surveillance study with post-discharge surveillance of surgical site infections in Cambodia.

机构信息

Preah Kossamak Hospital, 271 Sangkat Teuk Loak II Street, Khan Tuol Kok, Phnom Penh City, Cambodia.

Prupet NGO, Centre Hospitalier Moulins, 10, Avenue Général de Gaulle, 03006 Moulins Cedex, France.

出版信息

J Infect Public Health. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):298-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Nov 10.

Abstract

Barriers to the implementation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance have been described in resource-limited settings. This study aimed to estimate the SSI incidence rate in a Cambodian hospital and to compare different modalities of SSI surveillance. We performed an active prospective study with post-discharge surveillance. During the hospital stay, trained surveyors collected the CDC criteria to identify SSI by direct examination of the surgical site. After discharge, a card was given to each included patient to be presented to all practitioners examining the surgical site. Among 167 patients, direct examination of the surgical site identified a cumulative incidence rate of 14 infections per 100 patients. An independent review of medical charts presented a sensitivity of 16%. The sensitivity of the purulent drainage criterion to detect SSIs was 83%. After hospital discharge, 87% of the patients provided follow-up data, and nine purulent drainages were reported by a practitioner (cumulative incidence rate: 20%). Overall, the incidence rate was dependent on the surveillance modalities. The review of medical charts to identify SSIs during hospitalization was not effective; the use of a follow-up card with phone calls for post-discharge surveillance was effective.

摘要

在资源有限的环境中,已经描述了实施疾病预防控制中心(CDC)手术部位感染(SSI)监测指南的障碍。本研究旨在估计柬埔寨一家医院的 SSI 发生率,并比较不同的 SSI 监测方式。我们进行了一项主动前瞻性研究,采用出院后监测。在住院期间,受过培训的调查员收集了 CDC 标准,通过直接检查手术部位来确定 SSI。出院后,为每位纳入的患者发放一张卡片,以便所有检查手术部位的医生使用。在 167 名患者中,直接检查手术部位发现 100 名患者中有 14 例感染的累积发生率。对病历的独立审查显示敏感性为 16%。脓性引流的标准对 SSI 的敏感性为 83%。出院后,87%的患者提供了随访数据,有一名医生报告了 9 例脓性引流(累积发生率:20%)。总体而言,发生率取决于监测方式。住院期间通过审查病历来识别 SSI 的方法效果不佳;使用带有出院后随访电话的随访卡进行监测是有效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验