Sun Ren X, Chong Lauren C, Simmons Trent T, Houlahan Kathleen E, Prokopec Stephenie D, Watson John D, Moffat Ivy D, Lensu Sanna, Lindén Jere, P'ng Christine, Okey Allan B, Pohjanvirta Raimo, Boutros Paul C
Informatics and Bio-computing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada.
BMC Genomics. 2014 Dec 3;15(1):1053. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1053.
Research on the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) has largely focused on variations in toxic outcomes resulting from its activation by halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons. But the AHR also plays key roles in regulating pathways critical for development, and after decades of research the mechanisms underlying physiological regulation by the AHR remain poorly characterized. Previous studies identified several core genes that respond to xenobiotic AHR ligands across a broad range of species and tissues. However, only limited inferences have been made regarding its role in regulating constitutive gene activity, i.e. in the absence of exogenous ligands. To address this, we profiled transcriptomic variations between AHR-active and AHR-less-active animals in the absence of an exogenous agonist across five tissues, three of which came from rats (hypothalamus, white adipose and liver) and two of which came from mice (kidney and liver). Because AHR status alone has been shown sufficient to alter transcriptomic responses, we reason that by contrasting profiles amongst AHR-variant animals, we may elucidate effects of the AHR on constitutive mRNA abundances.
We found significantly more overlap in constitutive mRNA abundances amongst tissues within the same species than from tissues between species and identified 13 genes (Agt, Car3, Creg1, Ctsc, E2f6, Enpp1, Gatm, Gstm4, Kcnj8, Me1, Pdk1, Slc35a3, and Sqrdl) that are affected by AHR-status in four of five tissues. One gene, Creg1, was significantly up-regulated in all AHR-less-active animals. We also find greater overlap between tissues at the pathway level than at the gene level, suggesting coherency to the AHR signalling response within these processes. Analysis of regulatory motifs suggests that the AHR mostly mediates transcriptional regulation via direct binding to response elements.
These findings, though preliminary, present a platform for further evaluating the role of the AHR in regulation of constitutive mRNA levels and physiologic function.
芳烃受体(AHR)的研究主要集中在卤代芳烃激活该受体所导致的毒性结果变化上。但AHR在调节对发育至关重要的信号通路中也起着关键作用,经过数十年的研究,AHR进行生理调节的潜在机制仍未得到充分阐明。以往的研究在广泛的物种和组织中鉴定出了几个对异源生物AHR配体有反应的核心基因。然而,关于其在调节组成型基因活性(即在没有外源性配体的情况下)中的作用,仅得出了有限的推论。为了解决这个问题,我们分析了在没有外源性激动剂的情况下,AHR活性高和AHR活性低的动物在五个组织中的转录组变化,其中三个组织来自大鼠(下丘脑、白色脂肪和肝脏),两个组织来自小鼠(肾脏和肝脏)。由于仅AHR状态已被证明足以改变转录组反应,我们推断通过对比AHR变异动物之间的图谱,我们可以阐明AHR对组成型mRNA丰度的影响。
我们发现同一物种内组织间组成型mRNA丰度的重叠明显多于不同物种间组织的重叠,并鉴定出13个基因(Agt、Car3、Creg1、Ctsc、E2f6、Enpp1、Gatm、Gstm4、Kcnj8、Me1、Pdk1、Slc35a3和Sqrdl)在五个组织中的四个中受AHR状态影响。一个基因Creg1在所有AHR活性低的动物中显著上调。我们还发现在通路水平上组织间的重叠比在基因水平上更大,这表明这些过程中AHR信号反应具有一致性。对调控基序的分析表明,AHR主要通过直接结合反应元件来介导转录调控。
这些发现虽然是初步的,但为进一步评估AHR在调节组成型mRNA水平和生理功能中的作用提供了一个平台。