Jiménez-Pérez Miguel, González-Grande Rocío, Rando-Muñoz Francisco Javier
Miguel Jiménez-Pérez, Rocío González-Grande, Liver transplantation and hepatology unit, UGC de Aparato Digestivo Hospital Regional Universitario, 29010 Málaga, Spain.
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 28;20(44):16409-17. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16409.
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the leading cause of death from liver disease and the leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) in the United States and Western Europe. LT represents the best therapeutic alternative for patients with advanced chronic liver disease caused by HCV or those who develop hepatocarcinoma. Reinfection by HCV of the graft is universal and occurs in 95% of transplant patients. This reinfection can compromise graft function and patient survival. In a few cases, the histological recurrence is minimal and non-progressive; however, in most patients it follows a more rapid course than in immunocompetent persons, and frequently evolves into cirrhosis with graft loss. In fact, the five-year and ten-year survival of patients transplanted because of HCV are 75% and 68%, respectively, compared with 85% and 78% in patients transplanted for other reasons. There is also a pattern of recurrence that is very severe, but rare (< 10%), called fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, which often involves rapid graft loss. Patients who present a negative HCV viremia after antiviral treatment have better survival. Many studies published over recent years have shown that antiviral treatment of post-transplant HCV hepatitis carried out during the late phase is the best option for improving the prognosis of these patients. Until 2011, PEGylated interferon plus ribavirin was the standard of care, resulting in a sustained virological response in around 30% of recipients. The addition of protease inhibitors, such as boceprevir or telaprevir, to the standard of care, or the use of other direct-acting antiviral drugs may involve therapeutic changes in the context of HCV recurrence. This may result a better prognosis for these patients, particularly those with severe recurrence or factors predicting rapid progression of fibrosis. However, the use of these agents in LT still requires clarification in terms of safety and efficacy.
慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染是美国和西欧肝病致死的主要原因,也是肝移植(LT)的主要指征。肝移植是由HCV引起的晚期慢性肝病患者或发生肝癌患者的最佳治疗选择。移植肝被HCV再次感染很常见,95%的移植患者会出现这种情况。这种再次感染会损害移植肝功能和患者生存率。在少数情况下,组织学复发轻微且无进展;然而,在大多数患者中,其病程比免疫功能正常者更快,且常发展为肝硬化并导致移植肝失功。事实上,因HCV接受移植患者的五年和十年生存率分别为75%和68%,而因其他原因接受移植患者的这一比例分别为85%和78%。还有一种非常严重但罕见(<10%)的复发模式,称为纤维淤胆型肝炎,常导致移植肝迅速失功。抗病毒治疗后HCV病毒血症呈阴性的患者生存率更高。近年来发表的许多研究表明,在晚期对抗移植后HCV肝炎进行抗病毒治疗是改善这些患者预后的最佳选择。直到2011年,聚乙二醇化干扰素联合利巴韦林是标准治疗方案,约30%的受者可实现持续病毒学应答。在标准治疗方案中加入蛋白酶抑制剂,如博赛匹韦或特拉匹韦,或使用其他直接抗病毒药物,可能会在HCV复发的情况下带来治疗改变。这可能会改善这些患者的预后,尤其是那些复发严重或有预测纤维化快速进展因素的患者。然而,这些药物在肝移植中的使用在安全性和有效性方面仍需进一步明确。