Bowen Judith L, Hirsh David, Aagaard Eva, Kaminetzky Catherine P, Smith Marie, Hardman Joseph, Chheda Shobhina G
J.L. Bowen is professor of medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, and physician education consultant, Office of Academic Affiliations, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC. D. Hirsh is associate professor of medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, and staff physician, Department of Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, Massachusetts. E. Aagaard is professor of medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado. C.P. Kaminetzky is associate chief of staff for education, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, and assistant professor, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington. M. Smith is Henry A. Palmer Endowed Professor, Community Pharmacy Practice, and assistant dean, Practice and Public Policy Partnerships, University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, Connecticut. J. Hardman is assistant professor of medicine, associate program director, and medical director, Internal Medicine Resident Practice, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. S.G. Chheda is associate professor of medicine and pediatrics, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Acad Med. 2015 May;90(5):587-93. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000589.
Continuity of care is a core value of patients and primary care physicians, yet in graduate medical education (GME), creating effective clinical teaching environments that emphasize continuity poses challenges. In this Perspective, the authors review three dimensions of continuity for patient care-informational, longitudinal, and interpersonal-and propose analogous dimensions describing continuity for learning that address both residents learning from patient care and supervisors and interprofessional team members supporting residents' competency development. The authors review primary care GME reform efforts through the lens of continuity, including the growing body of evidence that highlights the importance of longitudinal continuity between learners and supervisors for making competency judgments. The authors consider the challenges that primary care residency programs face in the wake of practice transformation to patient-centered medical home models and make recommendations to maximize the opportunity that these practice models provide. First, educators, researchers, and policy makers must be more precise with terms describing various dimensions of continuity. Second, research should prioritize developing assessments that enable the study of the impact of interpersonal continuity on clinical outcomes for patients and learning outcomes for residents. Third, residency programs should establish program structures that provide informational and longitudinal continuity to enable the development of interpersonal continuity for care and learning. Fourth, these educational models and continuity assessments should extend to the level of the interprofessional team. Fifth, policy leaders should develop a meaningful recognition process that rewards academic practices for training the primary care workforce.
医疗连续性是患者和初级保健医生的核心价值观,但在毕业后医学教育(GME)中,创建强调连续性的有效临床教学环境面临挑战。在本观点文章中,作者回顾了患者护理连续性的三个维度——信息性、纵向性和人际性,并提出了描述学习连续性的类似维度,这些维度既涉及住院医师从患者护理中学习,也涉及支持住院医师能力发展的上级医师和跨专业团队成员。作者从连续性的角度回顾了初级保健毕业后医学教育改革的努力,包括越来越多的证据表明,学习者与上级医师之间的纵向连续性对于做出能力判断至关重要。作者考虑了初级保健住院医师培训项目在向以患者为中心的医疗之家模式转变后所面临的挑战,并提出了建议,以最大限度地利用这些实践模式提供的机会。首先,教育工作者、研究人员和政策制定者必须更精确地使用描述连续性各个维度的术语。其次,研究应优先开发评估方法,以便能够研究人际连续性对患者临床结果和住院医师学习结果的影响。第三,住院医师培训项目应建立能够提供信息性和纵向连续性的项目结构,以促进护理和学习方面人际连续性的发展。第四,这些教育模式和连续性评估应扩展到跨专业团队层面。第五,政策领导人应制定一个有意义的认可程序,奖励培养初级保健劳动力的学术实践。