Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell.
Medical Student, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell.
MedEdPORTAL. 2020 Oct 7;16:10974. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10974.
As more practices move to patient-centered medical home (PCMH) models, future health care professionals must train to work in collaborative settings. We implemented a 3-hour workshop for multidisciplinary trainees on the PCMH principles of access and continuity based on the EFECT framework (eliciting a patient-centered narrative, facilitating an interprofessional team discussion, evaluating the clinical evidence, creating a shared care plan, and tracking outcomes).
Participants included internal medicine residents and medical, physician assistant (PA), and clinical psychology students. The workshop incorporated reflective activities identifying patient and provider health care delivery priorities, plus a PCMH presentation and group activities focusing on access and continuity. Evaluations were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively.
The workshop had 39 participants (seven physicians, one PA, one educator, one psychologist, three staff, nine residents, one PA student, one psychology extern, and 15 medical students). On a 0-10 Likert scale (0 = 10 = ), learners reported higher knowledge of PCMH principles ( = 8.8), feeling better prepared for PCMH work ( = 8.6), and having obtained real-world skills ( = 8.3). Open-ended responses describing the workshop's take-home message included the role of patient-centeredness in clinical redesign, the value of the multidisciplinary team in optimizing access and continuity, and how to use a quality improvement approach for access and continuity.
This workshop increased PCMH-related knowledge and encouraged discussion of professional roles within the team. Learners recognized the benefits of team-based rather than provider-centric approaches to access and continuity.
随着越来越多的实践向以患者为中心的医疗之家 (PCMH) 模式转变,未来的医疗保健专业人员必须接受培训,以便在协作环境中工作。我们根据 EFECT 框架(引出以患者为中心的叙述、促进跨专业团队讨论、评估临床证据、创建共享护理计划和跟踪结果)为多学科受训人员实施了一个关于 PCMH 准入和连续性原则的 3 小时研讨会。
参与者包括内科住院医师和医学、医师助理 (PA) 和临床心理学学生。该研讨会包括识别患者和提供者医疗保健提供优先级的反思活动,以及 PCMH 演示和侧重于准入和连续性的小组活动。评估结果进行了定性和定量分析。
该研讨会有 39 名参与者(7 名医生、1 名 PA、1 名教育工作者、1 名心理学家、3 名工作人员、9 名住院医师、1 名 PA 学生、1 名心理学实习生和 15 名医学生)。在 0-10 级李克特量表(0 = 10 = )上,学习者报告说对 PCMH 原则的了解有所提高( = 8.8),对 PCMH 工作的准备感觉更好( = 8.6),并获得了实际技能( = 8.3)。描述研讨会要点的开放式回复包括以患者为中心在临床重新设计中的作用、多学科团队在优化准入和连续性方面的价值,以及如何使用质量改进方法来实现准入和连续性。
该研讨会增加了与 PCMH 相关的知识,并鼓励讨论团队中的专业角色。学习者认识到以团队为基础而不是以提供者为中心的方法来实现准入和连续性的好处。