Strier Karen B, Lee Phyllis C, Ives Anthony R
Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, United States of America.
Behaviour and Evolution Research Group, Psychology, School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 3;9(12):e114099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114099. eCollection 2014.
Comparative approaches to the evolution of primate social behavior have typically involved two distinct lines of inquiry. One has focused on phylogenetic analyses that treat social traits as static, species-specific characteristics; the other has focused on understanding the behavioral flexibility of particular populations or species in response to local ecological or demographic variables. Here, we combine these approaches by distinguishing between constraining traits such as dispersal regimes (male, female, or bi-sexual), which are relatively invariant, and responding traits such as grouping patterns (stable, fission-fusion, sometimes fission-fusion), which can reflect rapid adjustments to current conditions. Using long-term and cross-sectional data from 29 studies of 22 species of wild primates, we confirm that dispersal regime exhibits a strong phylogenetic signal in our sample. We then show that primate species with high variation in group size and adult sex ratios exhibit variability in grouping pattern (i.e., sometimes fission-fusion) with dispersal regime constraining the grouping response. When assessing demographic variation, we found a strong positive relationship between the variability in group size over time and the number of observation years, which further illustrates the importance of long-term demographic data to interpretations of social behavior. Our approach complements other comparative efforts to understand the role of behavioral flexibility by distinguishing between constraining and responding traits, and incorporating these distinctions into analyses of social states over evolutionary and ecological time.
对灵长类动物社会行为进化的比较研究方法通常涉及两条不同的探究路线。一条专注于系统发育分析,即将社会特征视为静态的、物种特异性的特征;另一条则专注于理解特定种群或物种对当地生态或人口统计学变量的行为灵活性。在这里,我们通过区分相对不变的限制性状(如扩散模式,包括雄性、雌性或双性扩散)和响应性状(如群居模式,包括稳定型、裂变融合型、有时为裂变融合型)来结合这些方法,响应性状可以反映对当前条件的快速调整。利用来自对22种野生灵长类动物的29项研究的长期和横断面数据,我们证实扩散模式在我们的样本中表现出强烈的系统发育信号。然后我们表明,群体大小和成年性别比变化较大的灵长类物种在群居模式上表现出变异性(即有时为裂变融合型),而扩散模式则限制了群居反应。在评估人口统计学变异时,我们发现群体大小随时间的变异性与观察年份数之间存在很强的正相关关系,这进一步说明了长期人口统计学数据对社会行为解释的重要性。我们的方法通过区分限制性状和响应性状,并将这些区分纳入进化和生态时间尺度上的社会状态分析中,补充了其他旨在理解行为灵活性作用的比较研究。