Suppr超能文献

机械通气困难撤机辅助治疗的研究

[Investigation of adjuvant treatment for difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation].

作者信息

Jia Lijing, Li Hongliang, Bai Yu, Zhu Xi

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China, Corresponding author: Zhu Xi, Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Dec;26(12):849-54. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.12.001.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the value of drug intervention for difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

A prospective single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted. 120 patients with difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation encountered in Department of Critical Care Medicine of Peking University Third Hospital from January 2008 to December 2013 were included, and the patients were divided into treatment group and control group according to random number table, with 60 cases in each group. Patients received furosemide therapy in the treatment group 3 days before weaning up to 48 hours after weaning in order to control negative liquid balance. Enema was given the day before weaning to reduce abdominal pressure. On the weaning day, all of the patients received nitroglycerin and beta blocker or cedilanid to prevent or control elevation of blood pressure and heart rate in the process of weaning. All patients in treatment group received anisodamine in small dosage 2 hours before extubation. The patients in control group received conventional treatment without drug intervention. Baseline indexes of two groups were compared, including the heart rate, respiration rate (RR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse blood oxygen saturation (SpO₂), blood gas, hemoglobin (HG), albumin (ALB) and creatinine (Cr). The main reasons of difficulty in weaning, sedative and analgesic drug selection, presence of abdominal discomfort before weaning, interval between sputum suction before extubation, liquid balance at the beginning of the investigation and at time of weaning, 24 hours and 48 hours after weaning, failures of spontaneous breathing test (SBT), length of mechanical ventilation,length of ICU stay, and total length of mechanical ventilation and total length of ICU stay during hospitalization.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the heart rate, RR, MAP, SpO₂, blood gas, HG, ALB, Cr at the beginning of the investigation between the two groups. The main reasons for difficult weaning in both groups of patients were respiratory dysfunction, cardiac insufficiency, and central nervous system dysfunction. The use of propofol combined dexmedetomidine in the treatment group was more frequent than the control group [16.7% (10/60)vs. 1.7% (1/60), χ² = 8.107, P=0.004], and there was no statistically significant difference in the use of other combinations of sedative drugs between the two groups. Abdominal discomfort before weaning was milder in treatment group as compared with control group [10.0% (6/60) vs. 25.0% (15/60), χ² = 4.675, P=0.031]. The interval between sputum suction before extubation in the treatment group was significantly longer than that of the control group [hours: 1 (1, 2) vs. 1 (1, 1), Z=-2.209, P= 0.027]. SBT failure was less frequent in treatment group compared with control group [times: 0 (0, 1) vs. 1 (1, 2), Z=-6.561, P=0.000]. Liquid balance was better in the treatment group than the control group at time of weaning, 24 hours and 48 hours after weaning [at time of weaning: -567.71(-755.95,-226.41) vs. 1 256.76 (472.48, 1 796.63), Z=-9.038, P=0.000; 24 hours after weaning: -5.03 (-530.28, 245.09) vs. 342.28 (125.36, 613.25), Z=-4.711, P=0.000; 48 hours after weaning: 115.50 (-450.26,485.00) vs. 330.00 (16.25,575.25), Z=-1.932, P=0.053]. Compared with control group, length of mechanical ventilation [days: 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) vs. 2.0 (2.0, 3.0), Z=-6.545, P=0.000], ICU stay time [days: 3.0 (3.0, 4.0) vs. 4.0 (4.0, 5.0), Z=-6.545, P=0.000], and total length of mechanical ventilation [days: 8.0 (6.0,12.0) vs. 11.0 (8.0, 15.0), Z=-4.091, P=0.000] and total length of ICU stay during hospitalization [days: 12.5 (9.2, 19.0) vs. 17.0 (12.0, 29.5), Z=-2.722, P=0.000] were all significantly shorter in the treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant drugs therapy is helpful in patients weaning from the mechanical ventilation, and can shorten length of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay time. Propofol, combined dexmedetomidine, is helpful for weaning.

摘要

目的

探讨药物干预在机械通气困难撤机中的价值。

方法

进行一项前瞻性单盲随机对照试验。纳入2008年1月至2013年12月北京大学第三医院重症医学科收治的120例机械通气困难撤机患者,根据随机数字表将患者分为治疗组和对照组,每组60例。治疗组在撤机前3天至撤机后48小时给予呋塞米治疗以控制负液体平衡。撤机前一天给予灌肠以降低腹压。撤机日,所有患者均接受硝酸甘油和β受体阻滞剂或西地兰以预防或控制撤机过程中血压和心率升高。治疗组所有患者在拔管前2小时给予小剂量山莨菪碱。对照组接受常规治疗,不进行药物干预。比较两组的基线指标,包括心率、呼吸频率(RR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO₂)、血气、血红蛋白(HG)、白蛋白(ALB)和肌酐(Cr)。比较两组撤机困难的主要原因、镇静和镇痛药物选择、撤机前腹部不适情况、拔管前吸痰间隔时间、研究开始时及撤机时、撤机后24小时和48小时的液体平衡情况、自主呼吸试验(SBT)失败情况、机械通气时间、ICU住院时间以及住院期间机械通气总时间和ICU住院总时间。

结果

两组研究开始时的心率、RR、MAP、SpO₂、血气、HG、ALB、Cr差异无统计学意义。两组患者撤机困难的主要原因均为呼吸功能障碍、心功能不全和中枢神经系统功能障碍。治疗组丙泊酚联合右美托咪定的使用频率高于对照组[16.7%(10/60)对1.7%(1/60),χ² = 8.107,P = 0.004],两组其他镇静药物联合使用情况差异无统计学意义。治疗组撤机前腹部不适较对照组轻[10.0%(6/60)对25.0%(15/60),χ² = 4.675,P = 0.031]。治疗组拔管前吸痰间隔时间明显长于对照组[小时:1(1,2)对1(1,1),Z = -2.209,P = 0.027]。治疗组SBT失败次数少于对照组[次数:0(0,1)对1(1,2),Z = -6.561,P = 0.000]。撤机时、撤机后24小时和48小时治疗组的液体平衡情况优于对照组[撤机时:-567.71(-755.95,-226.41)对1256.76(472.48,1796.63),Z = -9.038,P = 0.000;撤机后24小时:-5.03(-530.28,245.09)对342.28(125.36,613.25),Z = -4.711,P = 0.000;撤机后48小时:115.50(-450.26,485.00)对330.00(16.25,575.25),Z = -1.932,P = 0.053]。与对照组相比,治疗组的机械通气时间[天:1.0(1.0,2.0)对2.0(2.0,3.),Z = -6.545,P = 0.000]、ICU住院时间[天:3.0(3.0,4.0)对4.0(4.0,5.0),Z = -6.545,P = 0.000]、机械通气总时间[天:8.0(6.0,12.0)对11.0(8.0,15.0),Z = -4.091,P = 0.000]以及住院期间ICU住院总时间[天:12.5(9.2,19.0)对17.0(12.0,29.5),Z = -2.722,P = 0.000]均明显缩短。

结论

辅助药物治疗有助于机械通气患者撤机,并可缩短机械通气时间和ICU住院时间。丙泊酚联合右美托咪定有助于撤机。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验