• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助及电视辅助胸腔镜肺段切除术治疗恶性和良性病变

Robotic and video-assisted thoracic surgery lung segmentectomy for malignant and benign lesions.

作者信息

Demir Adalet, Ayalp Kemal, Ozkan Berker, Kaba Erkan, Toker Alper

机构信息

Thoracic Surgery Department, Istanbul University, Istanbul School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

Thoracic Surgery Department, Group Florence Nightingale Istanbul Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Mar;20(3):304-9. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu399. Epub 2014 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivu399
PMID:25476458
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The experience with robotic techniques (RATS) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in pulmonary segmentectomy is still limited. We evaluated our prospectively recorded database to compare two different minimally invasive techniques.

METHODS

Between May 2007 and July 2014, a total of 99 patients underwent RATS (n = 34) and VATS (n = 65) pulmonary segmentectomies at two institutions. The median age of patients was 59 ± 15 (16-84) years, and 61% were male. Seventy-six patients were operated on for malignancy and 23 for benign diseases.

RESULTS

The major morbidity and mortality rates were 24-23% and 0-1.5% for RATS and VATS (P = 0.57) and (P = 0.66), respectively. The mean console time for RATS was longer than the mean operation time for VATS [76 ± 23 (40-150) vs 65 ± 22 (30-120) min (P = 0.018)]. The mean duration of drainage was similar for RATS and VATS [3.53 ± 2.3 (1-10) days vs 3.98 ± 3.6 (1-21) (P = 0.90)], respectively. The duration of postoperative stay for RATS was 4.65 ± 1.94 (2-10) days and for VATS was 6.16 ± 4.7 (2-24) days (P = 0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Both RATS and VATS pulmonary segmentectomy operations are performed with similar morbidity and mortality rates. Although the duration of operation is longer in RATS when compared with an established VATS programme, there is a tendency towards a shorter postoperative stay.

摘要

目的

机器人技术(RATS)和电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)在肺段切除术中的应用经验仍然有限。我们评估了前瞻性记录的数据库,以比较两种不同的微创技术。

方法

2007年5月至2014年7月期间,共有99例患者在两家机构接受了RATS(n = 34)和VATS(n = 65)肺段切除术。患者的中位年龄为59±15(16 - 84)岁,61%为男性。76例患者因恶性肿瘤接受手术,23例因良性疾病接受手术。

结果

RATS和VATS的主要发病率和死亡率分别为24 - 23%和0 - 1.5%(P = 0.57)和(P = 0.66)。RATS的平均控制台时间比VATS的平均手术时间长[76±23(40 - 150)分钟对65±22(30 - 120)分钟(P = 0.018)]。RATS和VATS的平均引流持续时间相似[3.53±2.3(1 - 10)天对3.98±3.6(1 - 21)天(P = 0.90)]。RATS的术后住院时间为4.65±1.94(2 - 10)天,VATS为6.16±4.7(2 - 24)天(P = 0.39)。

结论

RATS和VATS肺段切除术的发病率和死亡率相似。尽管与成熟的VATS方案相比,RATS的手术时间较长,但术后住院时间有缩短的趋势。

相似文献

1
Robotic and video-assisted thoracic surgery lung segmentectomy for malignant and benign lesions.机器人辅助及电视辅助胸腔镜肺段切除术治疗恶性和良性病变
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Mar;20(3):304-9. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu399. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
2
Early experience with robotic lung resection results in similar operative outcomes and morbidity when compared with matched video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases.与匹配的电视辅助胸腔镜手术病例相比,机器人肺切除术的早期经验显示出相似的手术结果和发病率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 May;93(5):1598-604; discussion 1604-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.067. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
3
Experience of segmentectomy from 36 Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer at stage I.36 例Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌患者行解剖性肺段切除术的经验。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2013 Jul;126(14):2687-93.
4
Transitioning from video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy to robotics for lung cancer: are there outcomes advantages?从电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术到机器人手术治疗肺癌:是否有结果优势?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):724-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
5
Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database.开胸、电视辅助胸腔镜手术和机器人辅助肺叶切除术:国家数据库回顾。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jan;97(1):236-42; discussion 242-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.117. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
6
Comparing robotic lung resection with thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases entered into the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database.将机器人肺切除术与开胸手术及电视辅助胸腔镜手术进行比较,病例数据来自胸外科医师协会数据库。
Innovations (Phila). 2014 Jan-Feb;9(1):10-5. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000043.
7
Comparative intention-to-treat analysis of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery approach to pulmonary segmentectomy for lung carcinoma‡.电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗肺癌肺段切除术的比较意向性分析‡
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Sep;21(3):276-83. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv143. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
8
Short-term outcomes of typical versus atypical lung segmentectomy by minimally invasive surgeries.微创手术中典型与非典型肺段切除术的短期疗效。
Thorac Cancer. 2019 Sep;10(9):1812-1818. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13152. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
9
The affordability of minimally invasive procedures in major lung resection: a prospective study.主要肺切除术中微创手术的可负担性:一项前瞻性研究。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Sep 1;25(3):469-475. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx149.
10
Single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery in 1063 cases: a single-institution experience†.1063例单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术:单机构经验†
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jan;49 Suppl 1:i31-6. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv408.

引用本文的文献

1
A Precision Surgery Framework for Lung Resection: Robotic, Video-Assisted, and Open Segmentectomy.一种用于肺切除的精准手术框架:机器人辅助、电视辅助和开放肺段切除术。
J Pers Med. 2025 Aug 19;15(8):387. doi: 10.3390/jpm15080387.
2
Adoption of the Robotic Platform across Thoracic Surgeries.机器人平台在胸外科手术中的应用。
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 27;13(19):5764. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195764.
3
Open thoracotomy versus VATS versus RATS for segmentectomy: a systematic review & Bayesian network meta-analysis.开胸手术与电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)与机器人辅助胸腔镜手术(RATS)用于肺段切除术的比较:一项系统评价与贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Oct 1;19(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03015-z.
4
The Surgical Renaissance: Advancements in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Their Impact on Patient Outcomes.外科复兴:电视辅助胸腔镜手术和机器人辅助胸外科手术的进展及其对患者预后的影响。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 5;16(17):3086. doi: 10.3390/cancers16173086.
5
Long-term outcomes of robotic versus video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reconstructed patient data.机器人辅助与电视辅助肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌的长期结局:对重建患者数据的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Oct 31;15(10):5700-5713. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-582. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
6
A comparative study of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and conventional approaches for short-term outcomes of anatomical segmentectomy.机器人辅助胸腔镜手术与传统手术治疗解剖性肺段切除术短期疗效的比较研究
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 May;72(5):338-345. doi: 10.1007/s11748-023-01983-y. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
7
Robotic versus Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Lung Cancer: Short-Term Outcomes of a Propensity Matched Analysis.机器人辅助与电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗肺癌:倾向评分匹配分析的短期结果
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 21;15(8):2391. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082391.
8
Defining the learning curve of robotic portal segmentectomy in small pulmonary lesions: a prospective observational study.定义机器人肺段切除术在小肺病变中的学习曲线:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01545-7. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
9
Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Robot-Assisted and Video-Assisted Segmentectomy for Small Pulmonary Nodules: A Propensity Score-Matching Study.机器人辅助与电视辅助下小肺结节肺段切除术短期疗效比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 May;30(5):2757-2764. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13179-y. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
10
Approaches and outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) for lung cancer: a narrative review.机器人辅助胸腔镜手术(RATS)治疗肺癌的方法和结果:叙述性综述。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):797-809. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01512-8. Epub 2022 Dec 21.