Shahvarpour Ali, Shirazi-Adl Aboulfazl, Larivière Christian, Bazrgari Babak
Division of Applied Mechanics, Department of Mechanical Engineering, École Polytechnique, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Division of Applied Mechanics, Department of Mechanical Engineering, École Polytechnique, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Biomech. 2015 Jan 2;48(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
Understanding the central nervous system (CNS) response strategy to trunk perturbations could help in prevention of back injuries and development of rehabilitation and treatment programs. This study aimed to investigate biomechanical response of the trunk musculoskeletal system under sudden forward loads, accounting for pre-perturbation conditions (preloading, initial posture and abdominal antagonistic coactivation) and perturbation magnitudes. Using a trunk kinematics-driven iterative finite element (FE) model, temporal profiles of measured kinematics and external load along with subjects' weights were prescribed to predict thoracolumbar muscle forces/latencies and spinal loads for twelve healthy subjects when tested in six conditions during pre- and post-perturbation periods. Results demonstrated that preloading the trunk significantly (i.e., p<0.05) increased pre-perturbation back muscle forces but significantly decreased post-perturbation peak muscle active forces and muscle latencies. Initial trunk flexion significantly increased muscle active and passive forces before the perturbation and their peak values after the perturbation, which in turn caused much larger spinal loads. Abdominal muscles antagonistic pre-activation did not alter the internal variables investigated in this study. Increase in sudden applied load increased muscle reflex activities and spinal forces; a 50 N increase in sudden load (i.e., when comparing 50 N to 100 N) increased the L5-S1 compression force by 1327 N under 5 N preload and by 1374 N under 50 N preload. Overall, forces on the spine and hence risk of failure substantially increased in sudden forward loading when the magnitude of sudden load increased and when the trunk was initially in a flexed posture. In contrast, a higher initial preload diminished reflex latencies and compression forces.
了解中枢神经系统(CNS)对躯干扰动的反应策略有助于预防背部损伤以及制定康复和治疗方案。本研究旨在调查躯干肌肉骨骼系统在突然向前加载时的生物力学反应,同时考虑扰动前的条件(预加载、初始姿势和腹部拮抗肌共同激活)以及扰动幅度。使用一个由躯干运动学驱动的迭代有限元(FE)模型,规定了测量的运动学和外部载荷的时间曲线以及受试者的体重,以预测12名健康受试者在扰动前后六个条件下测试时的胸腰段肌肉力量/潜伏期和脊柱载荷。结果表明,对躯干进行预加载显著(即p<0.05)增加了扰动前的背部肌肉力量,但显著降低了扰动后的肌肉峰值主动力量和肌肉潜伏期。初始躯干屈曲显著增加了扰动前的肌肉主动和被动力以及扰动后的峰值,这反过来又导致了更大的脊柱载荷。腹部肌肉的拮抗预激活并未改变本研究中所研究的内部变量。突然施加的载荷增加会增加肌肉反射活动和脊柱力量;突然载荷增加50 N(即比较50 N和100 N时),在5 N预加载下L5 - S1压缩力增加1327 N,在50 N预加载下增加1374 N。总体而言,当突然载荷幅度增加且躯干最初处于屈曲姿势时,突然向前加载时脊柱上的力以及因此的失效风险会大幅增加。相比之下,较高的初始预加载会减少反射潜伏期和压缩力。