Muller Sven, Falch Claudius, Axt Steffen, Wilhelm Peter, Hein Dirk, Königsrainer Alfred, Kirschniak Andreas
Working Group for Surgical Technology and Training, Clinic for Visceral, General and Transplant Surgery, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Emerg Med J. 2015 Sep;32(9):698-702. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203349. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
Hyperbilirubinaemia is reported to be a positive predictor in diagnosing appendicitis and especially appendiceal perforation. We, therefore, analysed the diagnostic accuracy of serum bilirubin in anticipating appendicitis and its severity.
All consecutive patients undergoing appendectomy for suspected appendicitis from May 2009 to August 2011 were analysed. Patients were classified based on final histopathological findings into the groups: no appendiceal inflammation, non-perforated appendicitis and perforated appendicitis. Primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of serum bilirubin levels in discriminating between no appendiceal inflammation and any appendicitis (perforated and non-perforated appendicitis) and non-perforated and perforated appendicitis.
Of 493 analysed patients, 125 (25%) had no appendiceal inflammation, 312 (64%) had non-perforated appendicitis and 56 (11%) had perforated appendicitis. The proportion of patients with bilirubin elevation (>1.1 mg/dL) was different between those with no appendiceal inflammation (14%) and any appendicitis (36%) (p<0.0001), and between non-perforated appendicitis and perforated appendicitis 48% (p=0.04). However, the positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) for an elevated bilirubin were poor at discriminating the groups: no appendiceal inflammation versus any appendicitis (LR+ 2.62 (95% CI 1.65 to 4.16) and LR- 0.75 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.83)) and non-perforated appendicitis versus perforated appendicitis (LR+ estimate 1.74 (95% CI 1.28 to 2.38) and LR- 0.72 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.93)).
Hyperbilirubinaemia is present in acute appendicitis but has a low diagnostic accuracy in discriminating between any appendicitis versus no appendiceal inflammation and perforated versus non-perforated appendicitis and is, therefore, of limited value in clinical routine.
NCT01698099.
据报道,高胆红素血症是诊断阑尾炎尤其是阑尾穿孔的一个阳性预测指标。因此,我们分析了血清胆红素在预测阑尾炎及其严重程度方面的诊断准确性。
对2009年5月至2011年8月期间所有因疑似阑尾炎接受阑尾切除术的连续患者进行分析。根据最终组织病理学检查结果将患者分为以下几组:无阑尾炎症、非穿孔性阑尾炎和穿孔性阑尾炎。主要结局是血清胆红素水平在区分无阑尾炎症与任何阑尾炎(穿孔性和非穿孔性阑尾炎)以及非穿孔性阑尾炎与穿孔性阑尾炎方面的诊断准确性。
在493例分析患者中,125例(25%)无阑尾炎症,312例(64%)患有非穿孔性阑尾炎,56例(11%)患有穿孔性阑尾炎。无阑尾炎症患者(14%)和任何阑尾炎患者(36%)中胆红素升高(>1.1mg/dL)的患者比例不同(p<0.0001),非穿孔性阑尾炎和穿孔性阑尾炎患者中这一比例分别为48%(p=0.04)。然而,胆红素升高的阳性和阴性似然比在区分各组时效果不佳:无阑尾炎症与任何阑尾炎(阳性似然比2.62(95%CI 1.65至4.16),阴性似然比0.75(95%CI 0.67至0.83))以及非穿孔性阑尾炎与穿孔性阑尾炎(阳性似然比估计值1.74(95%CI 1.28至2.38),阴性似然比0.72(95%CI 0.55至0.93))。
急性阑尾炎患者存在高胆红素血症,但在区分任何阑尾炎与无阑尾炎症以及穿孔性与非穿孔性阑尾炎方面诊断准确性较低,因此在临床常规中价值有限。
NCT01698099。