Lubelski Daniel, Senol Nilgun, Silverstein Michael P, Alvin Matthew D, Benzel Edward C, Mroz Thomas E, Schlenk Richard
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Feb;22(2):173-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14359. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
The authors investigated quality of life (QOL) outcomes after primary versus revision discectomy.
A retrospective review was performed for all patients who had undergone a primary or revision discectomy at the Cleveland Clinic Center for Spine Health from January 2008 through December 2011. Among patients in the revision cohort, they identified those who needed a second revision discectomy. Patient QOL measures were recorded before and after surgery. These measures included responses to the EQ-5D health questionnaire, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Pain and Disability Questionnaire, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Cohorts were compared by using independent-sample t-tests and Fisher exact tests for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for confounding.
A total of 196 patients were identified (116 who underwent primary discectomy and 80 who underwent revision discectomy); average follow-up time was 150 days. There were no preoperative QOL differences between groups. Postoperatively, both groups improved significantly in all QOL measures. For QALYs, the primary cohort improved by 0.25 points (p<0.001) and the revision cohort improved by 0.18 points (p<0.001). QALYs improved for significantly more patients in the primary than in the revision cohort (76% vs 59%, respectively; p=0.02), and improvement exceeded the minimum clinically important difference for more patients in the primary cohort (62% vs 45%, respectively; p=0.03). Of the 80 patients who underwent revision discectomy, yet another recurrent herniation (third herniation) occurred in 14 (17.5%). Of these, 4 patients (28.6%) chose to undergo a second revision discectomy and the other 10 (71.4%) underwent conservative management. For those who underwent a second revision discectomy, QOL worsened according to all questionnaire scores.
QOL, pain and disability, and psychosocial outcomes improved after primary and revision discectomy, but the improvement diminished after revision discectomy.
作者研究了初次与翻修椎间盘切除术后的生活质量(QOL)结果。
对2008年1月至2011年12月在克利夫兰诊所脊柱健康中心接受初次或翻修椎间盘切除术的所有患者进行回顾性研究。在翻修队列的患者中,他们确定了那些需要二次翻修椎间盘切除术的患者。记录患者手术前后的QOL指标。这些指标包括对EQ-5D健康问卷、患者健康问卷-9、疼痛与残疾问卷的回答以及质量调整生命年(QALY)。分别使用独立样本t检验和Fisher精确检验对连续变量和分类变量进行队列比较。进行多变量逻辑回归以调整混杂因素。
共确定了196例患者(116例行初次椎间盘切除术,80例行翻修椎间盘切除术);平均随访时间为150天。两组术前QOL无差异。术后,两组在所有QOL指标上均有显著改善。对于QALY,初次队列提高了0.25分(p<0.001),翻修队列提高了0.18分(p<0.001)。初次队列中QALY改善的患者明显多于翻修队列(分别为76%和59%;p=0.02),且初次队列中超过最小临床重要差异的患者更多(分别为62%和45%;p=0.03)。在80例行翻修椎间盘切除术的患者中,14例(17.5%)出现了再次复发的椎间盘突出(第三次突出)。其中,4例患者(28.6%)选择接受二次翻修椎间盘切除术,另外10例(71.4%)接受了保守治疗。对于接受二次翻修椎间盘切除术的患者,根据所有问卷评分,QOL均恶化。
初次和翻修椎间盘切除术后QOL、疼痛与残疾以及心理社会结果均有改善,但翻修椎间盘切除术后改善程度降低。