伴有和不伴有ST段抬高的急性冠脉综合征患者中,不同类型心房颤动的临床特征及院内死亡率
Clinical features and in-hospital mortality associated with different types of atrial fibrillation in patients with acute coronary syndrome with and without ST elevation.
作者信息
González-Pacheco Héctor, Márquez Manlio F, Arias-Mendoza Alexandra, Álvarez-Sangabriel Amada, Eid-Lidt Guering, González-Hermosillo Antonio, Azar-Manzur Francisco, Altamirano-Castillo Alfredo, Briseño-Cruz José Luis, García-Martínez Adolfo, Mendoza-García Salvador, Martínez-Sánchez Carlos
机构信息
Coronary Care Unit, National Institute of Cardiology, Mexico City, Mexico.
Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratory, National Institute of Cardiology, Mexico City, Mexico.
出版信息
J Cardiol. 2015 Aug;66(2):148-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
BACKGROUND
In patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), no conclusive agreement has been reached to date regarding the association between the different types of atrial fibrillation (AF) and the in-hospital mortality risk. We conducted a retrospective cohort study in patients with ACS to determine the prognostic implications of the different types of AF.
METHODS
We analyzed 6705 consecutive patients with ACS admitted to a coronary care unit (CCU), including 3094 with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 3611 with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). We identified the patients with pre-existing AF, new-onset AF at admission, and new-onset AF at the CCU.
RESULTS
The overall incidence of AF was documented in 360 (5.4%) of the patients (STEMI, 5%; NSTE-ACS, 5.6%), 140 (2.1%) of whom had pre-existing AF, and 220 (3.2%) of whom had new-onset AF (AF at admission, 1.3%; AF at the CCU, 1.9%). The patients with AF had high-risk clinical characteristics and developed major adverse events more frequently than did the patients without AF. The unadjusted in-hospital mortality risk was significantly higher in the patients with pre-existing AF (STEMI, 3.79-fold; NSTE-ACS, 3.4-fold) and AF at the CCU (STEMI, 2.02-fold; NSTE-ACS, 8.09-fold). After adjusting for the multivariate analysis, only the AF at the CCU in the NSTE-ACS group was associated with a 4.40-fold increase in the in-hospital mortality risk (odds ratio 4.40, CI 1.82-10.60, p=0.001). In the STEMI group, the presence of any type of AF was not associated with an increased risk of mortality.
CONCLUSION
Among the different types of AF in patients with ACS, only the new-onset AF that developed during the CCU stay in patients with NSTE-ACS was associated with a 4.40-fold increase in the in-hospital mortality risk.
背景
对于急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者,不同类型心房颤动(AF)与住院死亡率风险之间的关联,至今尚未达成确凿的共识。我们对ACS患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以确定不同类型AF的预后意义。
方法
我们分析了6705例连续入住冠心病监护病房(CCU)的ACS患者,其中包括3094例ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者和3611例非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者。我们确定了既往有AF的患者、入院时新发AF的患者以及在CCU新发AF的患者。
结果
记录到AF的总体发生率在3算60例(5.4%)患者中(STEMI患者为5%;NSTE-ACS患者为5.6%),其中140例(算2.1%)有既往AF,220例(3.2%)有新发AF(入院时AF为1.3%;在CCU时AF为1.9%)。AF患者具有高危临床特征,且比无AF的患者更频繁地发生主要不良事件。既往有AF的患者(STEMI患者中为3.79倍;NSTE-ACS患者中为3.4倍)和在CCU时发生AF的患者(STEMI患者中为2.02倍;NSTE-ACS患者中为8.09倍)的未调整住院死亡率风险显著更高。在进行多变量分析调整后,仅NSTE-ACS组在CCU时发生的AF与住院死亡率风险增加4.40倍相关(比值比4.40,CI 1.82-10.60,p=0.001)。在STEMI组中,任何类型的AF的存在均与死亡率增加风险无关。
结论
在ACS患者的不同类型AF中,仅NSTE-ACS患者在CCU住院期间发生的新发AF与住院死亡率风险增加4.40倍相关。