Suppr超能文献

simeprevir 与特拉匹韦联合聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒 1 型感染既往无应答或部分应答患者(ATTAIN):一项随机、双盲、非劣效性 3 期临床试验。

Simeprevir versus telaprevir with peginterferon and ribavirin in previous null or partial responders with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection (ATTAIN): a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority phase 3 trial.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Department of Medicine, JW Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Jan;15(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71002-3. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We did a phase 3 study in previous non-responders with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection and compensated liver disease that related to the standard of care for these patients at the time this study was initiated. We investigated whether simeprevir is non-inferior in terms of efficacy to telaprevir, each in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin.

METHODS

We did this randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial at 169 investigational sites in 24 countries. We enrolled adults (≥18 years) with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection, compensated liver disease, and plasma HCV RNA higher than 10 000 IU/mL who were null or partial responders during at least one previous course of peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin treatment. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients (stratified by HCV genotype 1 subtype [1a plus other/1b] and previous treatment response [partial or null]) to receive simeprevir (150 mg once a day) plus telaprevir placebo (three times a day 7-9 h apart) or telaprevir (750 mg three times a day) plus simeprevir placebo (once a day) in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for 12 weeks followed by 36 weeks of peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin alone. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virological response 12 weeks after end of treatment (SVR12) in the intention-to-treat and the per-protocol population. We compared groups with the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. We established a non-inferiority margin of 12%. Adverse events were reported descriptively. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01485991.

FINDINGS

Patient screening began on Jan 19, 2012, and the last visit was on April 7, 2014. We included 763 patients (472 previous null responders [62%]). Simeprevir and peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin was non-inferior to telaprevir and peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for SVR12 (54% [203/379] vs 55% [210/384]; difference -1·1%, 95% CI -7·8 to 5·5; p=0·0007). SVR12 was achieved in 70% (101/145) versus 68% (100/146) of previous partial responders and 44% (102/234) versus 46% (110/238) of previous null responders with simeprevir and peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin and telaprevir and peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin treatment, respectively. We recorded differences between treatment groups in simeprevir or telaprevir-related adverse events (69% [261/379] in the simeprevir group vs 86% [330/384] in the telaprevir group), serious adverse events (2% [8/379] vs 9% [33/384]), and adverse events leading to simeprevir or telaprevir discontinuation (2% [7/379] vs 8% [32/384]).

INTERPRETATION

Simeprevir once a day with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin was well tolerated in HCV genotype 1-infected previous non-responders and was non-inferior to telaprevir, thus providing an alternative treatment in areas of the world where all-oral HCV regimens are not available or accessible.

FUNDING

Janssen.

摘要

背景

我们之前进行了一项针对慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)基因型 1 感染和代偿性肝病的既往无应答者的 3 期研究,该研究与本研究开始时这些患者的标准治疗相关。我们研究了simeprevir 是否在疗效方面不劣于 telaprevir,每种药物均与聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 和利巴韦林联合使用。

方法

我们在 24 个国家的 169 个研究地点进行了这项随机、双盲、3 期试验。我们招募了年龄在 18 岁及以上的慢性 HCV 基因型 1 感染、代偿性肝病和血浆 HCV RNA 高于 10000 IU/mL 的成年人,他们在至少一次以前的聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 和利巴韦林治疗中是部分或完全无应答者。我们将患者(按 HCV 基因型 1 亚型[1a 加其他/1b]和以前的治疗反应[部分或完全无应答]进行分层)随机分配(1:1)接受simeprevir(每天 150 mg 一次)加 telaprevir 安慰剂(每天三次,间隔 7-9 小时)或 telaprevir(每天三次,每次 750 mg)加 simeprevir 安慰剂(每天一次),与聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 和利巴韦林联合使用 12 周,然后单独使用聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 和利巴韦林 36 周。主要疗效终点是治疗结束后 12 周的持续病毒学应答(SVR12),在意向治疗和方案人群中。我们使用 Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel 检验比较组间差异。我们设定了 12%的非劣效性边界。不良反应以描述性方式报告。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT01485991。

结果

患者筛选于 2012 年 1 月 19 日开始,最后一次就诊时间为 2014 年 4 月 7 日。我们纳入了 763 名患者(472 名既往完全无应答者[62%])。simeprevir 和聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 加利巴韦林与 telaprevir 和聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 加利巴韦林相比,在 SVR12 方面不劣效(54%[379 例中的 203 例]与 55%[384 例中的 210 例];差异-1.1%,95%CI-7.8 至 5.5;p=0.0007)。在以前的部分应答者中,simeprevir 和聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 加利巴韦林与 telaprevir 和聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 加利巴韦林治疗的 SVR12 分别为 70%(101/145)和 68%(100/146),在以前的完全无应答者中分别为 44%(102/234)和 46%(110/238)。我们记录了 simeprevir 或 telaprevir 相关不良反应(simeprevir 组 69%[379 例中的 261 例]与 telaprevir 组 86%[384 例中的 330 例])、严重不良事件(2%[379 例中的 8 例]与 9%[384 例中的 33 例])和导致 simeprevir 或 telaprevir 停药的不良事件(2%[379 例中的 7 例]与 8%[384 例中的 32 例])之间的差异。

解释

simeprevir 每天一次与聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 和利巴韦林联合使用在 HCV 基因型 1 感染的既往无应答者中耐受性良好,并且在疗效方面不劣于 telaprevir,因此在全球范围内不能或无法获得所有口服 HCV 治疗方案的地区提供了一种替代治疗方法。

资金来源

Janssen。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验