McCabe O Lee, Semon Natalie L, Thompson Carol B, Lating Jeffrey M, Everly George S, Perry Charlene J, Moore Suzanne Straub, Mosley Adrian M, Links Jonathan M
1Department of Mental Health and the Center for Public Health Preparedness,Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,Johns Hopkins School of Medicine,Baltimore,Maryland.
2Department of Environmental Health Sciences,Center for Public Health Preparedness,Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,Baltimore,Maryland.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2014 Dec;8(6):511-26. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2014.119. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
Working within a series of partnerships among an academic health center, local health departments (LHDs), and faith-based organizations (FBOs), we validated companion interventions to address community mental health planning and response challenges in public health emergency preparedness.
We implemented the project within the framework of an enhanced logic model and employed a multi-cohort, pre-test/post-test design to assess the outcomes of 1-day workshops in psychological first aid (PFA) and guided preparedness planning (GPP). The workshops were delivered to urban and rural communities in eastern and midwestern regions of the United States. Intervention effectiveness was based on changes in relevant knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs) and on several behavioral indexes.
Significant improvements were observed in self-reported and objectively measured KSAs across all cohorts. Additionally, GPP teams proved capable of producing quality drafts of basic community disaster plans in 1 day, and PFA trainees confirmed upon follow-up that their training proved useful in real-world trauma contexts. We documented examples of policy and practice changes at the levels of local and state health departments.
Given appropriate guidance, LHDs and FBOs can implement an effective and potentially scalable model for promoting disaster mental health preparedness and community resilience, with implications for positive translational impact.
通过在学术健康中心、地方卫生部门(LHD)和基于信仰的组织(FBO)之间建立一系列合作伙伴关系,我们验证了相关配套干预措施,以应对公共卫生应急准备中社区心理健康规划和应对方面的挑战。
我们在强化逻辑模型的框架内实施该项目,并采用多队列、前测/后测设计来评估心理急救(PFA)和指导性准备规划(GPP)一日工作坊的效果。这些工作坊面向美国东部和中西部地区的城市和农村社区开展。干预效果基于相关知识、技能和态度(KSA)的变化以及若干行为指标。
在所有队列中,自我报告和客观测量的KSA均有显著改善。此外,GPP团队证明能够在一天内完成基本社区灾难计划的高质量草案,PFA学员在随访中确认他们的培训在实际创伤情境中很有用。我们记录了地方和州卫生部门层面政策和实践变化的实例。
在适当的指导下,地方卫生部门和基于信仰的组织可以实施一个有效且可能可扩展的模型,以促进灾难心理健康准备和社区复原力,具有积极的转化影响。