Ferreira C E R, Sávio D B, Guarise A C, Flach M J, Gastal G D A, Gonçalves A O, Dellagostin O A, Alonso R V, Bianchi I, Corcini C D, Lucia T
ReproPEL, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, 96010-900, Pelotas-RS, Brazil.
Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, 96010-900, Pelotas-RS, Brazil.
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2015 Sep;27(7):1012-9. doi: 10.1071/RD13418.
Heterospermic AI is commonly used in swine despite preventing precise evaluation of individual boar fertility. The present study compared the contribution of four boars (A, B, C and D) for reproductive performance and for paternity using homospermic and heterospermic (AB, AC, AD, BC, BD and CD) AI (n=204 for homospermic AI; n=307 for heterospermic AI). Blood samples from the four boars, from all sows inseminated with heterospermic doses and from the umbilical cords of their piglets, as well as tissue smears from mummified fetuses, were genotyped using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Differences among boars were detected for the in vitro oocyte penetration rate and for the number of spermatozoa per oocyte (P<0.05), but not for sperm motility, mitochondrial functionality and integrity of the membrane, acrosome and DNA (P>0.05). Homospermic and heterospermic AI resulted in similar (P>0.05) farrowing rates (90.5% and 89.9%, respectively) and total litter size (12.4±0.4 and 12.7±0.7, respectively). Farrowing rate was lower for Boar B than for Boar C (P<0.05), but no other differences in reproductive performance among boars were observed with homospermic AI. The SNPs determined the paternity of 94.2% of the piglets sired by heterospermic AI. In the AC pool, paternity contribution per boar was similar (P>0.05), but differences between boars occurred in all other pools (P<0.05). Boar D achieved the greatest paternity contribution in all pools and parity categories (nearly 60%), whereas Boar B sired the fewest piglets (at most 40%). Reproductive performance was similar with homospermic and heterospermic AI, but differences in performance among boars undetected with homospermic AI were only evident after genotyping the piglets sired through heterospermic AI.
尽管异精人工授精(AI)妨碍了对个体公猪生育力的精确评估,但它在猪的繁殖中仍被广泛使用。本研究比较了四头公猪(A、B、C和D)在同精人工授精和异精人工授精(AB、AC、AD、BC、BD和CD)中的繁殖性能和父系贡献(同精人工授精n = 204;异精人工授精n = 307)。使用单核苷酸多态性(SNP)对四头公猪、所有接受异精剂量授精的母猪及其仔猪脐带的血样,以及木乃伊化胎儿的组织涂片进行基因分型。检测到公猪之间在体外卵母细胞穿透率和每个卵母细胞的精子数量上存在差异(P<0.05),但在精子活力、线粒体功能以及膜、顶体和DNA的完整性方面没有差异(P>0.05)。同精人工授精和异精人工授精的产仔率(分别为90.5%和89.9%)和总产仔数(分别为12.4±0.4和12.7±0.7)相似(P>0.05)。公猪B的产仔率低于公猪C(P<0.05),但在同精人工授精中未观察到公猪之间在繁殖性能上的其他差异。SNP确定了异精人工授精所产仔猪中94.2%的父系。在AC组合中,每头公猪的父系贡献相似(P>0.05),但在所有其他组合中,公猪之间存在差异(P<0.05)。公猪D在所有组合和平等类别中父系贡献最大(近60%),而公猪B所产仔猪最少(最多40%)。同精人工授精和异精人工授精的繁殖性能相似,但同精人工授精未检测到的公猪之间的性能差异,仅在对异精人工授精所产仔猪进行基因分型后才明显。