• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用儿科方案与成人方案治疗的青少年急性淋巴细胞白血病的结局

Outcome of Adolescents with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated by Pediatrics versus Adults Protocols.

作者信息

Ibrahim Abeer, Ali Amany, Mohammed Mahmoud M

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology and Hematological Malignancy, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, El Methaq Street, Assiut, Egypt.

Department of Pediatrics Oncology and Hematological Malignancy, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Egypt.

出版信息

Adv Hematol. 2014;2014:697675. doi: 10.1155/2014/697675. Epub 2014 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1155/2014/697675
PMID:25484902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4251645/
Abstract

Objective. Several studies showed better outcome in adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with pediatrics protocols than similarly aged patients treated with adults protocols, while other studies showed similar outcome of both protocols. We conducted this study to compare the outcome of our pediatrics and adults therapeutic protocols in treatment of adolescents ALL. Patients and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed files of 86 consecutive adolescent ALL patients aged 15-18 years who attended to outpatients clinic from January 2003 to January 2010. 32 out of 86 were treated with pediatrics adopted BFM 90 high risk protocol while 54 were treated with adults adopted BFM protocol. We analyzed the effect of different treatment protocols on achieving complete remission (CR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results. The 2 patients groups have almost similar characteristics. The CR was significantly higher in pediatrics protocol 96% versus 89% (P = 0.001). Despite the fact that the toxicity profiles were higher in pediatrics protocol, they were tolerable. Moreover, the pediatrics protocol resulted in superior outcome in EFS 67% versus 39% (P = 0.001), DFS 65% versus 41% (P = 0.000), and OS 67% versus 45% (P = 0.000). Conclusion. Our study's findings recommend using intensified pediatrics inspired protocol to treat adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

摘要

目的。多项研究表明,采用儿科方案治疗的青少年和青年急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患者,其治疗效果优于采用成人方案治疗的同龄患者,而其他研究则显示两种方案的治疗效果相似。我们开展本研究以比较儿科和成人治疗方案在青少年ALL治疗中的效果。患者与方法。我们回顾性分析了2003年1月至2010年1月期间在门诊就诊的86例年龄在15 - 18岁的连续性青少年ALL患者的病历。86例患者中,32例采用儿科采用的BFM 90高危方案治疗,54例采用成人采用的BFM方案治疗。我们分析了不同治疗方案对实现完全缓解(CR)、无病生存(DFS)和总生存(OS)的影响。结果。两组患者的特征几乎相似。儿科方案的CR显著更高,为96%,而成人方案为89%(P = 0.001)。尽管儿科方案的毒性反应更高,但仍可耐受。此外,儿科方案在无事件生存(EFS)方面的效果更优,分别为67%和39%(P = 0.001),DFS分别为65%和41%(P = 0.000),OS分别为67%和45%(P = 0.000)。结论。我们研究的结果建议采用强化儿科启发的方案治疗青少年急性淋巴细胞白血病。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ad/4251645/9ba05c76f7a9/AH2014-697675.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ad/4251645/bede8d376ffa/AH2014-697675.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ad/4251645/9ba05c76f7a9/AH2014-697675.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ad/4251645/bede8d376ffa/AH2014-697675.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ad/4251645/9ba05c76f7a9/AH2014-697675.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcome of Adolescents with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated by Pediatrics versus Adults Protocols.采用儿科方案与成人方案治疗的青少年急性淋巴细胞白血病的结局
Adv Hematol. 2014;2014:697675. doi: 10.1155/2014/697675. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
2
Outcomes and prognostic factors in adolescents and young adults with ALL treated with a modified BFM-90 protocol.采用改良 BFM-90 方案治疗 ALL 的青少年和年轻成人的结果和预后因素。
Blood Adv. 2021 Mar 9;5(5):1178-1193. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003526.
3
Comparison of the results of the treatment of adolescents and young adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Programa Español de Tratamiento en Hematología pediatric-based protocol ALL-96.采用基于儿科血液学治疗方案ALL-96的西班牙血液学治疗方案对青少年和青年标准风险急性淋巴细胞白血病患者的治疗结果比较。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 10;26(11):1843-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.7265.
4
Should adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia be treated as old children or young adults? Comparison of the French FRALLE-93 and LALA-94 trials.急性淋巴细胞白血病青少年患者应按大龄儿童还是青年成人进行治疗?法国FRALLE - 93和LALA - 94试验的比较。
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Mar 1;21(5):774-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.02.053.
5
The effect of adopting pediatric protocols in adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in pediatric vs adult centers: An IMPACT Cohort study.儿科方案在儿科与成人中心治疗青少年和年轻成人急性淋巴细胞白血病中的效果:IMPACT 队列研究。
Cancer Med. 2019 May;8(5):2095-2103. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2096. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
6
The long-term results of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia at two centers from Turkey: 15 years of experience with the ALL-BFM 95 protocol.土耳其两个中心儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病的长期结果:ALL-BFM 95方案15年的经验
Ann Hematol. 2014 Oct;93(10):1677-84. doi: 10.1007/s00277-014-2106-0. Epub 2014 May 27.
7
Improved survival in adolescents and young adults (AYA) patients aged 14-55 years with acute lymphoblastic leukemia using pediatric-inspired protocol - a retrospective analysis of a real-world experience in 79 of patients treated at a national tertiary care referral center.采用儿童启发式方案改善14至55岁急性淋巴细胞白血病青少年和青年(AYA)患者的生存率——对一家国家三级医疗转诊中心治疗的79例患者真实世界经验的回顾性分析
Leuk Res Rep. 2021 Sep 24;16:100270. doi: 10.1016/j.lrr.2021.100270. eCollection 2021.
8
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Young Adults Treated with Intensive "Pediatric" Type Protocol.采用强化“儿科”类型方案治疗的年轻成人急性淋巴细胞白血病
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2018 Jul;34(3):422-429. doi: 10.1007/s12288-017-0892-y. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
9
Prognostic factors in adolescent and adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia with two protocols of chemotherapy: a cross-sectional study.采用两种化疗方案的青少年及成年急性淋巴细胞白血病患者的预后因素:一项横断面研究
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2015 Jan;15(1):e7-e14. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
10
Results of Treating Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in a Low-middle Income Country: 10 Year Experience in Northeast Mexico.中低收入国家儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病的治疗结果:墨西哥东北部 10 年经验。
Arch Med Res. 2016 Nov;47(8):668-676. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2017.01.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia: why do adolescents and young adults outcomes differ from those of children? A retrospective study on behalf of the Francophone Society of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC).造血干细胞移植治疗急性淋巴细胞白血病:为什么青少年和年轻成人的结果与儿童不同?一项代表法语国家造血干细胞移植和细胞治疗学会(SFGM-TC)的回顾性研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Apr;149(4):1473-1483. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04021-1. Epub 2022 May 4.
2
Levocarnitine does not impair chemotherapy cytotoxicity against acute lymphoblastic leukemia.左卡尼汀不会损害针对急性淋巴细胞白血病的化疗细胞毒性。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2020 Feb;61(2):420-428. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1666379. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The history of leukemia therapy--a personal journey.白血病治疗的历史——个人历程。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2012 Dec;12(6):386-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2012.09.014.
2
Pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: where are we going and how do we get there?小儿急性淋巴细胞白血病:我们将去向何方,又该如何到达那里?
Blood. 2012 Aug 9;120(6):1165-74. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-05-378943. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
3
Outcomes in older adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL): results from the international MRC UKALL XII/ECOG2993 trial.
Risk-Benefit Analysis of Pediatric-Inspired Versus Hyperfractionated Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone Protocols for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adolescents and Young Adults.青少年和青年急性淋巴细胞白血病中,儿童启发式与超分割环磷酰胺、长春新碱、多柔比星和地塞米松方案的风险效益分析
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2017 Mar;6(1):53-61. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2016.0049. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
4
The Relationship Between Risk Factors and Survival in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.成人急性淋巴细胞白血病危险因素与生存的关系
Iran J Cancer Prev. 2016 Aug 10;9(4):e5045. doi: 10.17795/ijcp-5045. eCollection 2016 Aug.
5
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in a Young Adult Presenting as Hepatitis and Acute Kidney Injury.一名青年成人急性淋巴细胞白血病表现为肝炎和急性肾损伤。
J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep. 2016 Sep 22;4(3):2324709616665866. doi: 10.1177/2324709616665866. eCollection 2016 Jul-Sep.
老年急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患者的结局:来自国际 MRC UKALL XII/ECOG2993 试验的结果。
Br J Haematol. 2012 May;157(4):463-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09095.x. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
4
Chemoimmunotherapy with a modified hyper-CVAD and rituximab regimen improves outcome in de novo Philadelphia chromosome-negative precursor B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia.采用改良的高剂量环磷酰胺、长春新碱、多柔比星和地塞米松联合利妥昔单抗方案治疗初发费城染色体阴性前 B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病可改善预后。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug 20;28(24):3880-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.9456. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
5
Treating childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia without cranial irradiation.不进行颅脑照射治疗儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 25;360(26):2730-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900386.
6
Pediatric-inspired therapy in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the GRAALL-2003 study.针对费城染色体阴性成人急性淋巴细胞白血病的儿童启发式疗法:GRAALL - 2003研究
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 20;27(6):911-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.6916. Epub 2009 Jan 5.
7
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adolescents and young adults in Finland.芬兰青少年和年轻成人中的急性淋巴细胞白血病
Haematologica. 2008 Aug;93(8):1161-8. doi: 10.3324/haematol.12466. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
8
What determines the outcomes for adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on cooperative group protocols? A comparison of Children's Cancer Group and Cancer and Leukemia Group B studies.对于按照协作组方案接受治疗的青少年及青年急性淋巴细胞白血病患者,是什么决定了其治疗结果?儿童癌症组与癌症和白血病B组研究的比较。
Blood. 2008 Sep 1;112(5):1646-54. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-130237. Epub 2008 May 23.
9
Comparison of the results of the treatment of adolescents and young adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Programa Español de Tratamiento en Hematología pediatric-based protocol ALL-96.采用基于儿科血液学治疗方案ALL-96的西班牙血液学治疗方案对青少年和青年标准风险急性淋巴细胞白血病患者的治疗结果比较。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 10;26(11):1843-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.7265.
10
Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.急性淋巴细胞白血病
Lancet. 2008 Mar 22;371(9617):1030-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60457-2.