Anderson Julie, Perry Heather R
a School of History , University of Kent , Canterbury , UK.
Med Confl Surviv. 2014 Oct-Dec;30(4):227-51. doi: 10.1080/13623699.2014.962724. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
This article offers a comparative analysis of the evolution of orthopaedics and rehabilitation within German and British military medicine during the Great War. In it, we reveal how the field of orthopaedics became integral to military medicine by tracing the evolution of the discipline and its practitioners in each nation during the war. In doing so, however, we document not only when and why both medical specialists and military officials realized that maintaining their respective national fighting forces depended upon the efficient rehabilitation of wounded soldiers, but also how these rehabilitative practices and goals reflected the particularities of the military context, civilian society and social structure of each nation. Thus, while our comparison reveals a number of similarities in the orthopaedic developments within each nation as a response to the Great War, we also reveal significant national differences in war-time medical goals, rehabilitation treatments and soldierly 'medical experiences'. Moreover, as we demonstrate, a social and cultural re-conceptualization of the disabled body accompanied the medical advancements developed for him; however, this re-conceptualization was not the same in each nation. Thus, what our article reveals is that although the guns of August fell silent in 1918, the war's medical experiences lingered long thereafter shaping the future of disability medicine in both nations.
本文对第一次世界大战期间德国和英国军事医学中骨科与康复医学的发展进行了比较分析。在文中,我们通过追溯战争期间每个国家该学科及其从业者的发展历程,揭示了骨科领域是如何成为军事医学不可或缺的一部分。然而,在这样做的过程中,我们不仅记录了医学专家和军事官员何时以及为何意识到维持各自国家的战斗力量取决于受伤士兵的有效康复,还记录了这些康复实践和目标如何反映每个国家军事背景、民间社会和社会结构的特殊性。因此,虽然我们的比较揭示了每个国家在应对第一次世界大战时骨科发展方面的一些相似之处,但我们也揭示了战时医疗目标、康复治疗和士兵“医疗经历”方面的重大国家差异。此外,正如我们所展示的,随着为残疾军人开发的医学进步,对残疾军人身体的社会和文化重新概念化也随之而来;然而,每个国家的这种重新概念化并不相同。因此,我们的文章揭示的是,尽管1918年8月的枪炮声沉寂了,但战争的医疗经历此后长期存在,塑造了这两个国家残疾医学的未来。