McNabb Ryan P, Farsiu Sina, Stinnett Sandra S, Izatt Joseph A, Kuo Anthony N
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Ophthalmology. 2015 Apr;122(4):677-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
To determine the ability of motion-corrected optical coherence tomography (OCT) to measure the corneal refractive power change due to LASIK.
Evaluation of a diagnostic test or technology in a cohort.
A total of 70 eyes from 37 subjects undergoing LASIK were measured preoperatively. A total of 39 eyes from 22 subjects were measured postoperatively and completed the study.
Consecutive patients undergoing LASIK at the Duke Eye Center who consented to participate were imaged with Placido-ring topography, Scheimpflug photography, and OCT on the day of their surgery. Patients were then reimaged with the same imaging systems at the postoperative month 3 visit. Change in preoperative to postoperative corneal refractive power as measured by each of the imaging modalities was compared with the preoperative to postoperative change in manifest refraction (MRx) using the t test with generalized estimating equations.
Corneal refractive power change due to LASIK as measured by Placido-ring topography, Scheimpflug photography, and OCT compared with the MRx change vertexed to the corneal plane. The change in MRx should correspond to the change in the corneal refractive power from LASIK and was considered the reference measurement.
In 22 individuals (39 eyes) returning after LASIK, we found no significant difference between the clinically measured pre- to post-LASIK change in MRx and both Scheimpflug photography (P = 0.714) and OCT (P = 0.216). In contrast, keratometry values from Placido-ring topography were found to be significantly different from the measured refractive change (P < 0.001). In addition, of the 3 imaging modalities, OCT recorded the smallest mean absolute difference from the reference measurement with the least amount of variability.
Motion-corrected OCT more accurately measures the change in corneal refractive power due to laser refractive surgery than other currently available clinical devices. By offering accurate corneal refractive power measurements in normal and surgically modified subjects, OCT offers a compelling alternative to current clinical devices for determining corneal refractive power.
确定运动校正光学相干断层扫描(OCT)测量准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)引起的角膜屈光力变化的能力。
对一组人群中的诊断测试或技术进行评估。
对37例行LASIK手术的受试者的70只眼睛进行术前测量。对22例受试者的39只眼睛进行术后测量并完成研究。
在杜克眼科中心接受LASIK手术且同意参与的连续患者在手术当天接受Placido环地形图、Scheimpflug摄影和OCT检查。然后在术后3个月复诊时使用相同的成像系统对患者进行再次成像。使用广义估计方程的t检验,将每种成像方式测量的术前至术后角膜屈光力变化与术前至术后明显验光(MRx)的变化进行比较。
通过Placido环地形图、Scheimpflug摄影和OCT测量的LASIK引起的角膜屈光力变化与顶点位于角膜平面的MRx变化进行比较。MRx的变化应与LASIK引起的角膜屈光力变化相对应,并被视为参考测量值。
在22例(39只眼睛)LASIK术后复诊的个体中,我们发现临床测量的LASIK术前至术后MRx变化与Scheimpflug摄影(P = 0.714)和OCT(P = 0.216)之间均无显著差异。相比之下,发现Placido环地形图的角膜曲率计值与测量的屈光变化有显著差异(P < 0.001)。此外,在这三种成像方式中,OCT记录的与参考测量值的平均绝对差异最小,变异性最小。
与其他现有临床设备相比,运动校正OCT能更准确地测量激光屈光手术引起的角膜屈光力变化。通过在正常和手术改变的受试者中提供准确的角膜屈光力测量,OCT为当前用于确定角膜屈光力的临床设备提供了一个有吸引力的替代方案。