• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《平价医疗法案》的儿科基本健康福利导致了各州覆盖范围参差不齐且存在排除条款的情况。

The ACA's pediatric essential health benefit has resulted in a state-by-state patchwork of coverage with exclusions.

作者信息

Grace Aimee M, Noonan Kathleen G, Cheng Tina L, Miller Dorothy, Verga Brittany, Rubin David, Rosenbaum Sara

机构信息

Aimee M. Grace (

Kathleen G. Noonan is codirector of the PolicyLab and a member of the Division of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and a faculty member in the Master of Public Health Program at the University of Pennsylvania, in Philadelphia.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Dec;33(12):2136-43. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0743.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0743
PMID:25489031
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4587658/
Abstract

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) establishes essential health benefits as the coverage standard for health plans sold in the individual and small-group markets for all fifty states and the District of Columbia, including the health insurance Marketplaces. "Pediatric services" is one of the required classes of coverage under the ACA. However, other than oral health and vision care, neither the act nor the regulations for implementing it define what these services should be. We investigated how state benchmark plans-the base plan chosen in each state as the standard or benchmark of coverage in that state under ACA rules-address pediatric coverage in plans governed by the essential health benefits standard. Our review of summaries of all the state benchmark plans found that no state specified a distinct pediatric services benefit class. Furthermore, although benchmark plans explicitly included multiple pediatric conditions, many plans also specifically excluded services for children with special health care needs. The Department of Health and Human Services has made a commitment in the essential health benefits regulations to review its approach for the 2016 plan year. Thus, our findings have implications for future regulations regarding the essential health benefits standard for pediatric services.

摘要

《平价医疗法案》(ACA)将基本健康福利确立为在五十个州及哥伦比亚特区的个人和小团体市场(包括健康保险市场)销售的健康计划的覆盖标准。“儿科服务”是ACA规定的必需覆盖类别之一。然而,除了口腔健康和视力保健外,该法案及其实施条例均未界定这些服务应包括哪些内容。我们调查了各州的基准计划——根据ACA规则在每个州选定作为该州覆盖标准或基准的基础计划——如何处理受基本健康福利标准约束的计划中的儿科覆盖问题。我们对所有州基准计划摘要的审查发现,没有一个州指定了独特的儿科服务福利类别。此外,尽管基准计划明确包括多种儿科病症,但许多计划也特别排除了为有特殊医疗需求的儿童提供的服务。美国卫生与公众服务部已在基本健康福利条例中承诺,在2016计划年度审查其方法。因此,我们的研究结果对未来有关儿科服务基本健康福利标准的法规具有影响。

相似文献

1
The ACA's pediatric essential health benefit has resulted in a state-by-state patchwork of coverage with exclusions.《平价医疗法案》的儿科基本健康福利导致了各州覆盖范围参差不齐且存在排除条款的情况。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Dec;33(12):2136-43. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0743.
2
From EPSDT to EHBs: the future of pediatric coverage design under government financed health insurance.从 EPSDT 到 EHBs:政府资助的医疗保险下儿科保险范围设计的未来。
Pediatrics. 2013 Apr;131 Suppl 2:S142-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0252e.
3
The search for a national child health coverage policy.对全国儿童健康覆盖政策的探寻。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Dec;33(12):2125-35. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0906.
4
Complying with state and federal regulations on essential drug benefits: implementing the Affordable Care Act.遵守关于基本药物福利的州和联邦法规:实施《平价医疗法案》。
Am J Manag Care. 2014 Feb;20(2):153-8.
5
Implementing the Affordable Care Act: Revisiting the ACA's Essential Health Benefits Requirements.实施《平价医疗法案》:重新审视该法案的基本健康福利要求。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2014 Oct;28:1-10.
6
Have the ACA's Exchanges Succeeded? It's Complicated.《平价医疗法案》的交易所成功了吗?这很复杂。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2020 Aug 1;45(4):661-676. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8255577.
7
Building the Coverage Continuum: The Role of State Medicaid Directors and Insurance Commissioners.构建覆盖连续体:州医疗补助主任和保险专员的作用。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2017 Feb;4:1-10.
8
Low rates of pediatric dental coverage for families purchasing marketplace insurance plans.市场保险计划购买家庭的儿童牙科保险覆盖率较低。
J Public Health Dent. 2019 Dec;79(4):275-278. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12332. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
9
State insurance exchanges face challenges in offering standardized choices alongside innovative value-based insurance.国家保险交易所面临着在提供标准化选择的同时提供创新的基于价值的保险的挑战。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):418-26. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1072.
10
Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Programs: essential health benefits in alternative benefit plans, eligibility notices, fair hearing and appeal processes, and premiums and cost sharing; exchanges: eligibility and enrollment. Final rule.医疗补助和儿童健康保险计划:替代福利计划中的基本健康福利、资格通知、公平听证和上诉程序以及保费和费用分担;医保交易所:资格与参保。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2013 Jul 15;78(135):42159-322.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Evaluation of Pediatric Acute Care Hospital Referral Regions in Eight States.八个州儿科急性护理医院转诊区域的发展与评估
J Pediatr. 2025 Jan;276:114371. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114371. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
2
State Differences in Children's Mental Health Care.儿童心理健康护理的州际差异。
Acad Pediatr. 2025 Mar;25(2):102585. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2024.09.009. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
3
Addressing Disparities in Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease: A Call for Equitable Health Care.解决儿科先天性心脏病中的差异问题:呼吁公平的医疗保健。

本文引用的文献

1
Scope of health care benefits for children from birth through age 26.儿童从出生到 26 岁的医疗保健福利范围。
Pediatrics. 2012 Jan;129(1):185-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2936. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
2
Crossing the Medicaid-private insurance divide: the case of EPSDT.跨越医疗补助与私人保险的界限:以早期和定期筛查、诊断与治疗计划(EPSDT)为例
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):382-93. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.382.
3
Transforming the U.S. child health system.变革美国儿童健康体系。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jul 2;13(13):e032415. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032415. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
4
Implementation of state health insurance benefit mandates for cancer-related fertility preservation: following policy through a complex system.实施与癌症相关的生育力保存的国家健康保险福利授权:通过一个复杂的系统来贯彻政策。
Implement Sci. 2024 Feb 16;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01343-1.
5
Implementation of state health insurance benefit mandates for cancer-related fertility preservation: Following policy through a complex system.实施与癌症相关的生育力保存的国家健康保险福利授权:通过复杂系统贯彻政策。
Res Sq. 2023 Oct 9:rs.3.rs-3340894. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3340894/v1.
6
State of the Evidence for Use of Psychotropic Medications in School-Age Youth.学龄期青少年使用精神药物的证据状况
Children (Basel). 2023 Aug 26;10(9):1454. doi: 10.3390/children10091454.
7
Parent Ratings of Health Insurance Adequacy for Children with Emotional, Behavioral, or Developmental Problems.家长对有情绪、行为或发育问题儿童的健康保险充足程度的评价。
Acad Pediatr. 2023 Aug;23(6):1204-1212. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.10.020. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
8
Growth and Distribution of Child Psychiatrists in the United States: 2007-2016.美国儿童精神科医生的增长和分布:2007-2016 年。
Pediatrics. 2019 Dec;144(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-1576. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
9
Autism spectrum disorder, politics, and the generosity of insurance mandates in the United States.自闭症谱系障碍、政治与美国保险授权的慷慨性。
PLoS One. 2019 May 24;14(5):e0217064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217064. eCollection 2019.
10
Adult-Oriented Health Reform and Children's Insurance and Access to Care: Evidence from Massachusetts Health Reform.成人导向的医疗改革与儿童的保险和医疗可及性:来自马萨诸塞州医疗改革的证据。
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Aug;23(8):1008-1024. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02731-6.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):315-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.315.