Suppr超能文献

《平价医疗法案》的儿科基本健康福利导致了各州覆盖范围参差不齐且存在排除条款的情况。

The ACA's pediatric essential health benefit has resulted in a state-by-state patchwork of coverage with exclusions.

作者信息

Grace Aimee M, Noonan Kathleen G, Cheng Tina L, Miller Dorothy, Verga Brittany, Rubin David, Rosenbaum Sara

机构信息

Aimee M. Grace (

Kathleen G. Noonan is codirector of the PolicyLab and a member of the Division of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and a faculty member in the Master of Public Health Program at the University of Pennsylvania, in Philadelphia.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Dec;33(12):2136-43. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0743.

Abstract

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) establishes essential health benefits as the coverage standard for health plans sold in the individual and small-group markets for all fifty states and the District of Columbia, including the health insurance Marketplaces. "Pediatric services" is one of the required classes of coverage under the ACA. However, other than oral health and vision care, neither the act nor the regulations for implementing it define what these services should be. We investigated how state benchmark plans-the base plan chosen in each state as the standard or benchmark of coverage in that state under ACA rules-address pediatric coverage in plans governed by the essential health benefits standard. Our review of summaries of all the state benchmark plans found that no state specified a distinct pediatric services benefit class. Furthermore, although benchmark plans explicitly included multiple pediatric conditions, many plans also specifically excluded services for children with special health care needs. The Department of Health and Human Services has made a commitment in the essential health benefits regulations to review its approach for the 2016 plan year. Thus, our findings have implications for future regulations regarding the essential health benefits standard for pediatric services.

摘要

《平价医疗法案》(ACA)将基本健康福利确立为在五十个州及哥伦比亚特区的个人和小团体市场(包括健康保险市场)销售的健康计划的覆盖标准。“儿科服务”是ACA规定的必需覆盖类别之一。然而,除了口腔健康和视力保健外,该法案及其实施条例均未界定这些服务应包括哪些内容。我们调查了各州的基准计划——根据ACA规则在每个州选定作为该州覆盖标准或基准的基础计划——如何处理受基本健康福利标准约束的计划中的儿科覆盖问题。我们对所有州基准计划摘要的审查发现,没有一个州指定了独特的儿科服务福利类别。此外,尽管基准计划明确包括多种儿科病症,但许多计划也特别排除了为有特殊医疗需求的儿童提供的服务。美国卫生与公众服务部已在基本健康福利条例中承诺,在2016计划年度审查其方法。因此,我们的研究结果对未来有关儿科服务基本健康福利标准的法规具有影响。

相似文献

3
The search for a national child health coverage policy.对全国儿童健康覆盖政策的探寻。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Dec;33(12):2125-35. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0906.
6
Have the ACA's Exchanges Succeeded? It's Complicated.《平价医疗法案》的交易所成功了吗?这很复杂。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2020 Aug 1;45(4):661-676. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8255577.

引用本文的文献

2
State Differences in Children's Mental Health Care.儿童心理健康护理的州际差异。
Acad Pediatr. 2025 Mar;25(2):102585. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2024.09.009. Epub 2024 Oct 1.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验