Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Environmental and Water Studies, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Jan 6;49(1):423-31. doi: 10.1021/es504701j. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
Traditional beach management that uses concentrations of cultivatable fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) may lead to delayed notification of unsafe swimming conditions. Predictive, nowcast models of beach water quality may help reduce beach management errors and enhance protection of public health. This study compares performances of five different types of statistical, data-driven predictive models: multiple linear regression model, binary logistic regression model, partial least-squares regression model, artificial neural network, and classification tree, in predicting advisories due to FIB contamination at 25 beaches along the California coastline. Classification tree and the binary logistic regression model with threshold tuning are consistently the best performing model types for California beaches. Beaches with good performing models usually have a rainfall/flow related dominating factor affecting beach water quality, while beaches having a deteriorating water quality trend or low FIB exceedance rates are less likely to have a good performing model. This study identifies circumstances when predictive models are the most effective, and suggests that using predictive models for public notification of unsafe swimming conditions may improve public health protection at California beaches relative to current practices.
传统的海滩管理方法使用可培养的粪便指示细菌 (FIB) 的浓度,可能会导致不安全游泳条件的通知延迟。海滩水质的预测、实时模型可以帮助减少海滩管理错误,增强对公众健康的保护。本研究比较了五种不同类型的统计、数据驱动的预测模型在预测加利福尼亚海岸线 25 个海滩因 FIB 污染而发布警报方面的性能:多元线性回归模型、二元逻辑回归模型、偏最小二乘回归模型、人工神经网络和分类树。对于加利福尼亚海滩,分类树和具有阈值调整的二元逻辑回归模型始终是性能最好的模型类型。表现良好的模型的海滩通常有一个与降雨/流量相关的主导因素影响海滩水质,而水质恶化趋势或低 FIB 超标率的海滩不太可能有表现良好的模型。本研究确定了预测模型最有效的情况,并表明使用预测模型来通知公众不安全的游泳条件可能会相对于当前实践提高加利福尼亚海滩的公众健康保护。