aHeart Rhythm Management Centre, UZ Brussel-VUB, Brussels, BelgiumbDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2016 Mar;17(3):194-200. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000220.
Prolonged P-wave duration and dispersion are universally accepted noninvasive markers for atrial electrical remodeling. Our aim was to analyze P-wave indices as predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with normal left atrial size.
From January 2008 to December 2011, 426 patients with drug-resistant symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation underwent pulmonary vein isolation as an index procedure by conventional radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation in our center. Patients with left atrial dilatation, poor-quality electrocardiograms, atrial pacemaker stimulation, and those undergoing repeat procedures were excluded. A total of 201 patients were analyzed during a mean follow-up of 22 ± 16 months.
Patients with prolonged P-wave duration had higher rates of atrial fibrillation recurrences compared with those without prolonged P-wave duration (49 vs. 14%; P < 0.001). Atrial fibrillation recurrence was significantly associated with prolonged P-wave duration (129 ± 13 vs. 119 ± 11 ms; P < 0.001) and P-wave dispersion (54 ± 12 vs. 42 ± 10 ms; P < 0.001) compared with those who remained in sinus rhythm. P-wave duration and dispersion were independently associated with atrial fibrillation recurrence (hazard ratio 1.045, 95% confidence interval 1.027-1.063, P < 0.001; and hazard ratio 1.049, 95% confidence interval 1.022-1.078, P < 0.001, respectively), after adjusting for left atrial size and age.
Prolonged P-wave duration and dispersion were found to be independently associated with higher recurrence rates of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with normal left atrial dimension. Therefore, a prolongation of P-wave indices may help to identify those patients in whom electrical remodeling has already occurred and a more extensive ablation may be indicated.
P 波持续时间和离散度延长是公认的心房电重构的无创性标志物。我们的目的是分析 P 波指标,以预测左心房正常大小的阵发性心房颤动患者行肺静脉隔离术后心房颤动的复发。
2008 年 1 月至 2011 年 12 月,我院中心对 426 例药物难治性症状性阵发性心房颤动患者进行了肺静脉隔离术,作为常规射频或冷冻球囊消融的指标手术。排除左心房扩张、心电图质量差、心房起搏器刺激和重复手术的患者。在平均 22±16 个月的随访中,共分析了 201 例患者。
与无 P 波延长的患者相比,P 波持续时间延长的患者心房颤动复发率更高(49%比 14%;P<0.001)。与窦性节律相比,心房颤动复发与 P 波持续时间延长(129±13 比 119±11 ms;P<0.001)和 P 波离散度(54±12 比 42±10 ms;P<0.001)显著相关。P 波持续时间和离散度与心房颤动复发独立相关(风险比 1.045,95%置信区间 1.027-1.063,P<0.001;风险比 1.049,95%置信区间 1.022-1.078,P<0.001),调整左心房大小和年龄后。
在左心房正常大小的阵发性心房颤动患者中,P 波持续时间和离散度延长与肺静脉隔离术后心房颤动复发率升高独立相关。因此,P 波指标的延长可能有助于识别已经发生电重构的患者,并可能需要更广泛的消融。