Lin Hui-Ling, Harwood Robert J, Fink James B, Goodfellow Lynda T, Ari Arzu
Respiratory Therapy Program, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Division of Respiratory Therapy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Respir Care. 2015 Sep;60(9):1215-9. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03595. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
BACKGROUND: Aerosol drug delivery to infants and small children is influenced by many factors, such as types of interface, gas flows, and the designs of face masks. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate aerosol delivery during administration of gas flows across the range used clinically with high-flow humidity systems using 2 aerosol masks. METHODS: A spontaneous lung model was used to simulate an infant/young toddler up to 2 y of age and pediatric breathing patterns. Nebulized salbutamol by a vibrating mesh nebulizer positioned at the inlet of a high-flow humidification system at gas flows of 3, 6, and 12 L/min was delivered via pediatric face masks to a pediatric face mannequin attached to a filter. Aerosol particle size distribution exiting the vibrating mesh nebulizer and at the mask position distal to the heated humidifier with 3 flows was measured with a cascade impactor. Eluted drug from the filters and the impactor was analyzed with a spectrophotometer (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed by analysis of variance with a significant level of P < .05. RESULTS: The inhaled mass was between 2.8% and 8.1% among all settings and was significantly lower at 12 L/min (P = .004) in the pediatric model. Drug delivery with pediatric breathing was greater than with infant breathing (P = .004). The particle size distribution of aerosol emitted from the nebulizer was larger than the heated humidified aerosol exiting the tubing (P = .002), with no difference between the 3 flows (P = .10). CONCLUSIONS: The flows of gas entering the mask and breathing patterns influence aerosol delivery, independent of the face mask used. Aerosol delivery through a high-flow humidification system via mask could be effective with both infant and pediatric breathing patterns.
背景:向婴幼儿进行气溶胶药物递送受到多种因素影响,如接口类型、气流以及面罩设计。本体外研究的目的是使用两种气溶胶面罩,评估在临床使用的高流量加湿系统所涉及的气流范围内给药期间的气溶胶递送情况。 方法:使用一个自发肺模型来模拟年龄达2岁的婴幼儿及小儿呼吸模式。通过位于高流量加湿系统入口处的振动网式雾化器雾化沙丁胺醇,在气流为3、6和12升/分钟时,经儿科面罩递送至连接过滤器的儿科面部人体模型。使用多级冲击器测量从振动网式雾化器出来以及在加热加湿器远端面罩位置处、3种气流情况下的气溶胶粒径分布。用分光光度计分析从过滤器和冲击器洗脱的药物(n = 3)。采用方差分析进行统计分析,显著性水平为P <.05。 结果:在所有设置中,吸入质量在2.8%至8.1%之间,在儿科模型中,12升/分钟时显著更低(P =.004)。小儿呼吸模式下的药物递送大于婴儿呼吸模式下的递送(P =.004)。雾化器产生的气溶胶粒径分布大于从管道出来的加热加湿后的气溶胶粒径分布(P =.002),3种气流之间无差异(P =.10)。 结论:进入面罩的气流和呼吸模式影响气溶胶递送,与所使用的面罩无关。通过面罩经高流量加湿系统进行气溶胶递送对婴儿和小儿呼吸模式均可能有效。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2015-8
Respir Care. 2015-7
Respir Care. 2013-2-5
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2021-2
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2020-4
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2018-12-15