Division of Respiratory Therapy, School of Health Professions, Georgia State University, PO Box 4019, Atlanta GA 30302-4019, USA.
Respir Care. 2010 Jul;55(7):845-51.
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of aerosol drug delivery during mechanical ventilation is influenced by the patient, ventilator, and nebulizer variables. The impact of nebulizer type, position on the ventilator circuit, and bias flow on aerosol drug delivery has not been established for different age populations. OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of nebulizer position and bias flow with a jet nebulizer and a vibrating-mesh nebulizer on aerosol drug delivery in simulated and mechanically ventilated pediatric and adult patients. METHOD: Albuterol sulfate (2.5 mg) was nebulized with a jet nebulizer and a vibrating-mesh nebulizer, using simulated pediatric and adult lung models. The 2 nebulizer positions were: (1) jet nebulizer placed 15 cm from the Y-piece adapter, and vibrating-mesh nebulizer attached directly to the Y-piece; and (2) jet nebulizer placed prior to the heated humidifier with 15 cm of large-bore tubing, and vibrating-mesh nebulizer positioned at an inlet to the humidifier. A ventilator with a heated humidifier and ventilator circuit was utilized in both lung models. The adult ventilator settings were V(T) 500 mL, PEEP 5 cm H2O, respiratory rate 20 breaths/min, peak inspiratory flow 60 L/min, and descending ramp flow waveform. The pediatric ventilator settings were V(T) 100 mL, PEEP 5 cm H2O, respiratory rate 20 breaths/min, inspiratory time 1 s. We tested bias flows of 2 and 5 L/min. The adult and pediatric lung models used 8-mm and 5-mm inner-diameter endotracheal tubes, respectively. Each experiment was run 3 times (n = 3). The albuterol sulfate was eluted from the filter and analyzed via spectrophotometry (276 nm). RESULTS: Nebulizer placement prior to the humidifier increased drug delivery with both the jet nebulizer and the vibrating-mesh nebulizer, with a greater increase with the vibrating-mesh nebulizer. Higher bias flow reduced drug delivery. Drug delivery with the vibrating-mesh nebulizer was 2-4-fold greater than with the jet nebulizer at all positions (P < .05) in both lung models. CONCLUSION: During simulated mechanical ventilation in pediatric and adult models, bias flow and nebulizer type and position impact aerosol drug delivery.
背景:机械通气期间气溶胶药物输送的效果受患者、通气机和雾化器变量的影响。不同年龄人群的雾化器类型、在通气机回路中的位置以及偏流对气溶胶药物输送的影响尚未确定。
目的:确定在模拟和机械通气的儿科和成年患者中,使用射流雾化器和振动网孔雾化器时,雾化器位置和偏流对沙丁胺醇输送的影响。
方法:使用模拟儿科和成年肺模型,用射流雾化器和振动网孔雾化器雾化硫酸沙丁胺醇(2.5 毫克)。2 种雾化器位置为:(1)将射流雾化器放置在 Y 型件适配器 15cm 处,将振动网孔雾化器直接连接到 Y 型件;(2)将射流雾化器放置在带有 15cm 大口径管的加热加湿器之前,将振动网孔雾化器放置在加湿器入口处。在两个肺模型中都使用带有加热加湿器和通气机回路的通气机。成年通气机设置为 V(T)500mL,PEEP 5cmH2O,呼吸频率 20 次/分钟,吸气峰流速 60L/分钟,下降斜坡流速波形。儿科通气机设置为 V(T)100mL,PEEP 5cmH2O,呼吸频率 20 次/分钟,吸气时间 1s。我们测试了 2 和 5L/分钟的偏流。成人和儿科肺模型分别使用 8mm 和 5mm 内径的气管内导管。每个实验重复 3 次(n=3)。从过滤器中洗脱沙丁胺醇并通过分光光度法(276nm)进行分析。
结果:与射流雾化器和振动网孔雾化器相比,将雾化器放置在加湿器之前可增加药物输送,而振动网孔雾化器的增加更大。较高的偏流会降低药物输送。在两种肺模型中,振动网孔雾化器的药物输送均比射流雾化器高 2-4 倍(P<0.05)。
结论:在儿科和成年模型的模拟机械通气期间,偏流以及雾化器类型和位置会影响气溶胶药物输送。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2018-9-8
Pharmaceutics. 2025-2-8
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2025-4
J Intensive Care Soc. 2024-2