1 Consumer Product Testing Company, Inc. , Fairfield, New Jersey.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Mar;17(3):152-8. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0129. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
The accuracy of the Contour(®) Plus (Bayer HealthCare LLC, Diabetes Care, Whippany, NJ) blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS) was evaluated in two separate studies.
In the laboratory study, fingerstick samples from 100 subjects were tested in duplicate using three test strip lots and assessed per International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15197:2003, Section 7 (≥95% of results within ±15 mg/dL or ±20% of the reference result for samples with glucose concentrations <75 and ≥75 mg/dL, respectively) and ISO 15197:2013, Section 6.3 (≥95% of results within ±15 mg/dL or ±15% of the reference result for samples with glucose concentrations <100 and ≥100 mg/dL, respectively) accuracy criteria. In the clinical trial, 220 subjects with diabetes, naive to the BGMS, tested capillary glucose from fingertip and palm blood samples and completed an ease-of-use questionnaire. BGMS and YSI glucose analyzer results were compared.
In the laboratory study, 100% of results met ISO 15197:2003 and ISO 15197:2013 accuracy criteria. In the clinical trial, 100% and 99.1% of subject fingerstick results and 98.1% and 96.7% of subject palm results met ISO 15197:2003 and ISO 15197:2013 accuracy criteria, respectively. By Parkes Consensus Error Grid analysis, 100% of subject fingerstick results and 98.1% of subject palm results were within Zone A (remainder within Zone B). Questionnaire results showed most subjects found the BGMS easy to use.
The Contour Plus BGMS meets ISO 15197:2003 and ISO 15197:2013 accuracy criteria in the laboratory and when used by untrained individuals.
Contour(®)Plus(拜耳健康护理有限责任公司,糖尿病护理,惠帕尼,新泽西州)血糖仪(BGMS)的准确性在两项独立的研究中进行了评估。
在实验室研究中,使用三个测试条批次对 100 名受试者的指尖样本进行了重复测试,并根据国际标准化组织(ISO)15197:2003 第 7 节(血糖浓度<75mg/dL 或≥75mg/dL 的样本中,结果<95%在±15mg/dL 或参考结果的±20%范围内,分别)和 ISO 15197:2013 第 6.3 节(血糖浓度<100mg/dL 或≥100mg/dL 的样本中,结果<95%在±15mg/dL 或参考结果的±15%范围内,分别)进行了评估。在临床试验中,220 名对 BGMS 不熟悉的糖尿病患者测试了指尖和手掌血液样本的毛细血管血糖,并完成了易用性问卷。将 BGMS 和 YSI 血糖仪的结果进行了比较。
在实验室研究中,100%的结果符合 ISO 15197:2003 和 ISO 15197:2013 的准确性标准。在临床试验中,100%和 99.1%的受试者指尖结果和 98.1%和 96.7%的受试者手掌结果符合 ISO 15197:2003 和 ISO 15197:2013 的准确性标准。通过 Parkes 共识误差网格分析,100%的受试者指尖结果和 98.1%的受试者手掌结果都在 A 区(其余在 B 区)。问卷结果表明,大多数受试者认为 BGMS 易于使用。
Contour Plus BGMS 在实验室和未经训练的人员使用时均符合 ISO 15197:2003 和 ISO 15197:2013 的准确性标准。