Vogels Brittany, Cartwright Jade, Cocks Naomi
School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University , Perth , Australia.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;17(4):390-400. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2014.979877. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
The current study aimed to investigate what Australian speech-language pathologists frequently include in their bedside assessments in adult dysphagia, what factors influence these bedside assessments and whether they are consistent with the current evidence base.
These aims were achieved via an online questionnaire and a series of semi-structured interviews. In the questionnaire, respondents were asked to rate how frequently they utilized bedside assessment components on a scale of five ranging from never to always.
One hundred and forty practicing speech-language pathologists completed the online questionnaire in full. Eight interviews were then conducted. Respondents reported utilizing predominantly motor elements of their oro-motor examination with very few sensory elements being frequently utilized. Five main themes arose from the interviews including the influence of the individual patient and participant, the current evidence base, the participants' clinical practice and the participants' workplace.
The findings from this research have implications for current clinical and education practices, in particular the impact of education and training and caseload demands on current practice.
本研究旨在调查澳大利亚言语病理学家在成人吞咽困难床边评估中经常纳入哪些内容,哪些因素影响这些床边评估,以及它们是否与当前的证据基础一致。
通过在线问卷和一系列半结构化访谈实现这些目标。在问卷中,要求受访者按照从从不使用到总是使用的五级量表,对他们使用床边评估组件的频率进行评分。
140名执业言语病理学家完整填写了在线问卷。随后进行了8次访谈。受访者报告主要使用口腔运动检查中的运动要素,很少频繁使用感觉要素。访谈产生了五个主要主题,包括个体患者和参与者的影响、当前的证据基础、参与者的临床实践以及参与者的工作场所。
本研究结果对当前的临床和教育实践具有启示意义,特别是教育和培训以及工作量需求对当前实践的影响。