Oh Hyun Ho, Jung Cheolkyu, Lee Tae Hong, Kwon Bae Ju, Kim Young, Lee Kyu Chang
Department of Neurosurgery, Myongji Hospital; Goyang, South Korea -
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Seongnam, South Korea.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2014 Dec;20(6):693-703. doi: 10.15274/INR-2014-10062. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
Fluoroscopic images for comparison (FICs) can be easily obtained for follow-up on an outpatient basis. This study retrospectively assessed the diagnostic performance of a set of FICs for evaluation of recanalization after stent-assisted coiling, with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard. A total of 124 patients harboring 144 stent-assisted coiled aneurysms were included. At least one month postembolization they underwent follow-up angiograms comprising a routine frontal and lateral DSA and a working-angle DSA. For analysis, FICs should be compared with the mask images of postprocedural DSAs to find recanalization. Instead of FIC acquisition, the mask images of follow-up DSAs were taken as a substitute because of the same view-making processes as FICs, full availability, and perfect coincidence with follow-up DSAs. Two independent readers evaluated a set of 169 FICs and DSA images for the presence of recanalization one month apart. Sensitivity, specificity, and interreader agreement were determined. Recanalization occurred in 24 (14.2%) cases. Of these, nine (5.3%) cases were found to have significant recanalization in need of retreatment. Sensitivity and specificity rates were 79.2% (19 of 24) and 95.9% (139 of 145) respectively for reader 1, and 66.7% (16 of 24) and 97.9% (142 of 145) for reader 2. Minimal recanalization was identified in seven out of all eight false negative cases. Excluding minimally recanalized cases in no need for retreatment from the recanalization group, calculation resulted in high sensitivity and specificity of over 94% for both readers. Interreader agreement between the two readers was excellent (96.4%; κ = 0.84). FICs may be a good imaging modality to detect significant recanalization of stent-assisted coiled aneurysms.
随访时可轻松获取用于对比的透视图像(FIC),以便在门诊进行后续检查。本研究以数字减影血管造影(DSA)作为参考标准,回顾性评估了一组FIC对支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术后再通情况评估的诊断性能。共纳入124例患有144个支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞动脉瘤的患者。栓塞后至少1个月,他们接受了包括常规正位和侧位DSA以及工作角度DSA的随访血管造影。为进行分析,应将FIC与术后DSA的蒙片图像进行比较以发现再通情况。由于与FIC具有相同的成像过程、完全可用且与随访DSA完全吻合,因此采用随访DSA的蒙片图像替代FIC采集。两名独立阅片者相隔1个月对一组169张FIC和DSA图像进行再通情况评估。确定了敏感性、特异性和阅片者间一致性。24例(14.2%)出现再通。其中,9例(5.3%)发现有需要再次治疗的明显再通。阅片者1的敏感性和特异性分别为79.2%(24例中的19例)和95.9%(145例中的139例),阅片者2的分别为66.7%(24例中的16例)和97.9%(145例中的142例)。在所有8例假阴性病例中,有7例发现有轻微再通。从再通组中排除无需再次治疗的轻微再通病例后,计算得出两名阅片者的敏感性和特异性均超过94%。两名阅片者之间的阅片者间一致性良好(96.4%;κ = 0.84)。FIC可能是检测支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞动脉瘤明显再通的良好成像方式。