Suppr超能文献

鸽子通过联想学习同时获得多个类别:这与人类词汇学习有相似之处吗?

Pigeons acquire multiple categories in parallel via associative learning: a parallel to human word learning?

作者信息

Wasserman Edward A, Brooks Daniel I, McMurray Bob

机构信息

Dept. of Psychology, University of Iowa, United States; Delta Center, University of Iowa, United States.

Dept. of Psychology, Tufts University, United States.

出版信息

Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:99-122. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.020. Epub 2014 Dec 8.

Abstract

Might there be parallels between category learning in animals and word learning in children? To examine this possibility, we devised a new associative learning technique for teaching pigeons to sort 128 photographs of objects into 16 human language categories. We found that pigeons learned all 16 categories in parallel, they perceived the perceptual coherence of the different object categories, and they generalized their categorization behavior to novel photographs from the training categories. More detailed analyses of the factors that predict trial-by-trial learning implicated a number of factors that may shape learning. First, we found considerable trial-by-trial dependency of pigeons' categorization responses, consistent with several recent studies that invoke this dependency to claim that humans acquire words via symbolic or inferential mechanisms; this finding suggests that such dependencies may also arise in associative systems. Second, our trial-by-trial analyses divulged seemingly irrelevant aspects of the categorization task, like the spatial location of the report responses, which influenced learning. Third, those trial-by-trial analyses also supported the possibility that learning may be determined both by strengthening correct stimulus-response associations and by weakening incorrect stimulus-response associations. The parallel between all these findings and important aspects of human word learning suggests that associative learning mechanisms may play a much stronger part in complex human behavior than is commonly believed.

摘要

动物的类别学习与儿童的词汇学习之间是否存在相似之处?为了探究这种可能性,我们设计了一种新的联想学习技术,用于训练鸽子将128张物体照片分类为16个人类语言类别。我们发现鸽子能同时学会所有16个类别,它们能感知不同物体类别的感知连贯性,并且能将它们的分类行为推广到来自训练类别的新照片上。对预测逐次试验学习的因素进行的更详细分析涉及一些可能影响学习的因素。首先,我们发现鸽子的分类反应在逐次试验中存在相当大的依赖性,这与最近几项研究一致,这些研究利用这种依赖性声称人类通过符号或推理机制习得单词;这一发现表明这种依赖性也可能出现在联想系统中。其次,我们的逐次试验分析揭示了分类任务中看似不相关的方面,比如报告反应的空间位置,它会影响学习。第三,那些逐次试验分析也支持了这样一种可能性,即学习可能既由强化正确的刺激-反应关联决定,也由削弱错误的刺激-反应关联决定。所有这些发现与人类词汇学习的重要方面之间的相似性表明,联想学习机制在复杂的人类行为中可能发挥比通常认为的更强的作用。

相似文献

1
Pigeons acquire multiple categories in parallel via associative learning: a parallel to human word learning?
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:99-122. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.020. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
2
Pigeons exhibit flexibility but not rule formation in dimensional learning, stimulus generalization, and task switching.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2020 Apr;46(2):107-123. doi: 10.1037/xan0000234. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
3
A category-overshadowing effect in pigeons: support for the Common Elements Model of object categorization learning.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2012 Jul;38(3):322-8. doi: 10.1037/a0028803.
4
Conceptualization in pigeons: The evolution of a paradigm.
Behav Processes. 2016 Feb;123:4-14. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
5
Learning in rich networks involves both positive and negative associations.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Aug;145(8):1062-74. doi: 10.1037/xge0000187. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
6
View-invariance learning in object recognition by pigeons depends on error-driven associative learning processes.
Vision Res. 2012 Jun 1;62:148-61. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
7
Mechanisms of object recognition: what we have learned from pigeons.
Front Neural Circuits. 2014 Oct 13;8:122. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00122. eCollection 2014.
9
The neuroscience of perceptual categorization in pigeons: A mechanistic hypothesis.
Learn Behav. 2018 Sep;46(3):229-241. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0321-6.
10
Scene gist categorization by pigeons.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2014 Apr;40(2):162-77. doi: 10.1037/xan0000014.

引用本文的文献

1
Unlearning Incorrect Associations in Word Learning: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.
Cogn Sci. 2025 Jun;49(6):e70077. doi: 10.1111/cogs.70077.
2
Revisiting Topography-Based and Selection-Based Verbal Behavior.
Anal Verbal Behav. 2023 Mar 29;39(2):169-189. doi: 10.1007/s40616-023-00182-3. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Modeling within-session dynamics of categorical and item-memory mechanisms in pigeons.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1420-1444. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02416-w. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
4
The pigeon as a machine: Complex category structures can be acquired by a simple associative model.
iScience. 2023 Sep 22;26(10):107998. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107998. eCollection 2023 Oct 20.
5
Context congruence: How associative learning modulates cultural evolution.
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 4;18(4):e0282776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282776. eCollection 2023.
6
Visual categories and concepts in the avian brain.
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jan;26(1):153-173. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01711-8. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
7
Hierarchical and configural control in conditional discrimination learning.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2022 Oct;48(4):370-382. doi: 10.1037/xan0000342.
8
Multiple components of statistical word learning are resource dependent: Evidence from a dual-task learning paradigm.
Mem Cognit. 2021 Jul;49(5):984-997. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01141-w. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
9
Pigeons show how meta-control enables decision-making in an ambiguous world.
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 15;11(1):3838. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83406-7.
10
Cross-Situational Statistical Learning of New Words Despite Bilateral Hippocampal Damage and Severe Amnesia.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jan 14;13:448. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00448. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Fast Mapping but Poor Retention by 24-Month-Old Infants.
Infancy. 2008 Mar 4;13(2):128-157. doi: 10.1080/15250000701795598. Epub 2008 Mar 1.
2
The benefits of interleaved and blocked study: different tasks benefit from different schedules of study.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Feb;22(1):281-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0676-4.
3
Cross-situational word learning in the right situations.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 May;40(3):892-903. doi: 10.1037/a0035657. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
5
A bottom-up view of toddler word learning.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Feb;21(1):178-85. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0466-4.
6
The role of partial knowledge in statistical word learning.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Feb;21(1):1-22. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0443-y.
7
Children value informativity over logic in word learning.
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun;24(6):1017-23. doi: 10.1177/0956797612460691. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
8
Propose but verify: fast mapping meets cross-situational word learning.
Cogn Psychol. 2013 Feb;66(1):126-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验