Jaegerstrasse 17-19, Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, 62062, Aachen, Germany.
Departments of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Communication Sciences and Disorders, and Linguistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2021 Jul;49(5):984-997. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01141-w. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
It is increasingly understood that people may learn new word/object mappings in part via a form of statistical learning in which they track co-occurrences between words and objects across situations (cross-situational learning). Multiple learning processes contribute to this, thought to reflect the simultaneous influence of real-time hypothesis testing and graduate learning. It is unclear how these processes interact, and if any require explicit cognitive resources. To manipulate the availability of working memory resources for explicit processing, participants completed a dual-task paradigm in which a cross-situational word-learning task was interleaved with a short-term memory task. We then used trial-by-trial analyses to estimate how different learning processes that play out simultaneously are impacted by resource availability. Critically, we found that the effect of hypothesis testing and gradual learning effects showed a small reduction under limited resources, and that the effect of memory load was not fully mediated by these processes. This suggests that neither is purely explicit, and there may be additional resource-dependent processes at play. Consistent with a hybrid account, these findings suggest that these two aspects of learning may reflect different aspects of a single system gated by attention, rather than competing learning systems.
人们越来越理解,人们可能会通过一种统计学习的形式学习新的单词/对象映射,在这种形式中,他们在不同的情境下追踪单词和对象的共同出现(跨情境学习)。多种学习过程对此做出了贡献,这被认为反映了实时假设检验和渐进学习的同时影响。目前还不清楚这些过程是如何相互作用的,如果有任何过程需要明确的认知资源。为了操纵用于显式处理的工作记忆资源的可用性,参与者完成了一项双重任务范式,其中跨情境单词学习任务与短期记忆任务交错进行。然后,我们使用逐次分析来估计同时进行的不同学习过程如何受到资源可用性的影响。关键的是,我们发现假设检验和逐渐学习效果的影响在资源有限的情况下略有减少,并且记忆负荷的影响并非完全由这些过程介导。这表明两者都不是纯粹的显式的,可能还有其他依赖资源的过程在起作用。与混合解释一致,这些发现表明,学习的这两个方面可能反映了注意力门控的单一系统的不同方面,而不是竞争的学习系统。