Moreau Luc, Odar Boštjan, Higham Tom, Horvat Aleksander, Pirkmajer Darja, Turk Peter
MONREPOS Archaeological Research Centre and Museum for Human Behavioural Evolution, Schloss Monrepos, 56567 Neuwied, Germany.
Regentova 2, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
J Hum Evol. 2015 Jan;78:158-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
The Palaeolithic of southern Central Europe has a long history of archaeological research. Particularly, the presence of numerous osseous projectile points in many early Upper Palaeolithic (EUP) assemblages in this region has attracted the attention of the international research community. However, the scarcity of properly identified and well-dated Aurignacian contexts represents an obstacle for investigation of the nature and timing of the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition. In this context, the question of whether Neandertals made Aurignacian osseous projectile points, either on their own or as a consequence of cultural interaction with anatomically modern humans (AMH), still remains an open issue. Here we reassess the EUP record of Slovenia by evaluating the Aurignacian character of the assemblages from Potočka zijalka, Mokriška jama and Divje babe I in the light of their suggested roots in the local Mousterian. We provide a comprehensive description of the lithic industry from Potočka zijalka, which represents one of the rare EUP assemblages of southern Central Europe with a representative number of lithic artefacts to be analysed from the perspective of lithic technology and raw material economy. Our re-analysis of the Slovenian assemblages is backed by a series of 11 new ultrafiltered collagen 14C dates obtained directly on associated osseous projectile points from the studied assemblages. The Aurignacian of Potočka zijalka underlines the remarkable consistency of the Early Aurignacian with low typo-technological variability across Europe, resulting from a marked dependence on transported toolkits and raw material conservation. The new radiocarbon determinations for the Aurignacian of Slovenia appear to post-date the 34-32 ka BP (thousands of years before present) threshold for the last Neandertals in the region. Although not falsified, the hypothesis of Aurignacian bone tools in southern Central Europe as a product of late Neandertals is not supported by our re-examination of the EUP record of Slovenia.
中欧南部的旧石器时代有着悠久的考古研究历史。特别是,该地区许多早期旧石器时代晚期(EUP)遗址中存在大量骨质投射点,这引起了国际研究界的关注。然而,经过妥善鉴定且年代测定准确的奥瑞纳文化背景的稀缺,成为了研究旧石器时代中期向晚期过渡的性质和时间的障碍。在这种背景下,尼安德特人是否制造了奥瑞纳文化的骨质投射点,无论是他们独自制造还是与解剖学意义上的现代人(AMH)文化互动的结果,仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。在此,我们通过根据斯洛文尼亚当地穆斯特文化的根源,评估来自波托奇卡齐亚尔卡、莫克里什卡亚马和迪夫耶巴贝一号遗址的组合的奥瑞纳文化特征,重新评估斯洛文尼亚的旧石器时代晚期记录。我们对波托奇卡齐亚尔卡的石器工业进行了全面描述,该遗址是中欧南部罕见的旧石器时代晚期遗址之一,有大量具有代表性的石器制品,可从石器技术和原材料经济的角度进行分析。我们对斯洛文尼亚遗址组合的重新分析得到了一系列11个新的超滤胶原蛋白14C年代测定结果的支持,这些结果是直接从所研究遗址组合中的相关骨质投射点获得的。波托奇卡齐亚尔卡的奥瑞纳文化强调了早期奥瑞纳文化在欧洲范围内具有显著的一致性,其类型技术变异性较低,这是由于对运输而来的工具包和原材料保存的明显依赖所致。斯洛文尼亚奥瑞纳文化的新放射性碳测定结果似乎晚于该地区最后一批尼安德特人的距今34 - 32千年(距今数千年前)的时间阈值。尽管未被证伪,但我们对斯洛文尼亚旧石器时代晚期记录的重新审视并不支持中欧南部奥瑞纳文化骨器是晚期尼安德特人产物的假说。