• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗扎格罗斯地区旧石器时代晚期的开端。来自瓦瓦西和雅菲特的早期巴拉多斯石器时代组合的技术经济比较和埋藏学研究。

The beginning of the Upper Paleolithic in the Iranian Zagros. A taphonomic approach and techno-economic comparison of Early Baradostian assemblages from Warwasi and Yafteh (Iran).

机构信息

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

J Hum Evol. 2013 Jul;65(1):39-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.04.005
PMID:23742933
Abstract

Southwest Asia is a key region in current debates surrounding the appearance of the first cultures attributed to anatomically modern humans, particularly the Aurignacian and preceding cultural units of the Iranian Zagros, Levant, and the Balkans (Baradostian, Ahmarien, Kozarnikien, etc.). The Zagros mountain range encompasses an immense territory that remains understudied with regard to the Upper Paleolithic as well as the first bladelet industries traditionally presumed to be the work of anatomically modern humans. Concerning the emergence of the Aurignacian, the sites of Warwasi rockshelter and Yafteh cave in the central Zagros are considered to show evidence of in situ evolution of the Upper Paleolithic from the local Mousterian. This hypothesis is tested by way of a taphonomic, techno-typological and economic approach applied to the Upper Paleolithic levels of Warwasi (spits LL-AA) and Yafteh (the series from the lower part of the sequence). A comparison of the techno-economic features of both assemblages demonstrates a conceptual bond with contemporaneous techno-complexes from Levant and Europe (Ahmarian, Protoaurignacian, etc.). The techno-typological Middle Paleolithic character of the Warwasi lithic assemblage permits a discussion of a possible in situ dependence/continuum from the Mousterian or perhaps particular activities linked to the type of the occupation of the site. However, bladelet technology cannot be considered as rooted in the Zagros Mousterian. Consequently the origin of the Aurignacian sensu stricto has to be reconsidered.

摘要

西南亚是当前围绕第一批被认为是解剖学上现代人类的文化出现的辩论的关键地区,特别是伊朗扎格罗斯山脉、黎凡特和巴尔干地区的奥瑞纳文化和之前的文化单位(巴拉多斯蒂安、阿赫马兰、科扎尼基安等)。扎格罗斯山脉拥有广阔的领土,对于旧石器时代晚期以及传统上被认为是解剖学上现代人类的第一批薄片工业来说,该地区仍然缺乏研究。关于奥瑞纳文化的出现,中央扎格罗斯山脉的 Warwasi 石窟和 Yafteh 洞穴遗址被认为显示了旧石器时代晚期从当地莫斯特文化就地进化的证据。通过对 Warwasi(LL-AA 层)和 Yafteh(序列下部的系列)的旧石器时代晚期地层进行的埋藏学、技术类型学和经济方法的测试,验证了这一假说。对两个组合的技术经济特征进行比较,表明它们与黎凡特和欧洲的同期技术综合体(阿赫马兰、原始奥瑞纳文化等)具有概念上的联系。Warwasi 石器组合的中更新世技术类型特征允许讨论与莫斯特文化的就地依赖/连续关系,或者可能与遗址居住类型有关的特定活动。然而,薄片技术不能被认为是扎根于扎格罗斯莫斯特文化。因此,必须重新考虑狭义上的奥瑞纳文化的起源。

相似文献

1
The beginning of the Upper Paleolithic in the Iranian Zagros. A taphonomic approach and techno-economic comparison of Early Baradostian assemblages from Warwasi and Yafteh (Iran).伊朗扎格罗斯地区旧石器时代晚期的开端。来自瓦瓦西和雅菲特的早期巴拉多斯石器时代组合的技术经济比较和埋藏学研究。
J Hum Evol. 2013 Jul;65(1):39-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
2
Upper Paleolithic cultural diversity in the Iranian Zagros Mountains and the expansion of modern humans into Eurasia.伊朗扎格罗斯山脉的旧石器时代晚期文化多样性与现代人向欧亚大陆的扩张。
J Hum Evol. 2019 Jul;132:101-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 May 20.
3
Variability in Early Ahmarian lithic technology and its implications for the model of a Levantine origin of the Protoaurignacian.早期阿马里安石器技术的变异性及其对原奥瑞纳文化黎凡特起源模型的影响。
J Hum Evol. 2015 May;82:67-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.02.017.
4
On the local Mousterian origin of the Châtelperronian: Integrating typo-technological, chronostratigraphic and contextual data.关于夏特佩龙文化的当地莫斯特文化起源:整合类型技术、年代地层学和背景数据。
J Hum Evol. 2015 Sep;86:55-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
5
Chronometric investigations of the Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition in the Zagros Mountains using AMS radiocarbon dating and Bayesian age modelling.利用加速器质谱放射性碳测年法和贝叶斯年龄模型对扎格罗斯山脉旧石器时代中期到晚期过渡阶段的计时研究。
J Hum Evol. 2017 Aug;109:57-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
6
Reassessing the Aurignacian of Slovenia: techno-economic behaviour and direct dating of osseous projectile points.重新评估斯洛文尼亚的奥瑞纳文化:技术经济行为与骨制投射尖器的直接测年
J Hum Evol. 2015 Jan;78:158-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
7
The Châtelperronian conundrum: Blade and bladelet lithic technologies from Quinçay, France.沙泰勒佩罗难题:法国坎赛的石叶与小石叶石器技术
J Hum Evol. 2016 Jun;95:13-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
8
Paleolithic hominin remains from Eshkaft-e Gavi (southern Zagros Mountains, Iran): description, affinities, and evidence for butchery.来自埃什卡夫特-加维(伊朗扎格罗斯山脉南部)的旧石器时代古人类遗骸:描述、亲缘关系及屠宰证据
J Hum Evol. 2009 Sep;57(3):248-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.05.012. Epub 2009 Aug 5.
9
Mousterian technology and settlement dynamics in the site of Hummal (Syria).胡麦尔(叙利亚)遗址中的莫斯特技术和定居动态。
J Hum Evol. 2011 Nov;61(5):519-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.01.014. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
10
On the chronology of the Uluzzian.乌鲁济文化的年代学。
J Hum Evol. 2014 Mar;68:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.12.007. Epub 2014 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence of diverse animal exploitation during the Middle Paleolithic at Ghar-e Boof (southern Zagros).在扎格罗斯山脉南部的 Ghar-e Boof(古哈尔博夫遗址)发现中石器时代对多种动物的利用证据。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 3;13(1):19006. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45974-8.
2
Aurignacian dynamics in Southeastern Europe based on spatial analysis, sediment geochemistry, raw materials, lithic analysis, and use-wear from Românești-Dumbrăvița.基于空间分析、沉积物地球化学、原材料、石器分析和 Românești-Dumbrăvița 的使用痕迹的东南欧奥瑞纳文化动态。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 19;12(1):14152. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15544-5.
3
A critical assessment of the Protoaurignacian lithic technology at Fumane Cave and its implications for the definition of the earliest Aurignacian.
对富马内洞穴原奥瑞纳文化石器技术的批判性评估及其对最早奥瑞纳文化定义的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 7;12(12):e0189241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189241. eCollection 2017.
4
Understanding the emergence of modern humans and the disappearance of Neanderthals: Insights from Kaldar Cave (Khorramabad Valley, Western Iran).理解现代人的出现和尼安德特人的消失:来自伊朗西部卡尔达尔洞穴(霍拉马巴德山谷)的见解。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 2;7:43460. doi: 10.1038/srep43460.
5
New chronology for Ksâr 'Akil (Lebanon) supports Levantine route of modern human dispersal into Europe.克萨尔阿吉尔(黎巴嫩)的新年代学支持现代人类向欧洲扩散的黎凡特路线。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 23;112(25):7683-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501529112. Epub 2015 Jun 1.