Suppr超能文献

依普利酮治疗轻至中度动脉性高血压的疗效与安全性:系统评价与荟萃分析

Efficacy and safety of eplerenone in the management of mild to moderate arterial hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Pelliccia Francesco, Patti Giuseppe, Rosano Giuseppe, Greco Cesare, Gaudio Carlo

机构信息

Department "Attilio Reale", Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2014 Nov 15;177(1):219-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.09.091. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of eplerenone in arterial hypertension has been investigated only in small studies. To systematically assess the efficacy and tolerability of eplerenone in patients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension, we did a meta-analysis of controlled randomized trials.

METHODS

We performed an electronic literature search of Medline, Pubmed, Scopus and Cochrane databases for studies published up to March 31, 2014. Randomized studies comparing eplerenone with placebo or other antihypertensive drugs for net reduction of systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP; DBP) from baseline and for incidence of adverse events were considered. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and odds ratios with 95% confidence interval were calculated for continuous and dichotomous data, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 11 trials and 3566 patients were overall included. Compared to placebo, eplerenone significantly reduced either SBP [WMD -8.07, 95% CI -8.17 to -7.96 mm Hg, p < 0.00001] and DBP [WMD -4.08, -4.15 to -4.01 mm Hg, p < 0.00001]. In the overall comparison, reduction of both SBP and DBP with eplerenone was greater than other antihypertensive agents (WMD for SBP -1.50 mm Hg, p < 0.0001; WMD for DBP -0.54 mm Hg, p < 0.00001); this was essentially driven by a greater anti-hypertensive action vs enalapril and losartan for SBP and vs losartan for DBP. Rates of any adverse event were significantly higher with eplerenone than placebo (odds ratio 1.37, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.71; p = 0.005), whereas the occurrence of serious adverse events and hyperkalemia was similar. There was no difference between eplerenone and other antihypertensives in the frequency of any or serious adverse events, whereas hyperkalemia was more common with eplerenone (odds ratio 2.36, 95% CI 1.00 to 5.57; p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study-level meta-analysis provides a robust evidence that eplerenone has a reassuring safety profile and is effective in lowering blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension; this effect is at least comparable to that of other anti-hypertensive agents (PROSPERO Registration No. CRD42014010071).

摘要

背景

依普利酮在动脉高血压中的作用仅在小型研究中得到探讨。为系统评估依普利酮在轻至中度动脉高血压患者中的疗效和耐受性,我们对对照随机试验进行了一项荟萃分析。

方法

我们对Medline、Pubmed、Scopus和Cochrane数据库进行了电子文献检索,以查找截至2014年3月31日发表的研究。纳入比较依普利酮与安慰剂或其他抗高血压药物以从基线净降低收缩压和舒张压(SBP;DBP)以及不良事件发生率的随机研究。分别针对连续数据和二分数据计算加权平均差(WMD)和95%置信区间的比值比。

结果

总共纳入了11项试验和3566名患者。与安慰剂相比,依普利酮显著降低了SBP [WMD -8.07,95% CI -8.17至-7.96 mmHg,p < 0.00001] 和DBP [WMD -4.08,-4.15至-4.01 mmHg,p < 0.00001]。在总体比较中,依普利酮降低SBP和DBP的幅度大于其他抗高血压药物(SBP的WMD为-1.50 mmHg,p < 0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验