Desjardins Paul J, Olugemo Kemi, Solorio Daniel, Young Clarence L
Desjardins Associates, LLC, Maplewood, New Jersey.
Parexel International Corporation, Baltimore, Maryland.
Clin Ther. 2015 Feb 1;37(2):448-61. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.10.018. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
This study compared the pharmacokinetic properties and safety profile of low-dose (18- and 35-mg) diclofenac capsules manufactured using SoluMatrix Fine Particle Technology (Trademark of iCeutica Inc. (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania), and the technology is licensed to Iroko Pharmaceuticals, LLC (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) for exclusive use in NSAIDs), which produces submicron-sized drug particles with enhanced dissolution properties, to those of diclofenac potassium immediate-release (IR) 50-mg tablets.
This Phase 1, single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose crossover study was conducted in 40 healthy volunteers. Subjects received, in randomized order, SoluMatrix diclofenac 18- or 35-mg capsules in the fasting condition, SoluMatrix diclofenac 35-mg capsules under fed conditions, and diclofenac potassium IR 50-mg tablets under fasting and fed conditions. Pharmacokinetic parameters (T(max), C(max), AUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞)) were calculated from the concentrations of diclofenac in the plasma. Absorption, food effect, and dose proportionality were determined using a mixed-model ANOVA for C(max), AUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞). Tolerability was assessed by recording adverse events, physical examination findings, vital sign measurements: clinical laboratory test results.
Overall, 35 healthy volunteers aged 18 to 52 years completed the study. The mean age of the subjects was 33.4 years, and approximately half were men (47.5%). Median T(max) values were similar between the low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac 35-mg capsules and the diclofenac potassium IR 50-mg tablets (both, ~1.0 hour). The mean maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) after the administration of low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac 35-mg capsules was 26% lower than that with diclofenac potassium IR 50-mg tablets under fasting conditions (868.72 vs 1194.21 ng/mL). The administration of low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac 35-mg capsules was associated with a 23% lower overall systemic exposure compared with that of diclofenac potassium IR 50-mg tablets under fasting conditions. Food decreased the rate but not the overall extent of absorption of SoluMatrix diclofenac. No serious AEs and no clinically significant abnormalities in physical examination findings, including vital sign measurements, or clinical laboratory test results, were noted during this study.
The pharmacokinetic properties of low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac capsules in the healthy volunteers in this study suggest rapid diclofenac absorption as measured by T(max). Low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac capsules represent a potential option for the management of acute and osteoarthritis-related pain.
本研究比较了采用SoluMatrix细颗粒技术(iCeutica公司(宾夕法尼亚州费城)的商标,该技术已授权给Iroko制药有限责任公司(宾夕法尼亚州费城)独家用于非甾体抗炎药)生产的低剂量(18毫克和35毫克)双氯芬酸胶囊与双氯芬酸钾速释(IR)50毫克片剂的药代动力学特性和安全性。SoluMatrix细颗粒技术可生产具有增强溶解特性的亚微米级药物颗粒。
本1期单中心、随机、开放标签、单剂量交叉研究纳入了40名健康志愿者。受试者按随机顺序,在禁食条件下服用18毫克或35毫克的SoluMatrix双氯芬酸胶囊,在进食条件下服用35毫克的SoluMatrix双氯芬酸胶囊,以及在禁食和进食条件下服用双氯芬酸钾IR 50毫克片剂。根据血浆中双氯芬酸的浓度计算药代动力学参数(Tmax、Cmax、AUC(0 - t)、AUC(0 - ∞))。使用混合模型方差分析Cmax、AUC(0 - t)、AUC(0 - ∞)来确定吸收、食物影响和剂量比例关系。通过记录不良事件、体格检查结果、生命体征测量值和临床实验室检查结果来评估耐受性。
总体而言,35名年龄在18至52岁之间的健康志愿者完成了研究。受试者的平均年龄为33.4岁,约一半为男性(47.5%)。低剂量35毫克的SoluMatrix双氯芬酸胶囊与双氯芬酸钾IR 50毫克片剂的中位Tmax值相似(均约为1.0小时)。在禁食条件下,服用低剂量35毫克的SoluMatrix双氯芬酸胶囊后的平均最大血浆浓度(Cmax)比服用双氯芬酸钾IR 50毫克片剂低26%(868.72对1194.21纳克/毫升)。与禁食条件下的双氯芬酸钾IR 50毫克片剂相比,服用低剂量35毫克的SoluMatrix双氯芬酸胶囊后的总体全身暴露量低23%。食物降低了SoluMatrix双氯芬酸的吸收速率,但未降低吸收的总体程度。在本研究期间,未观察到严重不良事件,体格检查结果(包括生命体征测量值)或临床实验室检查结果也无临床显著异常。
本研究中健康志愿者服用低剂量SoluMatrix双氯芬酸胶囊的药代动力学特性表明,以Tmax衡量双氯芬酸吸收迅速。低剂量SoluMatrix双氯芬酸胶囊是治疗急性和骨关节炎相关疼痛的一个潜在选择。