Suppr超能文献

单侧耳聋或不对称听力损失患者的人工耳蜗植入:证据的系统评价

Cochlear implantation for patients with single-sided deafness or asymmetrical hearing loss: a systematic review of the evidence.

作者信息

van Zon Alice, Peters Jeroen P M, Stegeman Inge, Smit Adriana L, Grolman Wilko

机构信息

*Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and †Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Otol Neurotol. 2015 Feb;36(2):209-19. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000681.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review of the literature to evaluate the clinical outcome of cochlear implantation for patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) or asymmetrical hearing loss (AHL).

DATA SOURCES

We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases from their inception up to December 10, 2013 for SSD or AHL and cochlear implantation or their synonyms.

STUDY SELECTION

In total, 781 articles were retrieved, of which 15 satisfied the eligibility criteria. Our outcomes of interest were speech perception in noise, sound localization, quality of life (QoL), and tinnitus.

DATA EXTRACTION

Critical appraisal showed that six studies reported on less than five patients or that they carried a low directness of evidence or a high risk of bias. Therefore, we extracted the data of nine studies (n = 112). Patient numbers, age, duration of deafness, classification of deafness, pure tone audiometry, follow-up duration, and outcome measurements were extracted from all nine articles.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Because of large heterogeneity between studies, we were not able to pool data in a meta-analysis. We therefore summarized the results of the studies specified per outcome.

CONCLUSION

There are no high-level-of-evidence studies concerning cochlear implantation in patients with SSD or AHL. Current literature suggests important benefits of cochlear implantation regarding sound localization, QoL, and tinnitus. Varying results were reported for speech perception in noise, possibly caused by the large clinical heterogeneity between studies. Larger and high-quality studies are certainly warranted.

摘要

目的

对文献进行系统综述,以评估单侧耳聋(SSD)或不对称听力损失(AHL)患者人工耳蜗植入的临床效果。

数据来源

我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和CINAHL数据库,检索时间从数据库创建至2013年12月10日,检索词为SSD或AHL以及人工耳蜗植入或其同义词。

研究选择

共检索到781篇文章,其中15篇符合纳入标准。我们感兴趣的结果包括噪声中的言语感知、声音定位、生活质量(QoL)和耳鸣。

数据提取

批判性评价显示,六项研究报告的患者少于五例,或者证据的直接性较低或偏倚风险较高。因此,我们提取了九项研究(n = 112)的数据。从所有九篇文章中提取了患者数量、年龄、耳聋持续时间、耳聋分类、纯音听力测定、随访持续时间和结果测量指标。

数据综合

由于研究之间存在较大异质性,我们无法在荟萃分析中汇总数据。因此,我们按每个结果总结了指定研究的结果。

结论

目前尚无关于SSD或AHL患者人工耳蜗植入的高证据水平研究。当前文献表明人工耳蜗植入在声音定位、生活质量和耳鸣方面有重要益处。关于噪声中的言语感知,报告结果各异,这可能是由于研究之间存在较大的临床异质性所致。显然需要开展更大规模的高质量研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验